Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Relief From The Brady Act?

Rate this question


ledbthand

Question

I just Got a letter last week stating that I am in fact incompetent. They basically said no problem getting my wife set up as my fiduciary, but as far as another friend or family member it's practically impossible. Also apparently because I have "trouble managing my own finances" I can no longer own a gun or ammo unless I face fines and jail time.

My only real hope now is to file for "Relief from the Brady Act". I don't know. As if life wasn't sucking enough you know?

My question is,

How hard is it to get relief from the brady act? I can't think of any reason why my inability to count my own money (bullshit btw) would constitute the need to take away my gun privileges? Is there basically a template letter you can copy / paste or is this a long drawn out fight I'm probably going to lose?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

They finally came out yesterday to "check up on me". The guy was here for less than 20 minutes, didn't even go any where in my house, except the kitchen, and filled out the paper work to let me be my own fiduciary. Seems like a lot of wasted time and undue stress to put me through. He said that he has to come back next year and do the same but will release me from the Brady act and having to deal with having a fiduciary. Even though, technically, I'm my own fiduciary.

He also said it's been happening a lot lately to younger veterans. So be careful not to tell your Dr. "My wife pays the bills".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I thought you had to have been involuntarily committed to a state institution or be a felon for the government to not allow you to have guns. Come to Florida. You can get your concealed weapons permit at one sitting including fingerprints. I am thinking about getting a "piece". With road rage around here you can assume anyone who gives you the finger is probably armed legally or illegally. Just because you are 100% for mental condition does not mean you can't own a gun. Now if you are declared incompetent it might be a different story. If you read the actual description of 100% scheduler mental disability then you would agree that this person should not even be allowed outside during the day. 100% scheduler criteria in no way corresponds to actual mental condition of most 100% vets. It seems to me since you have constitutional right to own a firearm this is a fundamental right, just like free speech or freedom of assembly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The Brady Act is apparently automatically put into play when you are declared incompetent. I'm at %80 total and my unemployability was deferred. I'm not planning on buying any guns in the future, and I think that's really the only time it will matter until I'm release at the end of this year. I live in Arizona so not really missing out on any hunting or anything anyway. I don't live in the ghetto either. I just don't like the idea of being told "NO" by a BS paper pusher. I've handled guns since I was about 3 years old. Never had a problem. I say "My wife pays the bills" and all of a sudden I'm a huge risk to the safety of others. Just feels wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I thought you had to have been involuntarily committed to a state institution or be a felon for the government to not allow you to have guns. Come to Florida. You can get your concealed weapons permit at one sitting including fingerprints. I am thinking about getting a "piece". With road rage around here you can assume anyone who gives you the finger is probably armed legally or illegally. Just because you are 100% for mental condition does not mean you can't own a gun. Now if you are declared incompetent it might be a different story. If you read the actual description of 100% scheduler mental disability then you would agree that this person should not even be allowed outside during the day. 100% scheduler criteria in no way corresponds to actual mental condition of most 100% vets. It seems to me since you have constitutional right to own a firearm this is a fundamental right, just like free speech or freedom of assembly.

The problem is that competent or not, if a person has a record of treatment or commitment for "mental conditions" the laws are generally such that gun ownership is a no no.

Further, the VA has a very unusual and unique standard question for determining incompetency that you can easily breach. No matter that the VA person involved has no legal or professional recognition

to make such a determination, since the veteran's action (My wife pays the bills) caused the incompetent "box" to be checked.

Edited by Chuck75
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

In Florida as long as you are not a felon or have been involuntarily committed to a mental institution by a court you can own a gun. Just because you see a shrink is no reason to lose your constitutional rights. There has to be due process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Unfortunately the "Brady Act" kicks in when the VA determines that a veteran is not competent to handle their VA funds.

That overrides state laws, unless the veteran has something like a court determination of competency to use in rebuttal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use