Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

New Va Az Director Has "baggage"


Berta

Recommended Posts

http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/arizona/investigations/2014/11/28/new-southwest-va-director-arrives-baggage/19604745/

In part:

"The Department of Veterans Affairs has imported a new boss to temporarily oversee health-care operations in the Southwest one with a history of VA controversy at her permanent post in Florida, including a hidden video camera installed in a patient's room.

Kathleen Fogarty arrived this month as a fill-in at the Veterans Integrated Southwest Network, which includes the beleaguered Phoenix VA hospital."

and

"Fogarty was in charge when administrators there deployed a covert video camera in a patient's room. Korean War veteran Joseph Carnegie had previously suffered brain injury that family members blamed on negligence.

Natalie Carnegie, the patient's daughter, said she was sickened by Fogarty's leadership at the time, and stunned to learn VA Secretary Robert McDonald assigned her to a Southwest VA region beleaguered by integrity issues.

"I'm disgusted," Natalie Carnegie said in a phone interview. "To send the VA queen of cover-ups to Phoenix it's just a spit in our face.

The hidden camera in Joseph Carnegie's hospital room led to a probe last year by the VA Office of Inspector General, which concluded that no other veterans facility in the nation was using concealed cameras in patient quarters. Inspectors said family members did not give advance consent for the device, planted inside a smoke detector, and that VA administrators issued false information to the public about the incident.

Nevertheless, inspectors exonerated the Tampa medical center, asserting that the camera had reasonably been installed for patient safety." yeah right

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta, hope your holiday was good.

This is really maddening. It is a shell game. She probably ate TH dinner at

Sharon Hellman home in phoenix to catch up on how to handle us folks in Phoenix. Or maybe they went to the Hot tub in Vegas .........just unreal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

I hope not, but this looks like the same old, same old as previous secretary's. You screw up in the VA...you go direct to management.

I think its a requirement to be a VA manager to be able to "cover up" your old mistakes minimizing them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These people literally have to "know where the bodies are buried." How on earth can they just jump around from facility to facility leaving dead and damaged veterans in their wake with no consequences or accountability? It just defies any normal logic!

This makes me sick at my stomach!

This VA crap will vanish from public view only if we let it vanish.

There is a very important issue in this article that we have discussed here on hadit several times over the years--recording in a VA facility. As I have often stated, I believe it is legal to record YOUR activities (appointments, exams, etc.) in a VA facility if you are in a one-party state. I do it all the time. Arizona is a one-party state. You just have to made damned sure that you don't accidentally record someone else's activities. In a two (all) party state, there may be a question about it. Here the VA has stated publicly that there is no privacy issue because it is federal property. I believe that to be complete BS, but if they want it that way GREAT because federal law is one-party. If the VA claims federal statutes trump state laws (usually the case but not always--see FTCA) to defend their use of a hidden camera, then they cannot turn around and prohibit us from doing the same thing. The VA General Counsel opinion (VAOPGCPREC 04-91) did not prohibit taping a C&P exam as many contend; it only stated that not being allowed to have an attorney present and record the C&P exam was not "adequate reason" for a veteran to refuse to be examined. A huge difference! In 1991, VA medical care and disability compensation were considered to be "gifts from a grateful nation." They are now considered to be "property" which under the protection of the 5th and 14th Amendments cannot be "taken" by the government without "due process."

"Nevertheless, the inspector general concluded that the camera was not really secret because the Carnegies detected it, and it wasn't a privacy infringement because the government owns the hospital room. No VA employee was disciplined."

"On Nov. 4, the Veterans Health Administration issued a new directive stemming from the Carnegie controversy: Covert audio and video recordings are allowed in treatment areas (patient rooms) without consent of people filmed if the taping is done to detect staff wrongdoing. However, such filming cannot be done without high-level approvals."

Here is a list of the various state laws:

http://www.rcfp.org/reporters-recording-guide/state-state-guide

Florida is a strict all-party state! Additionally, Florida specifically prohibits "hidden cameras."

"Hidden cameras: The state’s video voyeurism laws prohibit the installation of any imaging devices “to secretly view, broadcast, or record a person, without that person’s knowledge and consent” in circumstances where the person is privately exposing the body in an area where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy. Fla. Stat. § 810.145. The law also bans secretly videotaping underneath or through clothing without the subject’s consent. Id."

Here is the new VA publication mentioned in the article:

http://www.va.gov/vhapublications/ViewPublication.asp?pub_ID=3050

With all of the nasty stuff going on, it really pleased me to read and watch this:

http://www.foxnews.com/health/2014/11/27/family-hears-sons-heart-beat-in-vietnam-vets-chest-after-life-saving-transplant/?intcmp=latestnews

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

This old American Tourister advertisement seems to capture the essence of the VA baggage bureaucracy

props_bags_luggage_gorilla.jpg

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I use the VA hospital in Tampa. That deal with the hidden camera was a big deal for weeks locally. The only way to get real change at the VA is for vets to descend on the local VA's in mass and demand it. Short of that nothing much is going to change. All the congressional dog and pony shows are not going to make this system change. I am getting too old for this stuff. I have my insurance and medicare. I am taken care of so to speak. However, I would like to see Fire and Blood rain down on the VA. I hate this class system we live under with a government that craps on us. The VA is the same, essentially, as it was 40 years ago. I don't like living as a serf in the land of the 1%. If we do not stand up for ourselves we deserve what we get. When the time is right things can change in hours. We, vets, can change this system we have now. If we could survive Basic, deployments to Overseas, RVN, Iraq or Afghanistan I think we could stand up to VA thugs for a few hours. What is the worst thing that could happen besides a beating, injury, mace, jail or death? Many of us have already had that happen to us except the last part. I guess I am talking about civil disobedience and not about violence on our part. We don't even have to break the law to demonstrate our displeasure with the VA system. Just showing up at a certain time and place with some placards would shock them so bad they would call out the National Guard who should join us.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use