Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

A Few Good People Still In Va

Rate this question


RUREADY

Question

I will try and be short. A friend who I help file some claims for upper back ,lower back ,hearing,

and tinnitus and he gets call in for a C&P's. HE is a retired vet with 23 years the examiner find a

lot of injuries that look old. He has been getting treatment while in service and with VA Atlanta with

profiles for all while in service. They never told him anything was wrong with him while being treated

in Atl nor could the examiner find any records. This examiner finds his records and also finds a claim

that's been setting there since 2005 nothing been done ""but a claim was file"" anyway VA call Cue and

awarded 40% back until 2005 when it was file. The claim that we just file raise his total to 80%. He hearing

in right ear that has a cyst that is pushing against the brain that may need surgery with kemo treatment.

He has two question I cant answer can he file 1151 claim if VA knew this and didn't tell him???(hearing}

How will this effect his retirement????. Anybody who know

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

If he got his injuries due to combat related factors then it should help him. As far as the cyst if the VA doctor or VA hospital knew he had a cyst pushing against his brain or should have known that would be malpractice. I think 1151 claims are for when VA care causes a disability to get worse or results in a new injury. For instance, to cure a hernia they cause damage to one of your internal organs that might be a 1151 or a malpractice claim. You have to prove all this of course. If you got for an ear exam and the doctor misses that you have hearing loss due to some tumor about blow up in your brain then that is malpractice IMO.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thank you for helping this veteran.!

""but a claim was file"" anyway VA call Cue and

awarded 40% back until 2005 when it was file. The claim that we just file raise his total to 80%"

That is GREAT!

"He hearing

in right ear that has a cyst that is pushing against the brain that may need surgery with kemo treatment.

He has two question I cant answer can he file 1151 claim if VA knew this and didn't tell him???(hearing}

How will this effect his retirement????. Anybody who know"

John is absolutely Correct.

1151 claims need

1. Proof of negligence and

2. proof of additional disability taed at least at 10% directly due to the malpractice.

"surgery with Chemo" ??????????? why chemo????

The husband I had years prior to my USMC husband was an Army vet with a brain tumor.

A tumor is not a cyst and it was consider benign (meaning in those days not cancerous)

It started to affect everything about him mentally and physically but the surgeon never suggested chemotherapy at all.

I am very concerned that they think he 'might' need surgery and also chemotherapy....

By "they" do you mean the VA or does he have private doctors?

My USMC husband's VA "doctor" told him he needed "brain surgery" because she misread an MRI. I got the doctors on the phone she had just spoken too at a different VA and they read me the MRI results and I immediately knew it was not a surgical problem.

They had been treating him for an inner ear problem as an in patient, but it was actually a major stroke.No ear problem at all.

I strongly suggest that with some of the retro he got, that he consider getting a second opinion from a Real Neuro doctor as well as an IMO.

Dr Bash is a NeuroRadiologist and therefore has far more expertise than the VA in interpreting MRIs and CT scans, X rays etc.

He did 2 excellent IMOs for me and has helped many others here.

I assume he gets either CRDP or CRSC as well as VA comp..

A Section 1151 rating could potentially boost his DFAS amount.

Whether his ear condition or the cyst is service connected or not, if his 1151 claim succeeds, they pay this " as if " service connected compensation.

Has he applied for TDIU?

Do you know the medical term for the cyst?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

just to add:

We have lots of 1151 info here in the FTCA and 1151 forums.

Also, what was it that triggered the VA to find the cyst?

Had it caused other documented problems, like headaches,memory problems, balance problems,

pain, etc prior to being diagnosed?

Had VA done past MRIs, CTs or X rays of his head ( possibly due to the hearing problem,) that revealed this cyst long before they told him about it?

Did he present documented symptoms of the affect of the cyst to a point that they should have ruled this in or out long ago?

I am not a doctor but found this article that states:

"When a cyst is associated with an

underlying tumor, the tumor is usually obvious because CT or MRI scan shows a nodule or lump

adjoining the cyst. Certain benign tumors

--

including hemangioblastomas, pilocytic

astrocytomas, and gangliogliomas

-

-

are commonly associated with cysts and are usually

treated with surgery. Malignant tumors may also be associated with cysts; these tumors may

require radiation and/or chemotherapy in addition to surgery when feasible"

http://www.abta.org/secure/resource-one-sheets/cysts.pdf

The fact that VA mentioned possible chemo therapy tells me this might be more serious then they know (or want to tell the veteran.)

RUREADY, as you know IMOs are costly.....and they dont aways help some claims at all.....a IMO doctor only has the medical evidence to go by.

But even if they dont reveal maplpractice, they can give a vet or their survivor peace of mind,knowing the VA did give them proper care.

If he has a private Neuro treating him, the cost might not be too high at all, if they are willing to prepare an IMO, folowing the IMO criteria here at hadit.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

john999 & Bertha thanks a lot HE has been getting treatment at VA but he is the one that

never ask anything about whats going on and he says they never told him about a problem

Bertha all his treatment was with VA, he did not file for tdiu yet just waiting on the BBE to come

The cue didn't explain much as to why it was a cue just they find some errors. All this came into play

after the examiner finds his records. He says if VA would have treated him back then for hearing loss

he would be able to hear now. The chemo treatment I ask also did they think its cancerous?? just its a possibility

it could be that worries me hearing aides prescribe. The examiner says this has been there a long time it didn't

just started that's when the records were find and he was seeing VA doctors, keeping appointments. just never

asking questions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use