Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Should I Ask For An Increase?

Rate this topic


snowshovel

Recommended Posts

snowshovel:

I'm sorry to hear of your situation and wish you great luck with your issues and I have s similar situtation with low-ball exams and procedures below.

When I had my back CP it was done last year by a VA CP Nurse that did not perform the exam according to the regulation, I was very disappointed. The measurements were way off and the nerve damage and number of annual episodes were never mentioned at all in the exam. When I challenged the basic errors in the results, I was told by her, "don't worry, the raters see your whole file and will sort it out later? I assumed that exams would always done professionally like they were when I was in the military? But not so, the shame is that we have former military personal that payed a huge price and many live their lives in pain as well as can't work. However, many examiners that never served and some with attitudes towards Vets enter life changing decisions on Vets without regard to following the proper rules? Certainly, one cannot categorize every examiner in that group but one would ask how do they become that way and disregard the rules of evidence and become synical about Vets? Some say those type of medical people are overworked which contributes to their attitudes? But that's not an acceptale excuse. One of my biggest and first lessons with the disability program is how adversarial it really is and that non-doctor examiner gatekeepers have a great deal of power over vets and their futures. Early on, I was told that VETS have to fight for everything that they get and it will takes years of frustration and pain to eventually get what you deserve? That's even if a VET has solid evidence in their SMRs and there's a clear link to your injuries with a good nexus that eliminates doubt? I'm a Process Analyst and have read countless reports about the FDC Process for instance, but in my own case very little has occurred as advertised to VBA Leadership, Congress and the public about this wonderful new program? Sure, there's a few success stories out there but for the most part the FDC and Regular Program are pretty much the same. My original FDC had a 15 months completion timeline and;last month was extended to 37 months for my FDC. I was told the primary reason was that I did a FOIA to see if all of my records and evidence was digitised in VBMS? Subsequently, I cancelled it, but it came off for a month, then yesteday ebennifits showed that it has reappeared as a FOIA claim once again delaying my processing further.

But, you should gather any new evidence and put in for an increase because it's clear that you deserve one.....never ever give up...

Edited by rootbeer22
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use