Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Trying to make sense of DRO review

Rate this question


bluevet

Question

I filed a NOD with a request for DRO review a little over a year ago. 2 week ago I received notification of another C&P exam, which I attended and have confirmed that the results are with the VA. I have never spoken with a DRO and have not been made aware of a DRO having been assigned to this point. I was told, by the 1800 number, that a VSR had ordered the new C&P. I'm just confused about the process my appeal is taking. Is this a normal function of a VSR?  At this point, all evidence (IMO's, C&Ps) are in and my appeal should be ready for a decision, but none of this has followed the process that I was expecting. Anyone with experience have any thoughts?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

The 1-800 number should be able to tell you if your case is pending DRO review. Unfortunately, they can't give you exact dates of when it will be reviewed. There are two types of DRO review. The first is just that - DRO review. The second is an in-person DRO review. I chose the in-person route because I wanted to be able to present my evidence directly, ask questions, and get answers. The drawback to in-person review is that it could take longer because they have to block off time instead of grabbing your C-file and working it immediately.

If the time between your previous C&P is too great, they may ask for a new one. Your VSR probably requested the C&P so that you have a relatively recent evaluation. It's probably their way of just looking out for you.

If you have not heard back from the NOD/DRO by the time your claim is 18 months old, call them back and check again. If it is still in limbo at that time, call the 202 number in this link. They might be able to help get things moving. I was told they can't help until an NOD is 18+ months old.

Good luck!

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

As Vync says I would ask for the DRO Hearing.  At least you get to look the DRO in the eye and he has to admit you are a human being and not just a stack of papers.  Just realize their are no casual questions at a DRO Hearing.   The DRO is trying to determine how your disability affects you and how you present yourself.  I would get a VSO to go with me to present my case.   You don't want to look like Perry Mason especially if you are doing a PTSD claim or TBI claim.   I would bring copies of all my evidence with me just in case the DRO does not have it all.

 

 

             John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

With all do respect, I don't see why a DRO hearing would be beneficial. I'm not really sure how we got on the topic of hearing vs. no hearing, but I see this advice given too often. In my case, my evidence is strong. I have an IMO that unquestionably knocks down my first C&P. Also, I am extremely confident about the results of the new C&P, as the examiner was very clear about the findings he intended to submit, although, to be absolutely sure, I am going to the RO tomorrow to get a copy. In my case, as with many other vets, a hearing request would likely only serve to further delay my DRO appeal and open me up to verbally damaging my claim on the record. It's very easy to say something wrong under that kind of pressure. Unless the DRO feels the need to request a hearing, there is no benefit that I can see to putting myself in the hot seat.

Edited by bluevet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

 

I would ask how many DRO Reviews or Hearings have you been to in your claimant history?  Why do you say that "  as with many other vets, a hearing request would likely only serve to delay an appeal"?  What delays your appeal is to lose it at the DRO level and have to go to the BVA or CAVC.  That realty delays a claim by a 5-10 years in some cases.    Maybe you don't have an argument, and your facts will speak for themselves?  I hope so.  The DRO will not feel the need for a hearing.  The DRO will feel the need to get rid of your claim as fast as he/she can.  Until you see the C&P  exam you have no idea what is in it.  If you see the advise for a DRO Hearing given too often  maybe you don't understand the process.   I wish you well.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Vync gave a very good and appropriate response to my question. In his response, he also acknowledged that requesting a DRO hearing can cause delay. John999, without knowing anything about my claim or the evidence in my file, it seems irresponsible to advise me or any other veteran to actively pursue being place under oath to be examined. You are welcome to your opinion, but quite frankly, it's unsolicited. I started this thread to see if anyone had some insight into why a VSR would have requested another C&P. I have done plenty of research and I have worked my case on my own to this point. I fully expected, that once my case was assigned to a Decision Review Officer, that a new C&P would be ordered, hence, my question. Please don't hijack my thread, I'm just looking for some insight to help gauge where my claim is in the process.

Edited by bluevet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

Hi Bluevet,
I was just providing my opinion based on my experiences with the process with respect to your original post. Please understand that John999 has a great deal more experience than I do and has provided me with very valuable advice over the years resulting in a solid win against VA red tape. Dealing with the VA is a very frustrating experience for us vets.

The best way to win against the VA is to be prepared, knowledgeable, and (as you indicated) have solid evidence on your side.

Additionally, a lot of folks have no idea that you can request an in-person meeting with a DRO or that you can call the 202 number after 18 months. I wanted to make sure that you were aware of the options, but realize that going to an in-person DRO meeting is not everyone. It is better to know about these options ahead of time instead of learning about them after the fact.

Personally, I am glad I chose the in-person DRO route. It's not for everybody. I wanted to humanize the experience instead of being just another c-file waiting to be processed. The DRO understood that I was nervous. Yeah, I was under oath, but it's the same as putting your signature on any statements you send to the VA. My VSO and I reviewed everything ahead of time and was in there with me. The ability to ask questions and get answers immediately was personally valuable to me. The best part was then the DRO said the raters "seriously screwed up".

I wish you the best of luck with your claim.

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use