Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

VSO's "In" on delaying your claim

Rate this question


broncovet

Question

  • Moderator

So, you call your VSO (if he bothers to return your call), and ask him "how long"?   His response is that their is a "big backlog" at the VARO or the BVA.  And now, you get "the rest of the story", as Paul Harvey used to say:  

     THE VSO's contribute to the backlog.  They like us to think that they RUSH our claim off to be processed, and its all the Regional office and BVA's fault for the backlog.  This isnt true, at least not all the time.  A few years ago, ebenefits had my appeal as "with VSO".  It seemed to be "with VSO" for a rather long period of time, so I checked.  Sure enough a call to the BVA confirmed that my (national) Veterans Service Officer had my claim file.  

     So, I called the VSO, and asked them what was the delay?  They responded that, since I already had a docket number, there was "no hurry" for the VSO as I was simply on a long wating list at the BVA.  I found out later THIS IS NOT TRUE.  In fact, I did not have a docket number at the BVA, and I would not get one until the DAV completed its "brief" and sent it to the BVA.  This did not happen for 18 months.  

This means that the DAV "sat on my claim" for 18 months before they prepared the brief and sent it to the BVA, and THEN LIED ABOUT IT.  

      After thinking about it, something similar happened when I applied.  I went to a local VSO and filled out the paperwork in March, 2002.  Later, I found out VA did not receive my claim until May 30, 2002.  

I knew it did not take 2 months for the mailman to go a 3 hour drive, but did not know better so I just assumed it was the mail or the Regional Office.  No.  When I sent in my dependent changes, I found out the VSO did not submit that paperwork for 13 months.  (The time limit is a year, so I wound up losing money on dependents, also, compliments of my "free" VSO).  

      The cost of my "free" VSO has amounted to about $8000, as follows:  2 months retro lost while they were finding a stamp and mailing my paperwork (that I already had filled out myself).  Another 3 years of retro lost because the VSO delayed sending in my dependent information for 13 months, and I did not figure that out for 2 more years.  Total cost of free VSO:  $8000.   This should pay the "free" rent for the VSO at the regional office and VAMC for a year or so.  Remember that, the next time someone tells you to get a "free" VSO, or you get "free" burglar alarm when you pay for monitoring.   

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

VSO's have many backgrounds.

A "State and/or County" VSO is hired by the state or county to assist veterans in their respective domains.  They usually work or can be contacted through you local county office.  They are usual veterans in need of a job, and many have a working knowledge on how to get a claim filed, but have limited experience in seeing the process through.  Too few serve for  any length of time that would allow them to become expert.  Too often, a veteran is helping the VSO cut his/her teeth on the VA process.

A "Service Organization" VSO can be found at any level of any service organization.  The higher up they are in their respective organizations, the more likely they are to be effective (but not always).  For example, the VFW has "Service Officers" at each level (Post, District, State, National), but quite frequently they have duties beyond supporting the claims of veterans, even though they are listed as the primary POC for veterans needing help.

The local service officers that are effective are more likely than not, found at the VA Service Offices.  These offices are staffed by the Service Organizations, but seem to have more resources at their fingertips at seem to be more knowledgeable and therefore helpful than the others.

The VSOs at the VARO or BVA might as well be hired guns of the VA.  They work "down the hall", eat in the same cafeteria or eating establishments, attend the same parties, as their VA counterparts.  The are part of the VA Bureaucracy, and "maintaining the peace" is their primary consideration. 

Having said all that, I find that the lawyers serving this market, while well qualified and very helpful, are also part of the same bureaucracy.  They just work in a different building, with different roles and responsibilities, but "maintaining the peace" is still the mission.

JMVHO

TexasMarine

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

The attorney's want their pay ASAP.  The attorney's dont get paid until the retro is distributed.   The attorney's  have a dog in the fight just like we do, , while the VSO gets paid every other Friday, just like the VA employees.  Its not real suprising that, when its "your" paycheck that is delayed, you want it ASAP.  I would like to see them delay congress paychecks whenever their is a VA backlog....and VA execs.  I have said it before, if the Veterans backlog was directly related to VA exec's pay, and congress, we would get our compensation in 2 weeks or less.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

There is only one catch.  The attorneys generally like to maximize their share of the retro.  By delaying the case (for instance) of a vet due to get 100%, they stand to gain $8K - $12K per year delayed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I thought it didn't matter about the VSO or DAV  getting retro? in my case the DAV

Private Attorney's do or any Accredited  certified License Rep  Like Asknod  when he becomes certified to help veterans

 ...My DAV is worthless...so I hadle all my claims two ways  submit online with ebenny's or submit via Post Office with certified return receipt .

That's basically my  Official Stamped Document.

I believe if you get a Reputable Attorney   the retro has no meaning , his meaning would be to get your claim Adjudicated ASAP with full benefits.. the more cases an attorney gets approved is one more feather on his cap and a good Reputation..

 

When we work our claim  its up to us to check in with the VA or who ever we need to check in with about our claims , taking years to adjudicate a claim is ridiculous, with some exceptions of course...but a well grounded claim and proof  of evidence is all you need. 

jmo

 

..........................Buck

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

I used to think the same thing, Texas Marine, until someone pointed out something to me:

If you apply for benefits, and get awarded, you get an effective date and start collecting benefits.  The attorney, if you hire one to get an EED, will only get a percentage of the RETRO, while you continue to get your benefits.  

Example1:

Veteran applies for PTSD in 2001, and gets denied.  He appeals to the BVA and gets his PTSD, but only to 2008.  So, he hires an attorney to collect his retro from 2001-2008.  The attorney manages to get the retro, but delaying the claim a month, a year, or 10 years is of no benefit it to him, since you have been receiving benefits since 2008, and he will only collect retro from 2001, 2008, whenever that occurs.  There is no incentive for the attorney to delay...it just means he gets paid later.  

 

Example 2.  Veteran applies for PTSD in 2001, and gets lowballed at 10%.  The Vet appeals to BVA.  The Vet appeals, and hires a lawyer.  The lawyer wins 70 percent.  Again, there is no incentive for the lawyer to delay, because it means that each month 10 percent more is deducted from the retro, to the effective date.  The lawyer disputes the effective date, and again, see example one.  

 

It just delays payment to the Veteran and the attorney, and there is no incentive for the attorney to delay the claim.  He wants the retro, not the month to month.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hi Broncovet,

Your post is very interesting.  I am now wondering if these (my county) county VSO's can be trusted to do right by a veteran. I have not turned in the form fro my VA doctor yet, California has had rain and people always seem to drive extra crazy in the rain.  My county's VSO is very nice but now I am starting to wonder who does he REALLY work for?  The county or is he an "agent" of the VA with plans to screw up requests for this or that.  As people say "talk is cheap" and thus far I have talked to him twice.  What is the real story?  Thank you.  HG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use