Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

2 Dr.s at my 1 C&P MH is that normal

Rate this question


Rx7mike

Question

Ok today i had a C&P recertification 5yr reeval. I arrived early with my spouse and waited for the Dr. After an hr wait the dr asked if i would mind his colleauge to sit in on the exam with him as he is learning to be a rater. The exam went well i think but before making any notations he would ask the other dr who seemed at least 30yrs on My dr if he had any questions. He did 2 every time he was asked. Then i hear a BOOM and jump they sat looking at me. said its just the toilet. Bullshit sounded like someone dropped a weight on concrete floor right next door.

My C&P was for bipolar it didnt mention my ptsd anxiety or any other MH that where in that group when it was rated at 100%. Now i asked the dr and he said no this is for the Bipolar only which is what i am rated 100% for. We did means test ect then almost at the end the Main dr picked up the DSM 5 and pointed to a line and said to the other dr I think i will be adding this and the other dr conncurred. Adding What?

Can C&P Dr add issues to a reevaluation?

Anyone else have a sit in Dr?

He did state the usual in the begining that this is not random or that i was selected but to verify if i was still Bad, better, or worse. He said he was basing it off of the old C&P that was done. And he did refer to my VA health records and did ask me alot about my violence that has been documented matter of fact that was the most spoken about thing besides my relationships as i stated that i dont have. and with my wife and kids i am distant. My spouse was going to talk to them but they did say that they didnt need anything from her.

Asked if i was doing better on med alot of times i stated that they helped most of the time but i mostly stay to myself at home away from my kids wife ect as i do.

Im gonna have heartburn till i see the C&P in Bluebutton 3 days and today is thursday so probly not till next week some time UGHHHHHH!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I would think it would be the same if you would have had a QTC C & P exam but what a lot of veterans forget is when they have a C & P exam at their VAMC they forget what VAMC stand for which is (Veterans Administration Medical Center) meaning that it is more of a training facility (school) than it is a hospital.  Yes, they like to ask other doctors to come in but you as a patient can refuse.  Also an examiner can add his/her opinion or anything they feel is necessary to your exam. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
8 minutes ago, pete992 said:

I would think it would be the same if you would have had a QTC C & P exam but what a lot of veterans forget is when they have a C & P exam at their VAMC they forget what VAMC stand for which is (Veterans Administration Medical Center) meaning that it is more of a training facility (school) than it is a hospital.  Yes, they like to ask other doctors to come in but you as a patient can refuse.  Also an examiner can add his/her opinion or anything they feel is necessary to your exam. 

I figured that. i guess i was just hard to realize it being stressed and all. they did say it was up to me. Im just waiting now i guess to see his report ill post it when it becomes available im guessing next week sometime. TY. but still he verified i take perscribed meds and still seak treatment so im hoping it gets turned to permanant for champ and less worry.

and im hoping adding is better than removing in this case

Edited by Rx7mike
left out something.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

looked on ebenefits and saw the (increase) after the diagnosis. Its not for an increase its a reevaluation. last time i looked it didnt state increase is that normal its in yellow

Status of Your Claim

Gathering of Evidence

  • Submitted: 01/30/2016 (Compensation)
  • Estimated Completion: 04/13/2016 - 05/22/2016

    The time it takes to complete you claim depends on factors like the type of claim and the type of disability claimed.

    The estimated dates are based on a statistical analysis of historical processing times for similar claims. Some things you should know:

    • Historical data may not accurately predict current conditions. Your claim may take longer.
    • Dates may change as the statistical analysis is updated.
    • Some claims will take longer than the range of dates given as they are based on an average.

    Submitting the supporting documentation that has been requested quickly and electronically is the surest way to get your claim decided as quickly as possible.

  • Disabilities Claimed: BIPOLAR DISORDER, MIXED (ALSO CLAIMED AS ANXIETY DISORDER) (Increase)
  • Representative for VA Claims: AMERICAN LEGION
  • Current Status: Gathering of Evidence
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Asked and Answered. The actual C & P Dr told you why and asked if you minded.

What would cause me concern, if you discovered that both Dr's or Psychologists actually completed and submitted to the Rating Dept,  2 separate and contradicting DBQ's.

Semper Fi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Since you are already service connected at the 100% rate which is the maximum rating the only likely increase would be P & T if you are not already P & T.  The likelihood of both Drs giving two different opinions would be a serious stretch. One may opinion and the other may confirm or agree or not even comment. Really hate to say it but the only thing you can do now is wait and see.  There is no need to stress yourself out.  VA always put that stupid increase thing on ebenifits and you can't trust it at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
2 hours ago, Gastone said:

What would cause me concern, if you discovered that both Dr's or Psychologists actually completed and submitted to the Rating Dept,  2 separate and contradicting DBQ's.

Semper Fi

They did state in front of my my wife and another spouse in the lobby that the 2nd dr was stricktly for observation. Je also said it in the room as well.

1 hour ago, pete992 said:

VA always put that stupid increase thing on ebenifits and you can't trust it at all.

I got wierded out as it wasnt on there i was figuring hoping it was a normal bs thing they put down.

All i did was showup for a reeval and it seemed to go well just some things where different. My point of this post is hopefully another vet who goes through the same thing can possibly look at this and get a little help maybe had same issues. thank you both for helping clear some of this up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use