Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

What to do

Rate this question


Emmanuel727

Question

I was asked to come in to the qtc for evaluation. I am currently 60 percent 30 for COPD and 30 for PTSD . This is my first time doing this since I was awarded. Some years ago..  Since my last eval my life has gotten worst wife left took the kids.. Can't keep a job.. Regular people just all around piss me off.. I saw some wild shit over seas I think about it daily... It got worse when my kids where born.. Looking at my baby's happy one moment then afraid the next reliving the things I seen over seas.. I'm very nervous and don't know what these QTC people want or what there real goal is.. Someone help me please I'm freaking out.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

If your being treated by a Non VA Psychiatrist or Psychologist PhD, you might be able to get them to complete a VA DBQ.

As for getting your VA PTSD DR to complete a DBQ, good luck with that. See the VA DBQ discussion regarding VA Dr's compliance with completing Vet Requested DBQs, especially MH Clinicians & PTSD. You'll note, your VA MH Dr is  instructed to hand off your DBQ request, to another Psychiatrist that is and has not been involved directly with you.

If you think you rate an increase and your MH Clinician Notes support your Increase, file an FDC. If the Clinician's notes aren't enough, you were going to get another PTSD C & P anyway. The C & P Dr's opinion trumps, all others.

Semper Fi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Usually the C&P Examiner has already read  the veteran files/ records and has a better understanding about your claim.

My PTSD Examiner mention to me she was a license psychiatrist PHD and had a week to go over my files before C&P Exam...My PTSD C&P Exam took only about 90 minutes.

And it seem to cover everything that needed to be covered.

I was rated at 70%  PTSD but had most of the symptoms that would warrant a 100%  rating but I have good hygiene still and dress causal /Shave so in my opinion that's why I was rated 70%. so already being rated at TDIU P&T for a different disability at 100%, that qualified me to meet the statatory Criteria for SMC-S

So I am rated at the scheduled 100% with SMC -S  H.B.

 Of course I agree with the decision.

..........Buck

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

DoT09, I feel you. In days of yesteryear, the VA went along with that thinking. However, that all changed with the recent (? 13 or 14) VA Regs regarding PTSD C & P Forensic DBQs trumping all others and the use of the DSM V.  Check out the reasons for no-longer giving GAF Scores the same considerations in the Rating Decision.   2+ MH Dr's could come up with vastly (8+Point) different GAF Scores for the same Vet, over the same period.

On a personal note, I saw a non VA PTSD Psychologist PhD for about 4 months, back in early 08. At our 1st meeting, he indicated that I definitely had PTSD symptoms that were treatable. Looking back, can't say I recall anything Forensic in nature, about that or subsequent therapy sessions. There was no mention by him, regarding filing a VA Comp Claim for PTSD, then or anytime in the near future. He did advise me that at the end of an about a 2 yr treatment program, he would be able to write, what amounted to an "Individual Unemployability Letter."  The weekly therapy sessions with his assistant, didn't seem to be helping, thought I was wasting my money.

 Late 2010, VA Sleep Clinician said he was sure I had PTSD, referred me to MH, ended up in Group. PTSD C&P mid 11, Awarded SC70 09/11 (IU Inferred), only Clinician Evidence listed as considered, was the C & P Psychiatrist's DBQ.

IU Denied 2012, Awarded DRO Hearing 6/14.

Semper Fi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use