Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

What Does "may Be Caused By" Mean Va Wise

Rate this question


OnRiver

Question

  • Answers 19
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Onriver

If you have diabetes and PN then there is a much better than likely chance the two things are related. Get a real doctor to connect the dots for you. I have DMII and PN and it was service connected, but I had to fight for it. PN is a very common secondary condition to DMII. That doctor is just tap dancing around. There is no diagnosis that says "maybe". You can't win service connection with a "maybe". I am not being funny. You need something like "as likely as not" to get service connected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear John

Thanks for your comments and input. I don't have the money to see a dr. for another opinion. I kind of read this as if their was only two reasons for the Perehial neuropathy ...a either or when he states...."The periperhial neuropathies may be secondary to long-standing diabetes or small fiber painful type." The va turned me down the first time because of the false assumption that EMG's ruled out diabetic neuropathies which it does not. That has been noted in my file. Al;so since I only claimed nueroptjies of the lower extremeties I can still claim upper ones as they have now been shown by examinations to be there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Onriver

I went through the same BS about my PN. The VA granted 10% for each lower extremity but denied the upper PN based on the same evidence. I appealed this and won and so can you, but you need a medical opinion!!!! The C&P doctor should have given you a physical exam to determine sensory loss. Not all PN shows up on an EMG, as you say. You should have the benefit of the doubt on this matter. For the doctor to make a statement like "maybe" is irresponsible. They know that PN is a major secondary condition of longstanding DMII. Ask the VA for another C&P exam to make a determination as to the fact of your PN being secondary to the DMII. You got an inadequate exam. Ask your primary care doctor to send you to the neurologist for an opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

It does not sound like the statement was written for the purpose of adjudication and was only a justification for his treatment plan. Take him the nexus form.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest rickb54

OnRiver,

Stated," "Maybe caused by" really means in VA jargon?"

It means the doctor is not sure if the problem was caused by....

For a va claim you will need a statement that reads;

it is more likely than not that the present condition is caused by ______ or;

it is as least as likely as not that the present condition is caused by______.

If your trying to get service connection for a new conditon, the doctor needs to indicate he has reviewed your active duty medical records, and he also needs to justify his opinion.

If your trying to get a condition service connected as a secondary issue, than it may not be necessary to review the active duty medical records. But the opinion still needs to be justified.

You don't need any special forms or letters for the va to accept the statement.

Your doctor can write this statement right in the medical record, it is eaiser for him to do this, and it is faster than having to dictate a letter, and then having it typed on letterhead. It is also cheaper and less time consumming for him to write it in the medical record.

Hope this helps...

Edited by rickb54
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 3 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use