Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Nod Sent Months Ago

Rate this question


Angela

Question

I filed a CUE (clear and unmistakable error) claim last year, which was quickly denied. I've already sent in my NOD (notice of disagreement) - about 6 months ago - but haven't gotten a statement of case yet.

In my CUE I pointed out that the RO had incorrectly interpreted the diagnostic code criteria when rating my condition. I supported my argument with previous decisions of the BVA that spelled out how the criteria was to be interpreted and applied. Then I pointed out that the supreme court (in Gardner) ruled that veteran's are entitled to the most advantageous interpretation of ambiguous rules.

Since then I discovered (by reading the Nicholson v Smith - 2006 FedCir decision) that since the VA has previously provided a publicly available (via bva's decision website) interpretation of my diagnostic code, I was entitled to application of that interpretation -under the Chevron standard of statutory interpretation.

My question is... Can I still submit this additional argument to support my NOD?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

sure

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Larry is Correct-

(By the way Larry -a picture of Red Cloud is on my PC-he was part of our USMC warfare studies at school-it is amazing the warfare knowledge one gets that can be applied to VA claims)

Angela- a vet can send evidence right up to the very minute a BVA lawyer puts pen in hand to sign off-

You sound like that CUE was dynamite- I love the evidence you used-

they denied a CUE I filed in 2004 but I immediately asked for reconsideration and sent them more VA case law and their own regs in M21-1 that pertain to my CUE issue. They told me they began working on the CUE again as soon as they got my recon request-

I had to state some of it very strongly.

Established VA regulations and VA case law, to include a General Counsel Opinion fully suppored my CUE.

The actual basis of their denial- is WRONG, I told them in the recon request-as the evidence they said that was lacking is right in my c file, confirmed by my receipt of the c file-

it was right on top of my copy and can easily be found attached to other VA documents they have from General Counsel and VACO on another matter (plus in an award they made to me in 1998)

as well as referenced in my initial DIC claim.

I didnt send them what they said was missing-

they already have it- but if they ask me, I will send it again-with the proof of mailing. They got it in 1994 and awarded on it already. DUH!

It is critical to my CUE.

How can the VA say they do not have evidence of a claim filed in 1995 by my husband (in the c file of course) that I re-opened word for word and won FTCA and Sec 1151 on already? Double DUH!

You have done a GREAT Job-let's hope they do----

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
I filed a CUE (clear and unmistakable error) claim last year, which was quickly denied. I've already sent in my NOD (notice of disagreement) - about 6 months ago - but haven't gotten a statement of case yet.

In my CUE I pointed out that the RO had incorrectly interpreted the diagnostic code criteria when rating my condition. I supported my argument with previous decisions of the BVA that spelled out how the criteria was to be interpreted and applied. Then I pointed out that the supreme court (in Gardner) ruled that veteran's are entitled to the most advantageous interpretation of ambiguous rules.

Since then I discovered (by reading the Nicholson v Smith - 2006 FedCir decision) that since the VA has previously provided a publicly available (via bva's decision website) interpretation of my diagnostic code, I was entitled to application of that interpretation -under the Chevron standard of statutory interpretation.

My question is... Can I still submit this additional argument to support my NOD?

You can add evidence at any time, including your argument. If this is on appeal at the BVA level, you should waive the VARO's (AOJ) deciding on this evidence or the BVA will send it back to the AOJ, as they get first shot at it. jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 3 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use