Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

SMC (S1)

Rate this question


25Unifrom50

Question

I received this notice on eBenifits after my claim was complete. Is this a permanent deal or is this a temporary award.

 

Entitled to special monthly compensation under 38 U.S.C. 1114, subsection (s) and 38 CFR 3.350(i) on account of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (also claimed as acquired psychiatric condition) rated 100 percent and additional service-connected disabilities of diabetes mellitus type II, right lower extremity radiculopathy (also claimed as lower extremity diabetic neuropathy), axillary cyst (claimed as cyst under arm), pseudofolliculitis barbae and tinea pedis (formerly evaluated separately as DC 7806 pseudofolliculitis barbae and DC 7820-7806 tinea pedis), right knee patellofemoral syndrome, patellofemoral spurring and arthritis, obstructive sleep apnea with bronchitis (formerly evaluated as bronchitis), ventral hernia, lumbar spine strain with degenerative disc disease, hypertension (claimed as high blood pressure), left knee patellofemoral syndrome, left lower extremity radiculopathy (also claimed as lower extremity diabetic neuropathy), degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine (claimed as cervical spine injury), erectile dysfunction, irritable bowel syndrome (claimed as functional GI disorder), headaches, independently ratable at 60 percent or more from 07/10/2017 to 10/01/2017.

Rating Date : 01/08/2018

 

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Well my belief is how do u filling a letter or a form for something that is to be inferred by your record.

If u get tdiu you are not able to work 

If they didn't send the form how would u no to fill something out. I think ppl are making it more than it is it law

Howell was denied because the bva said he could go to medical appointment so he can't be housebound.

The court rule against that and made it clear confined to one home is not been able to leave home to make a income.

It was a cavc case that was remand back to bva 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I'm 100 % P&T SMC-S.  100% PTSD/TBI and a host of other disabilities equaling way over 60%.  I told all C&P examiners I work part time flex.  Mostly from home, and sometimes go into the office.  I make good money.  I'm self employed as part of the family business (sheltered employment so to speak).  I doubt the VA looked into my yearly income.  I never told them how much I make.  They never asked.  I learned less is more during C&P exams.  

Prior to being self employed I got kicked out of two different colleges and fired from a host of jobs.  That wouldn't change if I didn't do what I am doing now; fact!  I'd get shit canned from any job within short period of time.  Probably thrown in jail too.  Especially after being self employed now for 16 years.  It's gotten worse over the years to the point I only have a few years left if I'm lucky.

My understanding is I'm a rare case.  And a head case too.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

First you are 100 not tdiu so u can work as much as u want. With no problem

U were give a smc s because u are a 100 and have other issue that add up to the 60. Which has nothing to do with housebound.

Smc s housebound by fact which is for veterans who can't leave there home to make a income.

Like the court stated been confined to one home doesn't mean one can't leave home at all howell v nicholson

Court rule confine to one home is not been able to leave to make a income.

There are 3 way as I see it to smc s.

Bedridden 100 plus the 60 or been confined to one home.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Mr Cue here is what I don't understand,, they inferred the SMC S H.B.   DUE TO MY SINGLE 90%DISABILITY AND ON TDIU P&T  AND HAD A SEPERATE AND DISTINK CONDITON RATED AT 70% (Chronic PTSD).IN OCT 2015

When I received the TDIU P&T  IT WAS BASED OFF MY SERVERE PROFOUND HEARING LOSS, MY JOB I HAD AND HAD BEEN TRAINED TO DO REQUIRE GOOD HEARING.

.I HAD TO STOP WORKING BECAUSE OF IT,  I WENT TO THE VA FOR THEM TO TEST MY HEARING BECAUSE IT WAS FREE AND THE AUDOLOGIST THAT TESTED ME SAID I SHOULD FILE A CLAIM FOR THAT,  I STARTED LOSSING MY HEARING AT A EARLY AGE AND BY THE TIME i TURN 40 I knew I had a hearing problem and it kept getting worse and worse  so I filed a claim and was denied in 1998my age then was 48/49  and  I appeal and was established service connection at 0%  because they said my hearing loss did not meet the rating criteria  that the VA has  I took another hearing test from the VA  and then went got a private test and had the Dr to go by all the VA Guidelines...I reopen my claim in 1999  and was given a 50% rating in 6 months with the private Dr Test, 50% from a 0% within 6 months? 

 

 anyway I was happy just to get the 50%  I went for an increase on my hearing loss at age51 and a C&P examiner messed up everything  he claim I never had a hearing problem when I got Military he went back and found that test...

1972  when I got out.

 So at the new C&P EXAM FOR THE INCREASE  his Audiologist had thought I was Malangering (lying) about my hearing loss...and I should not have been service connected at 50% in the first place  and recommend i be reduced of the 50% and stirp form service connection...ok I got a letter to reduce my 50% rating to 0% but could keep the service connection.so naturally this made me request a DRO Hearing at my R.O.    TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM AND KEEP WHAT I HAD AND POSSIBLE AN INCREASE.

I went to my private Dr to retest my hearing and requested a DRO HEARING and at that hearing the DRO WENT with my private Dr and not the VA Dr  going back to my end of service test would not matter in this case due to the fact that it takes noise induced bilateral hearing loss years to lose a person hearing..

.anyway this is when I got the increase and not a decrease   he even stated with a Senior DRO and a Rating specialist Representive  at my hearing it is obvious this veterans hearing loss is real and according to this Veterans evidence and new hearing test that was done using the VA HEARING TESTING REQUIRMENTS a increase will be granted and not a decrease  and he gave me 30% increases on my hearing loss and  he also gave me tinnitus 10%  that I had been denied previously  from this same VA ENT Dr and his Audiologist to equal 90%  so because I could not work and had a letter from Voc Rehab that it was not feasible to retrain this veteran at this time due to his sc disability  I used that letter As my evidence  and they gave me the TDIU P&T  BUT NOT THE  SMC S  H.B. THIS WAS Dec 10th 2002...Oct 1st 2015 is when I did get the SMC S due to the PTSD CLAIM AT 70%  THEY NOW HAVE ME LISTED WITH A FINAL 100% DEGREE RATING WITH SMC S H.B.

I WAS JUST WONDERING WHY THEY NEVER INFERRED ME THE SMC S H.B. BACK THEN   OR GIVE IT TO ME WHEN HOWELL vs Nicholson was won in the court back on MARCH 23 2006..

IF SMC S H.B. IS A STATUAORY RATING? I (which  it is) 

IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN INFERRED TO ME   JUSTLIKE IT WAS WHEN I DID GET IT WITH THIS OTHER 70% RATING..

I think it is that some people do not know if I am entitled to it or not and just wants me to file to see what they say as for as giving me a favorable decision.

i CAN'T AFFORD AN ATTORNEY  SO IF I FILE THIS  THEY EITHER WILL GO BACK TO THE DATE i GOT THE iu or the Howell date he won...or just flat out deny me and give me a reason  maybe thats what everyone is waiting on  what will the VA DECISION BE? AM I ELIGABLE OR NOT?

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
1 hour ago, Mr cue said:

First you are 100 not tdiu so u can work as much as u want. With no problem

U were give a smc s because u are a 100 and have other issue that add up to the 60. Which has nothing to do with housebound.

Smc s housebound by fact which is for veterans who can't leave there home to make a income.

Like the court stated been confined to one home doesn't mean one can't leave home at all howell v nicholson

Court rule confine to one home is not been able to leave to make a income.

There are 3 way as I see it to smc s.

Bedridden 100 plus the 60 or been confined to one home.

 

 

Thank you for clarifying.  You know there is another forum with a certain rater on it that says the VA (in the future) is probably going to re-access 100% Vets that are still working.  Especially one's with 100% mental.  I'll retire if this happens.  But I sure do pay a lot of taxes in the mean time.  

Sorry for getting off course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Buck I think u are look at it to deep.

If u had or was granted tdiu based on one condition. They should have inferred  smc s.

 

They only seem to inferr it when veterans get granted the extra 60.

They gave me 3 month because I got a extra 70. After I apply for housebound by fact.

But never address me been confined to my home for 25 years

I have  not seen a decision were they inferred smc s housebound by fact. It was always the veteran who ask or apply for it.

Even howell apply and they denied it  they didn't inferr it for him. The va is aware of this but there not going to just grant ever tdiu veteran smc s retro  and they are violating the law.

This my belief

I will post the outcome of my case.

Once it return to board they have to rule on it or I am back to the court I will not let it go until I get a decision.

My case is moving because I put in for expidate at the us court and was granted by the court. The bva are move on it pretty fast

So I feel it will not be long.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use