Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Need Opinions

Rate this question


63Charlie

Question

Am rated at 0% fro scars.

Applied for an increase.

Had a C&P examination for the increased scar rating.

The DBQ of the examiner clearly pointed out two characteristics of scars which would have entitled a rating of 30%

Instead of granting the increased rating, the VA failed to award an increase and failed to send a written decision notification giving the rationale used for no increased rating for scars.

After calling and sending an IRIS inquiry on the status of the adjudication of my increase, I am told that the VA placed my denial of an increase back into NOD/Appeal queue.

By failing to provide the required written notification/decision letter informing why my increase was not awarded, I have the opinion that the VA committed a CUE

i defer this to the more experienced forum members for advice.

To CUE, or not to CUE, is my question.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

63 charlie

can you post a redacted copy of your denial? what their reasons and bases were in the decision .

black out all your personal info name and claim # ect,,,ect,,

also remember the new skin rating change as of 8/13/18

Make sure the examining physicians take COLOR PHOTOS of every scar in addition to clear and detailed measurements and descriptions to ensure you receive a proper rating for your condition.

source: Military Made Easy''

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

This is what they did to me with my TBi in 2010 and then I filed a cue after not reasoning a reason as to why the denied it the judge ends up  at the BVA telling my attorney it’s not a CUE since they never issued a SOC but just the denial. And grants everything on my claim 6 years later so Yeha i think he was wrong since i had a reconsideration denial and a DRO denial as well and because the first one was never done right he said it’s technically still pending so by default cannot be a CUE. I was so pissed but the retro made my anger fade away....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

The problem with filing a Cue on "failure to adjuticate" an issue is because you need to remember:

Quote

VA has an "unlimited time" to process your claim.  

So, if you CUE VA for failing to adjuticate an issue in 1975, the VA can say, 

"Gee, isnt that backlog awful?  We will get to your 1975 claim as soon as we can.  Sorry about the delay, but that is not CUE."  

Then, they send you a denial letter when they "get a ROUND Tuit".  

Time is not on our side, the VA can simply wait until we die to adjuticate our claims, no matter how long it is.  

A CUE error only applies to an adjuticated claim.  A "pending claim" is not ripe for CUE, you can not file a CUE on a claim which has not been adjuticated.  Same with a NOD.  You can not file a nod on an issue which is pending.  

This creates a real legal problem for Vets.  You can consider filing a writ of mandamus for unreasonable delay of adjuticating  a very old claim.  https://www.veteranslawblog.org/writ-of-mandamus/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Agreed but I do have to say emailing the secretary about my cue claim and Hickey and Ted Ebert sparked something and I received calls From the RO about my then pending appeal which they then took action filed Nod/cue in Dec 2015 claim decided by May 2016 after my emails and calls to case management of course... sending a polite email to Mr Ebert who is in a different role will still help you out if he can

Edited by jfrei
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Ronald beecher went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      First Post
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use