Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

What's my next step? BVA remand being returned to Board

Rate this question


Kelly Severance

Question

Hello Hadit community,

I received an IRIS response a couple of days ago regarding my husbands Grant/Remand from BVA.  Based on the letter, my grant is being worked at the RO and is "pending" review.  The Remand (for TDIU) is at the ARC, but is soon to be sent back to BVA for a final decision (which means it was denied, I think).  The letter is below.  My question:  We recently (this week) got a letter from my husband's doctor stating that in his opinion, he is unable to work and unemployable due to his disabilities.  Should we go ahead and send this in?  If so, where?  To the BVA, ARC or both?  Or should we wait on the SSOC?  

Also, any other interpretations of the letter?  Thanks for any help!

Here is a portion of the letter:

It appears a decision has been made on a portion of your appeal. At this time, our records indicate the decision is pending review and processing at your regional office. No other action is needed from you at this time. However, if further information is needed you will receive notification by mail. We are sorry that we are unable to give you a timeframe for this final stage in the appeals process. We appreciate your continued patience. 


A review of our electronic records indicates at this time your file is physically located at the Appeals Management Center, in Washington D.C.. Your file is being prepared and reviewed to be sent back to the Board of Veterans Appeals (BVA) for a final decision. Prior to it being sent to the BVA you should be provided a Supplemental Statement of the Case that will detail any new information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

If you have new evidence, send it in.  Yea, it may delay it, but without key evidence, you are looking at a denial, and the delays would be much longer.  As one person said, if you dont have time to do it right the first time, when will you have time to do it over?  

The letter says you should wait.  But dont wait on sending new evidence, if you have any "new" evidence that is important.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

That's what I thought.  I guess I could send a copy to the ARC and the BVA.  When we told his VSO about the IRIS response, she did not have anything in her system about it being sent back, but she told my husband to "wait" on the SSOC.  That just didn't seem like the best move to me....Thanks Broncovet!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I would speak to the ARC first I did and they actually emailed me the decision 6 days after it closed.‭(202) 530-9455‬. If you get a copy of the decision page two states this to expedite it back to the BVA for a faster decision any new evidence send to them for the decision to be made instead of wasting time with the RO especially if the retro is relatively high the RO will deny deny deny ... This is my first ever decision I ever recieved by email that was only done from talking to the ARC director that same day I signed page two and emailed it back it was returned back to the BVA appeal closed 9/6.  Still took 3 months total but reduced a crazy  amount of wait time. I don’t think you can appeals-comms.amo@va.gov

IMG_3589.pdf

Edited by jfrei
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

If you get a denial from the BVA, then this is a perfect time to appeal, but do so quickly as you have only 120 days to appeal a BVA decision.  

A fresh BVA denial is the perfect time to hire an attorney.  Most of the time, EAJA will pay your attorney fees, so why not go with a pro, when it costs no more than a VSO? 

Incidently, I have taken my own advice, and hired an attorney, Chris Attig, to represent me at the CAVC.  I expect to have a CAVC result before the end of this year.   

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

But if they send it without waiving the RO review it will Delay there appeal with the BVA their reason because the new evidence might change. The RO view except it doesn’t do a thing except delay it to the BVA who might see the same evidence and grant the appeal. I’ve had this happen twice already. Wishfully thinking gets old... just call the ARC talk to the director explain your concerns see if she directs your call to the employee working your claim...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use