Jump to content


  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
victor Gilkes

prostate approved

Question

Hi Everyone.  Rec'd approval for prostate cancer due to service connection with Herbicide exposure.  They gave me 20% after my C&P exam.  I told them I have go get up at night to use the bathroom 3-4 times and have to use bathroom during daytime every 2-3 hours.  They stated I would have gotten a bigger increase if I used the bathroom 5 times at night and every hour during the daytime. It already causes a inconvenience getting up 3-4 times at night and looking for a bathroom while out in public. 

Can I appeal the decision they made?  If so, what do I need to write up for the appeal?  Thanks for your support.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

After doing some research for you there is a possibility that you were rated incorrectly. You may need to appeal.

I'm not trying to get your hopes up because this info requires it to be scrutinized by our more experienced members. I invite other members to please correct me if I'm wrong with any of the information provided.

 

You are SC for prostate cancer.  Prostate cancer, code 7528

Were you ever treated for it at a VA facility/other facility? Did you receive a temporary 100% rating while you were being treated for prostate cancer? Is the prostate cancer still active? Is it inactive now?

Code 7529: Benign tumors affecting the genitourinary system are rated based on how they affect the systems around them. For example, if the condition interferes with renal functioning, then it would be rated under the renal rating system.

 

Code 7528: Malignant cancer is rated 100% while it is active. This 100% rating will continue for the first 6 months after the last treatment. The condition will then be reevaluated. If it is no longer active, then it is rated on any lasting symptoms like a benign condition.

 

Notice the last sentence "If it is no longer active it is rated on any lasting symptoms like a benign condition". This is telling the rater to refer to code 7529.

7529 Benign neoplasms of the genitourinary system:
Rate as voiding dysfunction or renal dysfunction, whichever is predominant.

 

Code 7529 clearly states what you should have been rated as VOIDING DYSFUNCTION. Regardless, of what  your urinary frequency  symptoms are. Code 7529 clearly does not state to RATE AS URINARY DYSFUNCTION. It appears you were erroneously or deliberately rated to low-ball you. Why? This is the only rational explanation I could come up with below.

If they rated you as Voiding Dysfunction ; and your symptoms were to become worse (which they may get worse over time) Urinary Frequency is capped at 40%. VOIDING DYSFUNCTION is capped at 60%.

Urinary Frequency: A condition is rated under this system if it causes the body to urinate more often than normal. If you have to urinate 5 or more times during the night, or if you have to urinate more than every hour during the day, it is rated 40%. If you have to urinate 3 or 4 times during the night, or if you have to urinate every 1 to 2 hours during the day, it is rated 20%. If you have to urinate 2 times during the night, or if you have to urinate every 2 to 3 hours during the day, it is rated 10%.

Voiding Dysfunction: All urinary conditions that cannot be rated as urinary frequency or obstructed voiding are rated by this system. If the condition requires the use of a catheter or other urinary assistive appliance to remove urine from the bladder, or if the condition requires the use of absorbent materials (like pads or Depends) that must be changed more than 4 times a day, then it is rated 60%. If it requires absorbent materials that must be changed 2 to 4 times a day, then it is rated 40%. If it requires absorbent materials that must be changed only once a day, then it is rated 20%.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Yes, you can appeal.  Mostly you need evidence that you qualify for the higher disability rating, to win your appeal.  If you have such evidence, I recommend an appeal  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Doc25, I appreciate your response.  I will look into it with my VSO.  I too felt they low balled me.  I have not given up the fight!  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
On 2/13/2019 at 12:54 AM, doc25 said:

After doing some research for you there is a possibility that you were rated incorrectly. You may need to appeal.

I'm not trying to get your hopes up because this info requires it to be scrutinized by our more experienced members. I invite other members to please correct me if I'm wrong with any of the information provided.

 

You are SC for prostate cancer.  Prostate cancer, code 7528

Were you ever treated for it at a VA facility/other facility? Did you receive a temporary 100% rating while you were being treated for prostate cancer? Is the prostate cancer still active? Is it inactive now?

Code 7529: Benign tumors affecting the genitourinary system are rated based on how they affect the systems around them. For example, if the condition interferes with renal functioning, then it would be rated under the renal rating system.

 

Code 7528: Malignant cancer is rated 100% while it is active. This 100% rating will continue for the first 6 months after the last treatment. The condition will then be reevaluated. If it is no longer active, then it is rated on any lasting symptoms like a benign condition.

 

Notice the last sentence "If it is no longer active it is rated on any lasting symptoms like a benign condition". This is telling the rater to refer to code 7529.

7529 Benign neoplasms of the genitourinary system:
Rate as voiding dysfunction or renal dysfunction, whichever is predominant.

 

Code 7529 clearly states what you should have been rated as VOIDING DYSFUNCTION. Regardless, of what  your urinary frequency  symptoms are. Code 7529 clearly does not state to RATE AS URINARY DYSFUNCTION. It appears you were erroneously or deliberately rated to low-ball you. Why? This is the only rational explanation I could come up with below.

If they rated you as Voiding Dysfunction ; and your symptoms were to become worse (which they may get worse over time) Urinary Frequency is capped at 40%. VOIDING DYSFUNCTION is capped at 60%.

Urinary Frequency: A condition is rated under this system if it causes the body to urinate more often than normal. If you have to urinate 5 or more times during the night, or if you have to urinate more than every hour during the day, it is rated 40%. If you have to urinate 3 or 4 times during the night, or if you have to urinate every 1 to 2 hours during the day, it is rated 20%. If you have to urinate 2 times during the night, or if you have to urinate every 2 to 3 hours during the day, it is rated 10%.

Voiding Dysfunction: All urinary conditions that cannot be rated as urinary frequency or obstructed voiding are rated by this system. If the condition requires the use of a catheter or other urinary assistive appliance to remove urine from the bladder, or if the condition requires the use of absorbent materials (like pads or Depends) that must be changed more than 4 times a day, then it is rated 60%. If it requires absorbent materials that must be changed 2 to 4 times a day, then it is rated 40%. If it requires absorbent materials that must be changed only once a day, then it is rated 20%.

 

 

 

So my condition has gotten worst.  This has caused an increase of voiding dysfunction.  I am using the bathroom at least 5 times at night and every hour.  I have been going to an urologist at the DC VA med center.  He has prescribed two meds, Mirabegron and Tamsulosin to curb the amount of times I go to the bathroom.  Sometimes it works and most times it does not!  I need to put in for an increase.  It also has caused ED to become frequently.  It must be from the side effects of the meds.  Is this under voiding dysfunction?

So my condition has gotten worst.  This has caused an increase of voiding dysfunction.  I am using the bathroom at least 5 times at night and every hour.  I have been going to an urologist at the DC VA med center.  He has prescribed two meds, Mirabegron and Tamsulosin to curb the amount of times I go to the bathroom.  Sometimes it works and most times it does not!  I need to put in for an increase.  It also has caused ED to become frequently.  It must be from the side effects of the meds.  Is this under voiding dysfunction?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Victor, this is an old thread. Did you appeal your decision for a higher rate as advised before? What is the status of it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Any one heard of this , I filed a claim for this secondary to hypertension, I had a echo cardiogram, that stated the diagnosis was this heart disease. my question is what is the rating for this. attached is the Echo.

      doc00580220191213082945.pdf
      • 7 replies
    • Need your support - T-shirts Available - Please buy a mug or a membership
      if you have been thinking about subscribing to an ad-free forum or buying a mug now would a very helpful time to do that.

      Thank you for your support
      • 18 replies
    • OK everyone thanks for all the advice I need your help I called VSO complained about length of time on Wednesday of this week today I checked my E benefits and my ratings are in for my ankles that they were denying me 10% for each bilateral which makes 21% I was originally 80% now they’re still saying I’m 80% 

      I’m 50% pes planus 30% migraine headaches 20% lumbar 10% tinnitus and now bilateral 21% so 10% left and right ankle Can someone else please do the math because I come up with 86% which makes me 90 what am I missing please help and thank you
    • I was denied SC for IBS and GERD IN 2011. In 2019 I was awarded SC for GERD. This CUE  is for 2011, both GERD and IBS. There are some odd aspects regarding the 2011 decision, the way it was written and the C&P report and the way it was written. I've tried to present this as clearly as I can. Note: the decision contradicts itself. the decision also contradicts the C&P Report. Honestly, I think the rater just got confused because the C&P was so poorly written. *THIS CUE HAS NOT YET BEEN SUBMITTED*Please let me know what you think. Appreciate all comments and suggestions. Thanks.

       

      VA RATING DECISION MARCH 23 2011 GERD IBS.pdf C P REPORT 7312010 GERD IBS.pdf GERD IBS CUE 2011(1).pdf

      C P ADDENDUM REQUEST RE DIAGNOSIS 7232010.pdf
      • 56 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines