Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Upper Extremity Radiculopathy Rating

Rate this question


RBrogen

Question

Hey Everyone,


Quick question/validation on C&P and rating.  I had a C&P in January that diagnosed my upper extremity radiculopathy as mild and affecting all 3 radicular groups and Ulnar nerve as incomplete paralysis mild right (dominant side), left side was diagnosed normal.  The overall rating wound up at 20% Left and 20% Right side.

I just had a new C&P that diagnosed upper extremity radiculopathy as moderate and affecting left and right lower radicular group and Ulna nerve as incomplete paralysis moderate Left & Right sides

Question 1:  Do they give a rating to both the diagnosis for 3 radicular groups and the Ulnar nerve damage or just one of those?  They list it separately  and 38CFR.

Question 2:  If I am reading the rating properly then it should be something like this:

    - Radiculopathy Upper Extremity Right affecting lower radicular group, incomplete moderate paralysis (dominant hand) - 40%

   - Radiculopathy Upper Extremity Left affecting all lower radicular group, incomplete moderate paralysis (non-dominant hand) - 30%

   - Incomplete  Moderate Paralysis of Ulnar Nerve dominant arm - 30%

   - Incomplete Moderate Paralysis of Ulnar Nerve non-dominant arm - 20%

 

Edited by RBrogen

rackamall.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

RBrogen

 Your more than likely correct here if they list them desperate  but

The only thing to watch here is  pyramiding

https://www.hillandponton.com/pyramiding-affects-va-claims/

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
2 hours ago, Buck52 said:

RBrogen

 Your more than likely correct here if they list them desperate  but

The only thing to watch here is  pyramiding

https://www.hillandponton.com/pyramiding-affects-va-claims/

If it is considered pyramiding to do both then I assume the higher of the 2 ratings would be used correct?

rackamall.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

RBrogen

I believe that there are lawyers and claims agents that specialize in these situations. It might be worth it to bounce it off one of them and see what they say. If they work off the same compensation scale as they do for appeals, they would only get paid (20%) if you won. So, if they take the case you can assume they have a certain degree of confidence of a win. Wouldn't cost you anything out of pocket, just a piece of the back pay for a higher rate. I don't know how you would go about doing it by yourself, because its just your opinion vs. theirs. Might be worth exploring

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
3 hours ago, NoZZZ's said:

Did you appeal to get a higher rating, or was the new C&P for a new claim for increase?

It's a bit complicated but the gist is I filed a claim that included neck,  and knees (was awarded 10% neck, 10% left knee and 10% right knee).  I filed a higher-level review that didn't get done so I had to file a supplemental claim because they didn't consider Reverse Lordosis and torn meniscus in both knees which are direct conditions for 20% for each claimed condition.

Now, while this claim was being bounced around and closed without adjudication because the VA had an Independence Day Challenge for their raters to close X number of claims to get an extra day off on July 5th 2019, I filed another claim which contained 7 additional conditions including bilateral shin splints and jaw and that clam was also screwed up because of a demonstrable inadequate C&P exam and a couple of items were denied, another lowballed and the rest were deferred.

Ultimately what I think has happened is that they are running both of these claim in parallel because I just had my 2nd C&P in a month and the first one on July 10 covered deferred items in second claim and the latest one on Aug 6th covered conditions in both claims.

rackamall.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use