Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Timeline for Supplemental Claim

Rate this question


doctorevil

Question

I recently filed a claim to increase my service connected sinusitis, which is currently at 0%. My claim was filed 14 APR 2019, and was closed/denied  07 AUG 2019. 

Upon reviewing my files, the litany of evidence that I submitted to support my claim, which included records from my PCP and ENT showing were I had been to the doctor multiple occasions over the last two years, and where I was diagnosed with Chronic Sinusitis and Recurrent Acute Sinusitis just disappeared. I had also submitted a sworn statement from my fiance where she detailed my how many sinus infections per year I have experienced, along with describing my symptoms. Keep in mind that sinusits is rated based on the frequency of occurrences; either incapacitating or non-incapacitating. My evidence shows I have enough instances of both to be rated at the 30% level, not taking into consideration extra-scheduler ratings. 

For what ever reason, they did see one document, which was from my ENT, where the diagnosis is very clearly stated and the document contains the same information that would be articulated in a DBQ. 

Nevertheless, the BVA ignored my ENT's statement, and they went with the only other evidence they had, the C&P exam, which was conducted by a GP, not an ENT, and lasted a mere three minutes. 

I was able to have my VSO obtain a copy of their denial on 8 AUG, and I submitted a supplemental claim with the original evidence they lost/failed to review on 9 AUG. 

On 22 AUG, I checked VA.gov and saw that my claim was closed. It now states "The Veterans Benefits Administration made a decision" and under issues states, "Currently on Review - Compensation issue."

To me this seems extraordinarily fast; only 10 working days. I think my case is strong, and at a very minimum I should be rated at least 10%. I would like to think they saw the evidence and adjudicated the case quickly. 

Neither eBenefits or VA.gov has any information. My AB8 has not updated and my rated conditions have not changed. I hoping that eBenefits is slow to catch up, but I'm not optimistic. 

If the VA weighed the evidence properly this would take me from 91%, with a bilateral factor of 2.7 to 100%, as I believe that I qualify for at least a 30% rating based on the frequency of my condition.

Since its the weekend I'm now waiting for the BBE to appear, or not. Hopefully, the VSO can shed some light on what has happened. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Claim closed out today, and I was rated for the maximum. No, thankfully vetquest, I didn't have to ply her with alcohol or get her flowers. I'm not sure why they told me anything. I was prepared to get the standard your claim is being worked lecture, but this was quite surprising. 

On the down side it looks like they jacked up my ED, so I will have to file a HLR for that. The put the ED as the date I filed my second supplemental and not the date that I filed the claim. 

All in all, I would say that I am happy with the process. I started on April 14, and after two appeals, I finally got a sane resolution after 7 months.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use