Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Appealing Ramp Decision

Rate this question


awgv001

Question

I opted into ramp (2018), and my claims were processed quickly (2019), all denied - Would the appropriate form attached move my claim along via RAMP though it has been discontinued, but started off in this process??

Can the form 10182 be used, or does it HAVE to be the 21-4138 attached at the back of the decision....reason being is because I think we may have royally screwed up, and we filed a 10182

- but my claim is moved to AMA anyways or???

My current appeal is docketed - but.....I'm just scared that the wrong form being used not only is dragging my claim along, but may be struck down for using the wrong form!!!

I'm wanting to go to my VSO tomorrow and correct this...I don't know what to do, and it sounds like my VSO doesn't either...

So I plan on submitting the 21-4138, regardless of the other filing we did originally - even though ramp ended in February - there is still time for those who went RAMP to get in their last minute appeals and such right!?

Edited by awgv001

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice.

You're never out of the fight.

Semper Fidelis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
15 hours ago, pete992 said:

I know this post is a little late but that RAMP program is just a way for VA to deny the veteran's claim and force the veteran to file an appeal. In my own post I have been out of the loop for several years but I guess this is a new way VA can get a claim off their books and into the black hole of appeals which is about 3-5 three to five years or like mine which I have been waiting 21 twenty one years.

While my claim was ultimately denied ( I went DRO route ) - they did have it in and done very quickly so that I could further appeal at the earliest opportunity. Kinda thankful it worked out this way tbh. It wasn't until VERY recent that I was able to retrieve more evidence and support, and strengthen my claim significantly. I understand your frustration to an extent - it's been 12 years since an incident occurred - this injury and symptoms were inaccurately diagnosed as something else, and I have been tasked to go back in time to make corrections and "line up" the correct information. I feel like I'm one of the lucky ones who were able to force my dots to connect - It took nearly 10 years just to get in contact and explain my situation with fellow battles, but it's working!

21 years is an unforgivably long time to wait, so I hope that they hold to their promise of having all legacy claims processed by 2022.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice.

You're never out of the fight.

Semper Fidelis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I to agree, I just hope all legacy claims are completed within the next several years.  I just wish the RO's would complete claims successfully so that we all did not have to go to the BVA or CAVC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
3 hours ago, vetquest said:

I to agree, I just hope all legacy claims are completed within the next several years.  I just wish the RO's would complete claims successfully so that we all did not have to go to the BVA or CAVC.

CAVC is the only way my claim got granted.  I am talking about VARO denied my claim several times BVA remanded my claim and after the VARO denied my claim again then BVA denied my claim and I was forced to get a law dog and CAVC said holy ____ this claim should have been directly service connected. I even lost my CUE.  Now after all these years BVA granted my claim and said my original claim is still open and pending.  Ain't that some Sugar Honey Ice Tea.  Don't you just love 38 CFR 3.156, the one good thing is VARO date stamp evidence and evidence prior to a rating must be adjudicated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use