Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

supplemental claim exam

Rate this question


SPO

Question

I submitted my supplemental claim a couple weeks ago, and I found out today that the VA requested a new C&P exam.  However, according to the VA it is one I am not required to attend.  This confuses and worries me because I disputed the in person exam I received in the original claim.  Its an arthritis claim so you would think they would want a new set of ROM measurements since the last one was more than a year ago and I brought up multiple issues with it.  Anyone have any idea what is going on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Yes. They denied my for no clinical diagnosis.  I submitted record from 2 new rheumatologists, and more records from my doc that signed by original DBQ. My current doc also wrote me a letter pointing out my diagnosis specifically (have to make it idiot proof for some eaters) Along with a lay statement and a statement pointing out all the things the NP who did the first c&p wrong.  I’m hoping my effective dAte will go back to the beginning because the c&p they used to deny me was inadequate and a diagnosis existed the whole time 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Was there evidence of a diagnosis in your files already that they just missed or ignored? They may grant your claim with your new evidence but make the effective date the day of the supplemental claim if you didn’t already have a diagnosis before. BVA would probably give you a better effective date but I hope they do the right thing for you. 
 

In my case they had been denying me since I first filed in 2010 because they kept incorrectly saying that walking and running on 2 bad feet and a bad ankle (all service connected) could not cause knee and back issues. They said my gait was normal even though my exit exam said my gait was abnormal. I think I had 4 C&P exams since 2010 for these same issues. I filed a higher level review for the effective date so we’ll see what happens. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

This was a secondary claim.  I’ve been rated for the primary for 10 years.  There was a dbq from my doc with a diagnosis in the original arthritis claim.  The opted to use my bad c&p to out weigh my docs info. The additional visit notes I submitted from my doc show a diagnosis from before I submitted the original claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

So I spoke to DAV and they said the exams requested for me did not include my hands or hip, which I filed for on the supplemental.  I disputed the first C&P, but the hip and hands I think were somewhat favorable in the first one. I don't know if they are going to use that and get new stuff for everything else.  Any ideas?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The VA definitely keeps you on your toes. My 2018 Exam was a disaster, the examiner was suppose to check feet, knees, hips, back, neck and he checked my back. Ridiculous

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use