Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Headaches: Its Getting Interesting

Rate this question


Fat

Question

In our veteran group, Mark, wants to file a supplemental claim for headaches.

He was originally denied secondary connection to Vertigo around the 2011-2012 time frame.

He had two episodes for headaches due to cold symptoms and one episode of head pain caused by heat while in the Marine Corp.

He went for a C&P Exam in late 2011 and was diagnosed with vascular migranes by the C&P examiner.

He was denied secondary service connection due to no medical relationship between headaches and vertigo.

 

He is consulting with his primary physician for treatment and is wondering if direct service connection is the best way forward.

He will use the military service records, C&P examiners diagnosis, and a current diagnosis as the foundation for direct connection.

The group reiterated make sure the current diagnosis include all sypmtoms, residuals, and problems he is dealing with.

 

Is he on the right track??????

 

All comments are welcomed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Thanks for the comments and all opinions are welcomed.

I think the veteran simply is deciding between the secondary service connection route vs the direct service connection route.

Be cognizant often times diagnosis on active duty are correct, but basic in nature.  The underlying disease, injury, or symptomology is undiscovered until more comprehensive testing is done.

Often times much later in life.

Example: calcium deposits from a broken bone not properly healed, slap tear of rotator cuff which developed into a full tear years later, small disc bulge which develops into a herniated disc or radiculopathy, nose trauma which turns out to be a deviated septum and contributes to sleep apnea, etc

Another example I give is nasal congestion. A correct diagnosis; however more in depth testing indicate sinusitis, enlarged adenoids, deviated septum, etc.

The key in the Caluza standard is a military incident or like incident of injury/sickness.

The like incident opens the door to service connection; however a diagnosis (by verifiable means including residual affects) and nexus statement medically connecting the incidents pushes the claim forward.

I am not a doctor, but a headache is indication of some medical issue and maybe more intensive discovery might uncover why his head hurt at any period in his life.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Direct or Secondary, as stated for Direct you will need the Caluza Standards and as for Secondary you are going to need some type of already service-connected condition with a good medical rationale.  A simple diagnosis will not do, it must connect the condition to something that VA has already granted service-connection. 

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

This Veteran (Mark) will need a nexus statement from a doctor, as already pointed out.  A nexus statement "pre supposes" there is an In service event or aggravation.  If there is no in service event or aggravation, then there cant be a nexus.  

Exception to the above:  Secondary service connection.  "If" Mark has already documented his primary SC, then he need not duplicate that.  The Caluza elements for secondaries consits of 2 elements, not 3:

1.  Current diagnosis. 

2.  Nexus between current diagnosis and primary condition.  

Example:  "If" a doctor says that Mark's Vertigo is "at least as likely as not" causing migraine headaches, you should be good to go.  

If you do not have a nexus, either as primary or secondary, Mark will need one before he gets SC.  This can be done by a VA doctor, or a physician in private practice, such as an IMO/IME.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
16 minutes ago, broncovet said:

This Veteran (Mark) will need a nexus statement from a doctor, as already pointed out.  A nexus statement "pre supposes" there is an In service event or aggravation.  If there is no in service event or aggravation, then there cant be a nexus.  

Exception to the above:  Secondary service connection.  "If" Mark has already documented his primary SC, then he need not duplicate that.  The Caluza elements for secondaries consits of 2 elements, not 3:

1.  Current diagnosis. 

2.  Nexus between current diagnosis and primary condition.  

Example:  "If" a doctor says that Mark's Vertigo is "at least as likely as not" causing migraine headaches, you should be good to go.  

If you do not have a nexus, either as primary or secondary, Mark will need one before he gets SC.  This can be done by a VA doctor, or a physician in private practice, such as an IMO/IME.  

So that its more clear, Is the veterans allready service connected for Vertigo? can you give us a list of what is he is currently SC'd for & %

70% - PTSD

->50% - OSA (Secondary to PTSD)

30% - Bilateral Pes Planus w/Plantar Fasciitis

30% - Migraines

10% - Tinnitus

20% - Back

0% - bilateral shin splints

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use