Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Remand Appeal & New Claims for RFE

Rate this question


renee

Question

I’ve had an appeal on file since 2013 for Fibromyalgia and bilateral knee pain. The appeal went all the way to BVA. During the process they loss my appeal. When the VSO lawyer got involved I started to see traction. As of last week the BVA remanded back to the RO. I read the letter 4 times and it sounds like BVA is scolding the RO for “overlooking” pertinent information like my STRs. The judge gave specific instruction that RO must do assist with connecting my knees to my degenerative bank at 40%. I think I need an IMO and updated DBQ. 
 

But in addition to the above it would appear that the regional office turned around and opened 2 claims for RFE. These are unrelated to my appeal. I definitely feel being like this out of spite. What can I do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Renee I'm not clear; what do you mean the RO "opened 2 claims for RFE"? What is RFE and do you mean these are new claims never initiated by you or are disabilities that you have currently awarded? If "RFE" is anything close to what you have going on with the BVA disabilities, then the VA will have to look at any relationship with any existing disabilities. They have to eval symptoms that may already be accounted for (pyramiding"), worsening of conditions, etc. Need a little more info from you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator
5 hours ago, renee said:

I’ve had an appeal on file since 2013 for Fibromyalgia and bilateral knee pain. The appeal went all the way to BVA. During the process they loss my appeal. When the VSO lawyer got involved I started to see traction. As of last week the BVA remanded back to the RO. I read the letter 4 times and it sounds like BVA is scolding the RO for “overlooking” pertinent information like my STRs. The judge gave specific instruction that RO must do assist with connecting my knees to my degenerative bank at 40%. I think I need an IMO and updated DBQ. 
 

But in addition to the above it would appear that the regional office turned around and opened 2 claims for RFE. These are unrelated to my appeal. I definitely feel being like this out of spite. What can I do.

Renee, try to understand that when a veteran’s claim is remanded from BVA to the local VARO, the local VARO must implement the order and perform a duty to assist the veteran in gathering information and to include in obtaining a current C & P exam and or opinion.  Even though you may have had a positive C & P exam. The local VARO will most likely request a new C & P exam, but it is possible that they could rate your condition but, in my experience, VA will request a new exam and evidence. It is just what they do. Just keep in mind that if you disagree with any decision you can always file a NOD (Notice of Disagreement).

I have a current appeal that I filed and was denied, and I filed a NOD which was ignored. When I reopened my claim it was denied a second time and this time I filed another NOD and the VARO processed it and it has been to the BVA then remanded back to the VARO then back to the BVA then remanded back to the VARO and then to the CAVC and remanded back to the BVA for a final grant and then remanded back to the VARO only to have the VARO low ball my rating and my claim is going back to the BVA. Yeah, no sh_t. BVA granted my effective date but the VARO screwed up my rating percentage and refuse to grant.  Of course, this is after the VARO granted my corrected rating then decrease/reduced it  while still in the appeal status. Well the VARO did correct and gave me my higher rating but not my percentage effective date. You must be determined not to give up.

Also keep in mind that this is your fight, your battle and some will not understand. I feel that since this evidence was always in my file and the VARO missed/ignored it or for whatever reason it is/was money that I should have been awarded/granted and I feel that I should get it.

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

GB Army

RFE   ABBREVIATION    RFE , Routine Future Exam.

renee 

Call the washington hot-line  and tell them what you just mention here 

here is the #White House VA Hotline:  1-855-948-2311. 

 

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

You have 2 questions, I will answer each seperately:

1.  You posted:  

Quote

The judge gave specific instruction that RO must do assist with connecting my knees to my degenerative bank at 40%. I think I need an IMO and updated DBQ. 

 You read the decision, I have not read it as you did not post it.  I have "only your interpretation" of the decision and my advice can not be any better than your interpretation.  Best is if you post the decision, redact your name and then I can interpret it, or others on hadit. 

     We dont know if you need an IMO or not, and its unclear if this is a claim for increase or intitial SC.  If you are appealing a disability

percentage on an already sc condition, then you well "may" need an

IMO to document your symptoms (and an effective date those

symptoms occurred).  If this is for a new SC, well usually BVA grants (or denies) SC and leaves the percent up to the VARO.  You mentioned 40 percent, so this suggests its already sc, but its unclear if you are referring to "other" issues not yet SC.    If you are seeking Service connection, then make sure you have the Caluza elements, and, if you are missing or have an inadequate nexus, you will likely need an IMO for that.  

2.  Moving on to your next question you asked:

Quote

it would appear that the regional office turned around and opened 2 claims for RFE.

   Who told you this?  Was it your VSO?   Did the VA send you a letter that you will be "scheduled" for a C and p Rexam? (RFE?)   If not, It sounds like you looked on ebenefits and saw some sort of RFE on 2 unlelated issues.  An "RFE" isnt a claim.  When you are granted SC, the VA also makes a determination if you are p and t, or if "future exams are scheduled".  It also sounds like you are basing this on the myth, that, when YOu apply for an increase, VA will reduce you instead.  This is not the case.  

      Ebenefits is historically both unreliable and out of date.  If this is based on your interpretation of ebenefits, I say dont worry about it.  If I worried every time ebenefits wrote a new line in my file, I would spend the rest of my life worrying, and that would be a waste.  If they have requested a re exam, that is something different and we can address that. 

       Dont worry about ebenefits, and make sure of your source.  VSO's are sometimes less reliable than ebenefits (if that is possible).   

        My advice is to find out the answers to my questions, and, if it is as I think, just wait.  If you have money for an IMO, it may well be productive.  

         You used the term "VSO lawyer".  Hmm..was it a lawyer, or a VSO, or, did your VSO hire you a lawyer? (it happens sometimes).  If you do have a lawyer, you probably should ask him these questions, as he has read your file and knows more about your case than we do.  

       I almost never go against a Vets lawyer, when he has read your file and I have not.  

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks for responding.  I’ll provide some clarification because my original post was full of emotion....

 

1.  I’ve also attached the remand for easy reference.


2.  The appeal remanded by the BVA was for fibromyalgia and knee arthritis claimed as pain. The original file was for service connection. The BVA judge in his remanded stated that the RO failed to assist in developing my claimed issues as being connected to (I.e. causation or aggravated by) my already service connected degenerative back disability. The judge in my interpretation is throwing the red flag on the RO for their failure to assist. After call with the VSO’s lawyer I guess I have a bit more clarity although she didn’t hesitate to admonish my questioning of VA’s policies and procedures. As it stands today, additional evidence was procured from my health file by the VA. They did not include everything back to 2013 and they should correct?

3. The two new claims they opened are apparently future examinations. I had a  PTSD, MDD and MST re-exam last year and they’re doing it again. The other is for my migraines which are rated at 50% now. I got bumped in 2017 that took me to 100%. Before then my migraines were static, when they bumped me it removed the static. 
 

It could be timing but right now I feel like they’re attacking me. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

517B7627-5F76-4FB9-8CE4-4259BD5DD09A.jpeg

DAF5066C-E9F4-4B92-B8A5-E7A88E3701AF.jpeg

29609737-0A14-4CBE-9862-347C5C7AA0E4.jpeg

BEDCDD8D-ADE3-4451-931E-377D1510743E.jpeg

DFF8DF2E-6A83-4AB4-91C6-E8E86041DDC1.jpeg

0C04385F-4E33-460B-86E3-D74871192FD4.jpeg

0F570B57-FDCF-4393-8225-5C479C69A8E8.jpeg

9291FC0B-87C2-48EB-9BC7-59D3A2B931D7.jpeg

Edited by renee
Redacted
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

renee,

I advise to get an attorney at this point, looks like they remanded all your claims.

 check out this link , it has some insight as how the remans work and some great information to use.

https://www.veteranslawblog.org/expedite-va-remand-process/

Source: Attorney Chris Attig  VLB  (Veterans Law Blog)

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • LEArmy93P earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • LtDave earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • HillTopVet earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva went up a rank
      Contributor
    • AFguy1999 went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use