Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

On-Line SMC-l claim question

Rate this question


8th&IMarine

Question

I filed my 21-2680 aid/attendance form filled out by my PCP at the VA.I also submitted parts of my VA records that I thought would apply to my claim for aid/attendance. I just noticed that under  "What You've Claimed" on-line it says the following:

What you’ve claimed
  • SMC - L Aid and Attendance (New)
  • degenerative arthritis
  • left hip (Increase)
  • lumbar spine degenerative disease (Increase)
  • plantar fasciitis
  • right foot (Increase)
  • right lower extremity radiculopathy (claimed as neuritis or radiculopathy bilateral legs/toes) (Increase)

All I claimed is the SMC. It is listing most of my s/c disabilities and looks like I am filing for increases. All of those are already adjudicated nd I am at 100% schedular/permaent and have been for a few years.  Are they trying to redo all my settled disabilities because I am claiming aid and attendance??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Ok I am never saying don't report for a exam.

Am I saying make a issue about the exams. If it is try to reduce you yes

IMG_20210731_195010132.jpg.adf5188a98553

 

Now as you can see the judge understood I wasn't going to anymore exams.

So he had to put the medical opinion stuff.

Well needless to say because I would go to there exam and no place would do a exam with out me  they just choose to never give me a decision on it. Lol  I did even get the denail

Now I am 25 year protected tdiu.

Yes I press the envelope and yes I have about 5 request to lower my rating in my record since I apply for smc benfits. This is fact

So all that they not trying to do this or that.

I don't go for

Look at the remand 

The judge all but told them my condition got better.

Last part this is a cavc remand.

And as u can't see the judge volating both these cases.

I all start with the law.



Adam v. Principi, 256 F.3d 1318 (Fed. Cir. 2001), (in which the court stated that it would be improper for the Veterans Court to remand a case to the Board to give the DVA another opportunity to develop evidence needed to satisfy an evidentiary burden it had failed to satisfy the first time, i.e., to “attempt to introduce new evidence sufficient to make up the shortfall” in the agency’s proof. Id. At 1322.”

Someiano v. Principi, 17 Vet.App. 305, 312 (2003) (Court noted that it would not be permissible for VA to undertake further development if purpose was to obtain evidence against appellant’s case.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
3 hours ago, asknod said:

If 8th & IMarine is actually 100% schedular and p&t (and not TDIU w/ SMC S), he has no worries about reductions. If he's 20-year protected for each of the items requested, c&p exams would be superfluous

Strong point. Idea: wait until this whole thing is over, then document the C&P's and file a complaint with the VAOIG based on the 2018 IG report on wasted tax dollars. May not end the confusion caused when VA tells you that you requested increased in all your ratings (which you did not do in an A&A claim), because the confusion comes directly from a lie. Sometimes you have to bite the bullet first to get the results.


Either way you go, the VA should never present these C&P exams as something the Vet requested when in fact the Vet never did. Without specific cause backed by regulation/CFR and/or US Code, they should not go fishing like this without proper notification.  The term "reasons and basis" come to mind here, because the VA is not required to have any for this type of activity (which already resulted in millions of wasted tax dollars from unnecessary C&P examinations, as indicated by the IG already).

Edited by pwrslm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Ok why would a veteran waiting until they do everything and all these exams.

For issues not granted a year ago.

He did not apply for an increase rating.

So now the board and va are just ordering exams to increase veterans claims or to see if veterans are eligible for smc.

Yea ok.

I just got a remand Because the judge said a video appointment at the va hospital march 2021 I stated I feel good today.

So my condition has to be look at.

Smh I apply for smc benfits 2018 it's a cavc remand back to the board.

But they stated a exam need to be done again. Because of the 2021 hospital note.

I am 25 year protected I refuse the exam.

And I have been on a 5 month shopping spree for a comp exam 

The va has send it to all three place and the va hospital. No one want to do the ace medical opinion.

I just got the ssoc this month for the denial.

Now they will not return it back to the board.

I keep getting letters from va stating you refused a comp exam we will give you 30days to respond.

I have respond. Smh.

Once again I am not telling a veteran who does have 25 year protection to refuse a exam.

I am point out that the va will do anything to put a unfavorable medical opinion in your record now.

Not going to point out the law again against this to a cavc remand.

To the veteran good luck.

And I would at least put a statement in my record about the exams and staying I feel they are not need.

And then report to them.

You will not get a copy of the exam before the va process them.

A statement after means nothing.

I give you a example.

The va gave me 3 different decision on my claim. 2018

On the nod I wrote I appeal all decision made on the claims dated.

I understood the set up there was no need for 3 different decision.

They hope I would miss something and not appeal.

Well in appeal The board stated I didn't appeal one of the decision.

There for I can't get a bva decision

It got to the court the court remand it because I wrote all decisions on the nod.

Be proactive. Is my advice to all veterans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Update:

I informed VES that I would not be attending the exams due to inconvenience and lack of necessity. I also attached to my VA file a withdrawal request for all of the additional increase claims that I did not file for in the first place. The withdrawals showed up on my VA.gov today so now I'm hoping for a quick decision on the SMC-L claim as a stand alone request based on the 21-2680 and the other evidence I originally submitted.  Fingers crossed!

 

  • SMC - L Aid and Attendance (New)
  • degenerative arthritis
  • left hip-withdrawn 12/10/2021 (Increase)
  • lumbar spine degenerative disease-withdrawn 12/10/2021 (Increase)
  • plantar fasciitis
  • right foot-withdrawn 12/10/2021 (Increase)
  • right lower extremity radiculopathy (claimed as neuritis or radiculopathy bilateral legs/toes)-withdrawn 12/10/2021 (Increase)
  • Left lower extremity radiculopathy (also claimed as neuritis bilateral leg/toes) (previously rated as DC 8526 left lower extremity radiculopathy)-withdrawn 12/10/2021 (Increase)
  • degenerative joint disease right hip-withdrawn 12/10/2021 (Increase)
  • left lower radiculopathy (femoral)-withdrawn 12/10/2021 (Increase)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Update: All the claims for "increase" that the VA added were rightfully withdrawn. I since got a denial on the claim for SMC-L aid/attendance based on not having a "singular 100% disability" though they admitted that I require aid/attendance due to my S/C disabilities. My argument was like the Skeleton Dance song -The knee bone connected to the thigh bone, The thigh bone connected to the back bone. In other words all my disabilities are secondary to one primary claim- my hip. I requested a DRO review and received a phone call interview within a few days!!! Now I wait for the DRO decision. Fingers crossed again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use