Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Already 100% Tdiu With New 60% Increase Added....

Rate this question


ammawa

Question

Hi all, I got a question: I'm already 100 TDIU, I just got an decision from the Board in DC giving me and increase in my back SC disability from 40% to 60% and the effective date is March 18, 1993.

My question is will the back pay and the fact that I'm drawing 100% anyway... offset in anyway... This is the first time I have actually gotten an increase since being awarded 100% in 2005

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

ammawa,

A couple of questions would help me answer yours and maybe expand a little about potential entitlements.

1. When did you become schedularly eligible to receive IU? Was there an increase in compensation that made you initially eligible for the first time in 2005?

2. Were you still working on March 1993? If so, what date did you stop working?

There are a lot of factors here, but you may be entitled to an earlier effective date on your individual unemployability benefit based on your new decision. The primary factors are when you first became schedularly entitled to apply for the benefit, when you stopped working, whether or not VA properly notified you about potential entitlement to unemployability benefits when you became schedularly eligible for the benefit, and lastly...whether or not you filed for consideration of the benefit within one year of when you initially became schedularly eligible for the benefit.

As far as the retroactive benefits you'll receive as a result of the recent decision, you will receive the difference of the service-connected compensation rates from March 1993 until your unemployability benefits were established in 2005. If you have no other service-connected disabilities, you would receive the difference between 40% and 60% for the specified time period. Obviously, this would change if there were other service-connected disabilities which would influence your combined evaluation.

There may be historical rate charts online somewhere that you could use to come up with an estimate of what retroactive benefit you will receive.

Hope this helps :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now I am 80% being paid 100% TDIU. I first put my claim in for Unemployability in Aug 1993 that's when I stopped working. and went to VA Vocal Rehab for 4 years.

Right now I'm 50% for mood disorder, 40% for Back strain, 10% for incomplete paralasisl left leg and 10% for incomplete paralasis right leg and 10% for right knee.

The current decision will take my back SC disability to 60%.

Back in 1993, i asked for and incress for my back.... I also put my claim in fro IU in aug. of 93.

Back them you had to have atleast one disability rated at 6o% to be considered for IU. Now that I've been awarded 60% all the way back to 93 my claim is still inline for IU in 1993

Hope this makes since...But I figured they would pay retro back until my date of IU which is Jan.

2005 That's still 12 years Does anyone know what that new increase will do to my 80% of course I'm being paid at 100%.

ammawa,

A couple of questions would help me answer yours and maybe expand a little about potential entitlements.

1. When did you become schedularly eligible to receive IU? Was there an increase in compensation that made you initially eligible for the first time in 2005?

2. Were you still working on March 1993? If so, what date did you stop working?

There are a lot of factors here, but you may be entitled to an earlier effective date on your individual unemployability benefit based on your new decision. The primary factors are when you first became schedularly entitled to apply for the benefit, when you stopped working, whether or not VA properly notified you about potential entitlement to unemployability benefits when you became schedularly eligible for the benefit, and lastly...whether or not you filed for consideration of the benefit within one year of when you initially became schedularly eligible for the benefit.

As far as the retroactive benefits you'll receive as a result of the recent decision, you will receive the difference of the service-connected compensation rates from March 1993 until your unemployability benefits were established in 2005. If you have no other service-connected disabilities, you would receive the difference between 40% and 60% for the specified time period. Obviously, this would change if there were other service-connected disabilities which would influence your combined evaluation.

There may be historical rate charts online somewhere that you could use to come up with an estimate of what retroactive benefit you will receive.

Hope this helps :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you were denied in August of 1993 and the benefit was denied. What was the basis of the denial? Was this issue also continued under appeal?

If the basis of the denial was that you were not schedulary eligible for the benefit because your disability was not rated high enough...you certainly would have a case for earlier effective date. Obviously we can't say this definitively without having a chance to look at the evidence in your file...but the only hiccup that I can think of off the top of my head would be what disability your IU was based upon. If the mental disorder played a significant role in this grant, it could possibly influence their ability to go all the way back.

Using the percentages you have provided and with the bilateral factor included, it looks to me like you're current combined total would be 84 and your evaluation would round down to remain at 80%. This was completed free hand...so someone with access to a disability calculator should verify 60+50=80 and 80+21= 84...I believe that is correct but you can verify it if you like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 2 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use