Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Mr. T

Rate this question


Stayfocus

Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
7 minutes ago, pacmanx1 said:

New Military Records

Under 38 C.F.R. 3.156(c), a veteran can receive an earlier effective date if VA denied their original claim for service connection, and then later obtained service records in a subsequent claim that substantiated the veteran’s original claim.

VA outlines specific types of service records that would qualify under the regulation.  These records can include:

  • Service records that are related to a claimed in-service event, injury, or disease, regardless of whether such records mention the veteran by name, as long as the other requirements are met
  • Additional service records forwarded by the Department of Defense or the service department to VA any time after VA’s original request for service records
  • Declassified records that could not have been obtained because the records were classified when VA decided the claim

New and Relevant Evidence Submitted Within an Appeal Period for an Earlier Effective Date

Under 3.156(b)if a veteran submits new and relevant evidence within the appeal period of a decision from the Regional Office (RO), and VA does not provide notice or a determination as to whether that evidence is new and material, the veteran may be able to argue that their claim is still open with VA.

If the claim was denied previously, but then granted on records that have recently been discovered, the regulation requires that VA consider an effective date back to the time of the previously denied claim.

The VARO loves to ignore their own regulations.

Getting an Earlier Effective Date for VA Disability Claims | CCK Law (cck-law.com)

Where is the accountability? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator
8 minutes ago, Gilbert P Torres Jr said:

Where is the accountability? 

There is none at the VARO they get away with a lot and it should not be this way.

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

exactly why i am at the BVA for EED....found service records proving my osa was dx in service...now just waiting on judgement...supposed to go back to 2008 denial...right now all i have is OSA SC from 2019... 

Edited by blahsaysme2u
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

It funny how the bva or VA doesn't address this.

I just had my case remand by the cavc back to the bva because of this.

I used service records to reopen a claim 2018 mental health. Granted 70%

I get my record find out the original mental health claim from 2003 remaining pending.

The VA lawyer at the court tried to say there was no reason for them to address my effective date for this issue. Lol.

So basically they don't want to address that the appeal pending from 2003 became final 2018 when it was granted the 70%. 2003 effective date 

The don't want to say the appeal was closed from 2003.

Because than they will have to say it was reopen with my service records from 1993.  1993 effective date.

So now I am back at the bva again to see what game it what they come up with to prolong the process.

My bad for the long posted.

It seem very hard to get the bva or VA to address effective dates these days.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
7 hours ago, blahsaysme2u said:

exactly why i am at the BVA for EED....found service records proving my osa was dx in service...now just waiting on judgement...supposed to go back to 2008 denial...right now all i have is OSA SC from 2019... 

What lane are you in, and when was your appeal put on the docket?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

i am still not sure of the lane i am in...i never did call to find out..

but this claim started in 2008...was re-opened in:

2013-  denied

2019- denied...appealed with new service records and won at BVA; effective date of 2019 given

2020-appealed-denied; NOD to BVA again; 

2022- hearing with judge;

 

here we are just sitting waiting on judge to determine my service records are service records and constitute EED...and hopefully the VARO awards it correctly so i am off this hamster wheel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use