Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

BVA granted my appeal now...

Rate this question


Remisdad

Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

@Remisdad Would you be willing to answer a few questions involving your BVA appeal? This information would be helpful to myself and others who are stuck in limbo waiting on the BVA to make a decision.

1. When was your appeal submitted to the BVA?

2. Was it a legacy appeal or an AMA appeal?

3. If you opted for a hearing, how long did it take to get it?

 

By the way, congratulations on your win!

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

My appeal was a legacy.  NOD was filed in late 2016.  Form 9 was filed September 2019.  BVA remanded my appeal to the director of compensation in Feb 2020 which was granted. May 26 2023 (I think) it went to a judge is reviewing your appeal or something close to that wording.  June 29 BVA granted my appeal.  No hearing.  I started out at 10% on left long finger, then in April of 2018 I got 10% for tinnitus, remand in Feb 2020 bumped my left long finger to 20% and left ring finger to 10%, in Feb 2021 I got 60% for loss of use of non dominant hand (left hand), in December 2022 I got 30% radiculopathy in my right arm and 20% radiculopathy in my left hand, and 20% for a cervical disc replacement.  The two arms and loss of use of hand are all bilateral.  In February 2023 I was granted IU. And that's how I got to this point. Its been a long journey to go from 10% to IU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

When I first applied, a Vet told me he had been appealing for 5 years.  I thought he was pulling my leg.  "How could it possibly take 5 years to process a Veterans claim?"  

Now, I do have an answer to that:  "They hurried your claim up".  

Yea, that sounds crazy.  5 years.  But many Vets claims take 6, 8, or 10 years or more.  But mine did not take ten years.  

I applied in 2002, finally got a check in 2020 over 17 years later.  (I got some 'LOW BALL" MONEY EARLIER, but had to appeal..BVA, CAVC, multiple times. ). 

Its a difference in perspective.  I say my "claim" took 17 years, but one va employee differs, saying my first decision was in 2003.  And it was..a denial.    I was denied "even tho" I obviously had all 3 Caluza elements.  

In 2005, the BVA awarded SC.  So, the regional office said, "Ok.  Service connection 0 percent".  Dont spend all your money in one place.  $0.00.  I had to appeal that.  Finally got 40 percent, but not soon enough to save my home from foreclosure.  That 40 percent was around $400 a month, and I was supposed to support a family on that.  

Finally, in 2006, my doctor suggested applying for "pension".  I got it, but not retro to 2002.  Then I had to give up my pension because I married a nurse who made too much money to qualify for pension.  

Loosing my home and becoming homeless gave me the resolve:  Im gonna keep going until I get paid what I deserve no matter how long it takes.  VA could/should have granted pension in 2002, and I would not have lost my home.  They "created" a homeless Veteran, with inefficiency, and just plain not caring about Veterans.  Well, Im not homeless anymore.  

Yesterday, I bought a new Toyota Crown, the best and most expensive car Toyota has ever made.  Its amazing.  And, when you go to the VAMC, you often find new cars and trucks parked there...by Vets who were persistent enough to fight VA until they won.  

You can likely do that also..the key is persistence.  Quitting rarely ever works.  However, some Vets quit and turn it over to an attorney, and that works also.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I agree never give up.  I even went to talk to a DAV representative and she just flat out said she wouldn't file for IU because there was no way for me to get it.  I got extremely irritated but calmly asked for my paperwork back and stomped out of her office.  So once again don't ever quit fighting even though it seems like the VA is trying to make you quit or they're waiting for you to die.

Edited by Remisdad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Many VSOs are prejudice against certain veterans according to the vets age, war era, race, looks, etc.

Here is a prime example.  In 1985 an older Korean War DAV VSO sold me down the river on my first initial PTSD disability claim.  He totally ignored the VA and private treatment records and diagnosis revealing I suffered from severe Vietnam Combat PTSD and simply filed a one paragraph letter with the application form stating briefly that I suffered only from anxiety and alcholism.

VA doctors and C&P examiner did diagnosis me with PTSD on axis 4  but placed Alcholism on Axis 1.    I was lucky VA raters gave me only a low ball 50% rating that I wanted to appeal but the old biased fart said no use to do so.

He made it plain to me in at least two face to face meetings he did not care for us young loser Vietnam vets.  The old goat is dead by now I am happy to say. Other  Va  doctors and family doctor made clear in their notes that PTSD was my primary medical problem.  He submitted none of this with my claim.

Ever since 85 I have successfully filed on my own my many claims and appeals to the BVA and U.S. CAVC veterans court.

Too many VSOs are lazy prejudicial suck asses in my opinion.

combinededitedcroppedperkins507thDustoffmedevacUH-1Hrescuehoist.jpg.7c3053794369e014e2ea83de19f3fbaf.jpg

Edited by Dustoff1970
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

@broncovet That is definitely true. If the VA had not rushed in many of my claims, they would have been half as thorough as I was and found the obvious evidence to grant SC.

@Remisdad My current VSO rep advised me to stop filing claims. About 10 years ago, a different VSO rep from the same organization told me if all vets were as thorough as I was, he would be out of a job....

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use