Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Denied, Restless Leg Syndrome DBQ's as Peripheral Neuropathy, HLR Toxic Exposure

Rate this question


IndySam

Question

Posted (edited)

HiYa!

 

I was denied Restless Leg Syndrome, from toxic exposure. I have RLS since around 2009, out of service 2006. I wasn't sure what would happen with it. 

 

I now have my DBQ from the C&P examiner, they used the Peripheral Neuropathy dbq. Which basically is all answered Nos on the form cause I don't have that!  I even filed it as Convulsice Ticks (RLS). There is no DBQ for RLS, or code.

 

So my question is when I do the HLR call with the reviewer I can mention maybe a better dbq to use would be CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM AND NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASES, RLS is more like Parkinsons than what the first C&P doctor did?

 

Thanks!!

Edited by IndySam
clarify
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 1
  • Moderator

What were the reasons and bases for denial?  This is important. 

However, It sounds like you have the cart ahead of the horse.  To get service connection, You need the Caluza elements of current diagnosis of RLS, in service event which you apparently allege is toxic exposure.  and a nexus, or doctors opinion that your RLS is at least as likely as not due to your toxic exposure in service.  You need to check for documentation of those 3 items:  Documentation of toxic exposure, your diagnosis, and the nexus letter.  Did the doc essentially state that your toxic military exposure was at least as likely as not the cause of your RLS?  

Short cut:  (Maybe).  "IF" RLS is on the presumptive list, then check that one out.  IDK your country of service, or time of service, so I have no idea what, if any, toxic exposure would be presumptive.  Is this a pact act claim?

Lastly, of course, there is a possibility that your RLS is related to one or more already service connected conditions, that is, secondary.  

You always need to consider the Caluza elements first, before symptoms.  Only after you have been service connected, with either presumptive, CAluza, or secondary Service connection, will the symptoms matter.  

I see you are at 90 percent.  Are you working?  A short cut may be to seek TDIU, its very hard to get from 90 percent to 100 percent.  Because of VA math, you have to have an additional 50 percent to go from 90% to 100 percent, not 10 percent more as your grade school teacher taught you that 90 percent plus 10 percent equals 100 percent.   Not with VA math.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1
  • Moderator

Im glad you are able to continue working with your disabilities.   While I have heard this type of thing in the past, I would NEVER go through all the trouble to get something service connected "unless" there was a real potential benefit to my self or to my family.  That is, "if" service connection for RLS would not/could not result in some type of increase compensation, I would not bother with it.  

Sometimes, of course, applying for additional benefits can benefit your family but not result in any increase in pay.  As an example, lets say you have a heart issue, not service connected, but are already 100 percent plus SMC S, so applying for and being granted an added rating for IHD would unlikely increase your compensaiton.  However, a heart issue could easily result in your death and your spouse would be eligible for DIC if you die of a service connected condion OR if you die from any cause AFTER you have been 100 percent P and T for 10 years.  So, it could well help your spouse in the event of your death to be SC for IHD.  

It seems unlikely that RLS is likely to cause death, however.  

You need to decide "if its worth it" to continue (appealing) a claim for RLS or not.  I cant decide that, you obviously know way more about your health conditions and finances than I ever will.  But I do know that most of the time, getting benefits involves lengthy appeals, and a fight for your benefits, freankly.    For me, I would not "fight VA" for an "acknowledgement", instead, unless there was a reasonable chance of increased compensation, I would not go through it.  

I personally have other disabilities that I could persue.  For example, I fractured my leg in service, and have some serious arthritis of the knee.  But, "arthritis of the knee(s)" or related potential disability conditions are extremely unlikely to result in any additional compensation, so I am not persuing them.  (Because Im already 100 percent P and T plus SMC S). 

For me, I would rather the VA spend time working on other Veterans claims, than working on my arthritis service connection as it means no additional comp to me or my family even if awarded.  That is what I call "busy work".  

My father mentioned in the 30's there was a goverment program called the WPA.  They hired people and often gave them busy work.  

"Ok, dig o hole 5 feet by 3 feet, by six feet."  

(You dig the hole).  "Now, fill it back in again, and do that over and over again".  

Im not against "exercise", but I dont want to do busy work to accomplish nothing.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, broncovet said:

What were the reasons and bases for denial?  This is important. 

However, It sounds like you have the cart ahead of the horse.  To get service connection, You need the Caluza elements of current diagnosis of RLS, in service event which you apparently allege is toxic exposure.  and a nexus, or doctors opinion that your RLS is at least as likely as not due to your toxic exposure in service.  You need to check for documentation of those 3 items:  Documentation of toxic exposure, your diagnosis, and the nexus letter.  Did the doc essentially state that your toxic military exposure was at least as likely as not the cause of your RLS?  

Short cut:  (Maybe).  "IF" RLS is on the presumptive list, then check that one out.  IDK your country of service, or time of service, so I have no idea what, if any, toxic exposure would be presumptive.  Is this a pact act claim?

Lastly, of course, there is a possibility that your RLS is related to one or more already service connected conditions, that is, secondary.  

You always need to consider the Caluza elements first, before symptoms.  Only after you have been service connected, with either presumptive, CAluza, or secondary Service connection, will the symptoms matter.  

I see you are at 90 percent.  Are you working?  A short cut may be to seek TDIU, its very hard to get from 90 percent to 100 percent.  Because of VA math, you have to have an additional 50 percent to go from 90% to 100 percent, not 10 percent more as your grade school teacher taught you that 90 percent plus 10 percent equals 100 percent.   Not with VA math.  

Yeah, I was in Iraq, thanks for the reply! I guess I thought it would be since he was verbally telling me in the C&P that it was toxic either to mechanic MOS or burn pits.

 

But from what I have, the completed DBQ, none of that conversation is documented in my file. So not sure now I guess.

 

RLS is not presumtive. I will go back and look at some successful RLS cases,

 

I am 80%, and work. I am not super concerned with getting 100%, more feel like I would like it acknowledged.

Edited by IndySam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Also funny story, my RLS Neuro Doctor is my wife's boss. Then for the C&P exam, I got my Neuro doctor's dad, a heart doctor for the RLS C&P.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
On 5/8/2024 at 5:35 AM, IndySam said:

HiYa!

 

I was denied Restless Leg Syndrome, from toxic exposure. I have RLS since around 2009, out of service 2006. I wasn't sure what would happen with it. 

 

I now have my DBQ from the C&P examiner, they used the Peripheral Neuropathy dbq. Which basically is all answered Nos on the form cause I don't have that!  I even filed it as Convulsice Ticks (RLS). There is no DBQ for RLS, or code.

 

So my question is when I do the HLR call with the reviewer I can mention maybe a better dbq to use would be CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM AND NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASES, RLS is more like Parkinsons than what the first C&P doctor did?

 

Thanks!!

Have you ever had an EEG or an EMG?  Seen a neurologist?  What medications are you taking?

2 hours ago, IndySam said:

Also funny story, my RLS Neuro Doctor is my wife's boss. Then for the C&P exam, I got my Neuro doctor's dad, a heart doctor for the RLS C&P.  

So you have seen a neurologist. 

You were in the Marines.  Ask your father-in-law to check you for TBI residuals and epilepsy.  There are numerous causes of RLS.  Need to narrow the cause and not guess that is toxic exposure until that is the last choice.  Might help to put in a claim for seizures.  RLS will be easily observable with an in home telemetry that is set up by a VA contractor.  Your father-in-law can order the telemetry.

Are you always conscious of the leg movements or just waken up by them after they start?  Do you initiate them or are they uncontrolled?  What responses did you make on the DBQ?

Your history for that will include any head injuries or exposure to blasts including outgoing artillery without full head protection.  Might have to go to your military assignment page for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use