Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

VA antics

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

Greetings, Hadit family

   As I’m currently waiting at the BVA for my appeals, I was reading over one of my denials. The VA put down something I was never appealing, which was IU effective date. I never was challenging that, I was challenging my rating effective date, that made me IU. I was determined to be IU from my PTSD alone, so I was challenging my effective date on my PTSD and not IU.

   It’s like they changed the narrative on this appeal which fits their story for a denial. They’re correct in the denial of the IU effective date because of my rating for PTSD. I clearly put down on the form what I was challenging and still have it uploaded to my file, which states PTSD effective date wrong and the year it should be. I have the evidence in my file to show that my 70 percent PTSD rating should have been a few more years prior from the date they have now, which in turn will change my IU effective date.

  Is this something worth bringing to my attorney attention or just have the BVA do their due diligence and catch this error? Is this even a big deal? Thanks for your time and any insights are well appreciated.

  

 

 

Edited by Bluntly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Lead Moderator

IDK why this post was at the very bottom, when its a recent post, much newer than many of those ahead of it.  

So, I missed it.  

Yes, I would not leave this stone unturned, because it could mean the difference between lots and lots of retro.  

Its a rather complicated issue, because, a "claim for tdiu" is a claim for increase, so IDK if your effective date for PTSD would change the effective date for tdiu, but I cant see a good reason to risk how the BVA would interpret this question.  Instead, I would send a 21-4138 to "clarify the issues"  that you are appealing both the effective date for PTSD as well as the tdiu effective date, since this could go either way.  If it were me, I would send the form to Janesville.  I doubt the attorney would get mad because you did this without consulting him/her, but he may change his or her tune when the result comes around.  You could also mention this to the attorney, but I would take the pro active route and just send the clarification evidence in.  

For me, I would explain (briefly) that this clarification was necessary because YOU are unclear as to the legal ramifications of the issue of PTSD/vs TDIU in regard to effective dates, thus the clarification that your appeal encompass both issues.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@broncovet Thanks as always for your reply and feedback. I had a talk with my attorney and he mentioned that since it’s an increase then my IU is in play. So I’ll just have to wait to see how this plays as I do have faith in them. Increase and effective date issues in play, but because I asked for an increase and that increase is connected to my IU, then I guess I can understand why they brought this IU up. Thanks for reading and will post back whenever this is over with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator
Posted (edited)
On 6/26/2024 at 9:24 AM, Bluntly said:

I was determined to be IU from my PTSD alone, so I was challenging my effective date on my PTSD and not IU

Actually, I think, and I may be wrong or off but since you filed a claim for increase for your PTSD which would lead to a TDIU rating then both scenarios are on the table and depending on if the VA grants you TDIU solely for PTSD, if you have additional disability or disabilities that are rated at or combined to 60%  separate and distinct from your PTSD then SMC-S would also be on the table. 

Edited by pacmanx1

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@pacmanx1 thanks for your reply. I’m already TDIU because of my ptsd alone which is at 70 percent. All I was asking for was an increase on my ptsd and an effective date issue regarding the ptsd. The Va came back with “Entitlement to individual unemployability effective November 11, 2016, is continued”, which confused me because I never put that down on the form. As far as SMC, yes you’re correct that is in play also. That’s on a separate appeal also at the BVA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You should check out secondary conditions for PTSD.  If you have evidence of a connection between many conditions and PTSD you can get there.  I knew a guy who got a heart condition connected to PTSD.   In your situation now you want to try and get "S" and any other SMC you can get.  I was TDIU and I got "S" due to extra 60% I got for a heart condition due to agent orange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use