Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C &p Exams Results

Rate this question


larry1961

Question

file a claim secondary to epilepsy. had a c&p on jan.11,07, got copy of exam.

AXIS: I major depression disorder, single episode, severe with psychotic features, in partial remmission. ptsd chronic delayed(non combat related training injury)

AXIS: III complex partial epilepsy, djd, right ankle injury due to seizures, history of kidney disease.

AXIS: IV death of family members, including death of mother, unemployment, epilepsy.

AXIS: V GAF=50

doctor's opinion: veteran's serious depression is most likely cause by his service connected epilepsy psychmotor type (complex partial epilepsy).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Larry1961,

Without being able to read the whole exam and the rational the examiner used to make this opinion, it seems like the exam would be enough to award service-connection for MDD as secondary to the epilepsy.

One thing to keep in mind there is a provision within the rating schedule regarding mental disorders and seizures under §4.124a, it states;

"Mental Disorders in Epilepsies: A nonpsychotic organic brain syndrome will be rated separately under the appropriate diagnostic code (e.g., 9304 or 9326). In the absence of a diagnosis of non-psychotic organic psychiatric disturbance (psychotic, psychoneurotic or personality disorder) if diagnosed and shown to be secondary to or directly associated with epilepsy will be rated separately. The psychotic or psychoneurotic disorder will be rated under the appropriate diagnostic code. The personality disorder will be rated as a dementia (e.g., diagnostic code 9304 or 9326)"

I hope this helps!

Vike 17

Edited by Vike17
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Larry,

Why was this C&P scheduled? What was the claim for. I see several issues that are confusing. He calls the major depressive disorder a single episode. You might need a diagnosis of chronic depression for service connection and this doctor knows this and wrote the exam in a way to weaken a claim. Partial remission? What does this mean. In one way it leaves the door open for the establishment of a chronic condition because the so called single event has not totally resolved. It might require continued treatment and evaluation to establish the chronic depression.

If you are not in treatment, I would suggest that you go to a VAMC and ask for continued treatment and evaluation to establish chronic depression due to SC epilepsy to strengethen the claim. You can always file the claim tomorrow and get into treatment and submit evidence later. You can usually get better and stronger evaluations from a treating physician who spends a significant amout of time working with you than from a C&P examiner who bases an opinion on one exam.

Also, has the non combat PTSD stressor been established. If the stressor is not accepted then they might say you have both chronic PTSD of unknown origin and a single episode of depression due to SC epilepsy. That might be hard to SC.

I think the claim would be much stronger if they called the depression due to SC epilepsy chronic. Also, if the PTSD stressor is not established they will probably need to schedule another C&P to determine if any part of the GAF associated with the service connected psych condition can be established. That is of course they determine the SC depression due to epilepsy is chronic.

These are my concerns and questions about this C&P. I could be misinterpreting this. However. I have seen other C&P doctors who are experts at writing reports that the veteran thinks sounds good but all they do in the long run is "BLOW SMOKE".

Edited by Hoppy

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Well, I can see that I need to change my screen name.

Tbird, how do I go about doing that?

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Larry1961,

Without being able to read the whole exam and the rational the examiner used to make this opinion, it seems like the exam would be enough to award service-connection for MDD as secondary to the epilepsy.

One thing to keep in mind there is a provision within the rating schedule regarding mental disorders and seizures under §4.124a, it states;

"Mental Disorders in Epilepsies: A nonpsychotic organic brain syndrome will be rated separately under the appropriate diagnostic code (e.g., 9304 or 9326). In the absence of a diagnosis of non-psychotic organic psychiatric disturbance (psychotic, psychoneurotic or personality disorder) if diagnosed and shown to be secondary to or directly associated with epilepsy will be rated separately. The psychotic or psychoneurotic disorder will be rated under the appropriate diagnostic code. The personality disorder will be rated as a dementia (e.g., diagnostic code 9304 or 9326)"

I hope this helps!

Vike 17

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks for the reply vike 17. here more from the report.

mr. ross has two primary mental disorder including major depression and ptsd, these two have overlapping symtoms of detachment, isolation, decreased concentration. however they appear to be separate primary disorders in this veteran.it is not possible sto fully delineate all symptons as some symtons are interrelated to both disorders.

mr. ross has developed of major depression most likely from partial complex epilesy pt . with this kind of epilesy often have high incidence of psychistric problems including major depression developing from neuroal changes in the brain and from consequence of its treatments with meds. and side effects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

This sounds better. The intertwined symptoms can get rated if only one condition is SC'd. If you get denied with this there are ways to strengthen this report.

The depression single event could continue to be a weak point. In this report the doctor does not mention time frames of the development of the depression, such as long term chronic. Neither does he mention a prognosis such as "recovery is not likely". I have seen doctors write reports indicating conditions that were in remission as spontanously resolving.

The reports that I have seen that I feel are strong say things like "long term and untreatable".

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 1 reply
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use