Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

green

Senior Chief Petty Officer
  • Posts

    450
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by green

  1. Received a call from the local VA medical center Endocrinology department asking me if I was interested in the VA Choice program as they can't see me as soon as they need to.  I knew the program was available for people who lived far from a VA medical center but didn't know they offered it locally.  Any words of wisdom?

  2. I was reading thru my last rating decision which was a request for an increase.  I was wondering if the following wording and thinking is still utilized today?

    2. Claim for increased compensation received July 24, 1994. Outpatient treatment folder notes increasing problems with primary disability as early as November 7, 1993. Analysis: 38 CFR 3.400 generally provides that the effective date for increased evaluation for service connected disability will be the date it is earliest factually ascertainable that a permanent increase in disability has occurred provided a claim is received within one year of that date, otherwise it will be the date of receipt of claim.  Effective date for increased evaluation for primary disability is November 7, 1993

     

    Would the same thinking be applied to requests for ratings on secondary conditions (i.e. the issue is well documented up to a year prior to the claim date)?

     

     

  3. waccamawwild,

    I went down this same road about 9 months ago, filed a NOD regarding the effective dates in eBenefits as my primary disability has been in place over 22 years and they had an effective date of 2007.  I received a call from the RO letting me know that eBenefits is not the official record (as broncovet shared) and that my C-File did in fact list the correct date.  I share this to hopefully avoid stress and worry on your part.

    Green

  4. I'd keep all your records, perhaps they can serve as a basis for a more accurate reimbursement once the VA changes to this "new system that meets the intent of the law" which has yet to be identified/created.  I wonder if they have ever heard of mapquest or google?

  5. wes1,

    I believe they shut it down.  Its been offline for what seems like a couple months.  I'm guessing that it was providing vets with additional information (not available on the regular site) which led to intelligent questions.  It seems the VA doesn't want vets to really know anything regarding the status of their claims.  Sorry to sound so snarky but I can't figure any other reason for it being disconnected.

  6. N4L

    I had a CT scan a number of months ago regarding my issue with diabetic autonomic neuropathy (symptoms similar to IBS).  When I read the report they were able to determine several things which surprised me.  They noted that I had broken my lower back at some point (news to me), had tissue issues with my lungs they likened to COPD (never smoked), enlarged heart (since debunked by a private cardiologist), and several enlarged lymph nodes in my groin.  They also called for a more detailed MRI as a result of this test

    The cardiologist told me that radiologists read things that may or may not be the complete story.  I tell you this so that you wait until the MRI is complete and they have more information before you get overly (possibly) concerned.

  7. MCCFR, I don't have a VSO.  I (and other vets that choose to pursue claims on their own) are at the mercy of what the VA is willing to tell us regarding the status of our claim.  This means we can call the 1-800 number, ask a VA employee through the chat feature on ebenefits or submit an IRIS question.  The problem is that none of these resources provide the vet with specific or detailed information regarding the status of the claim.  We are forced to wait until the claim is decided and receive formal notification as to the official decision. 

     

    However, if we appoint a power of attorney the POA has the ability to gain detailed information about our claims.  I don't think it's right that I should have to give another person or entity the ability to speak, make decisions on my behalf to gain this detailed information.  The VA should be forced to provide this same detail to vets who don't elect to be represented by a POA.

     

    Some veterans representatives are very good, some are not.

  8. This is the explanation IRIS provided:

    Although your claim was submitted as a fully developed claim (FDC) the regional office (RO) is still required to obtain any evidence, on your behalf, they deem necessary in making a correct decision on the claim.

    Your records from Oregon were first requested on November 18; however, the fax request was not received from the RO. The RO again requested the records on December 22, 2015. The VA medical center indicated it could take up to 10 weeks to provide these to the RO.

     

  9. I don't really know where to post this question but I want to present my situation and ask how it could play out.

    • Veteran is medically discharged out of service for diabetes, service connected, rated at 20%.
    • 5 years after initial rating, veteran asks for secondary rating of peripheral neuropathy, cursory exam, denied due to supposed lack of evidence.
    • 11 years after initial rating veteran asks for reevaluation of primary disability, submits request for secondary rating of peripheral neuropathy and ED.  Veteran awarded increase in primary rating of diabetes under the existing (at that time) rating schedule.  Basis for 60% met, criteria requires secondary conditions that are not due their own rating.  Basis for 100% criteria requires secondary conditions that could be rated separately.  Veteran is denied peripheral neuropathy and ED based on supposed lack of evidence.  The decision provided to the vet does not include rights in terms of appeal or disagreement.
    • 2 years following the increase in rating the VA changes diabetes rating criteria to include hospitalizations for the 60% and 100% ratings, veteran does not receive a reevaluation for the 20+ years the increased rating is in effect.
    • 20+ years after increase in primary increase the veteran files a FDC for secondary conditions related to peripheral neuropathy, autonomic neuropathy, diabetic retinopathy and ED.  This time vet seeks C&P for PN outside VA, has a Nerve Conduction Study that proves PN exists, and provides records to the VA.  The VA conducts C&P exams on all conditions claimed and concurs that there is a greater than 50% chance conditions are due to primary disability and C&P exam indicates moderate severity on contentions related to neuropathy.
    • VA requests records from States the veteran hasn't lived in for 20+ years but did have records related to previous claims and denials.

    I realize there is a lot here, I'm still trying to figure out why a FDC is taking so long for the VA to make a determination.

     

    Thank you!

    Green

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use