Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Att'n All Hands: Cong. Filner

Rate this question


Berta

Question

from Colonel Dan and other vet orgs:

PS all Congressman Filner will be our guest speaker again on August 1, 2007 at SVR Veterans broadcast-podcast www.stardustradio.com

---------------------

"To contact the Committee, please write to:

House Committee on Veterans' Affairs

335 Cannon House Office Building

Washington, D.C. 20515

or call: (202) 225-9756

Filner says PTSD misdiagnoses cheat vets

By Rick Maze - Staff writer

Posted : Thursday Jun 28, 2007 20:43:46 EDT

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/06/mili...edvets_070628w/

The chairman of the House Veterans Affairs Committee plans a summer attack on the military’s disability review system, hoping that congressional hearings focusing on what he called the “terrible scandal of deliberate misdiagnosis” of mental health problems could lead to an overhaul of government policies.

Rep. Bob Filner, D-Calif., said he expects to have veterans testify they were improperly diagnosed as having pre-existing personality disorders rather than post-traumatic stress disorder, a move that denies service members military disability benefits and could, under some circumstances, even leave them with no post-service veterans’ benefits if their mental health problems have led to misconduct, such as abuse of alcohol or drugs.

“This is a real scandal, in my opinion, to save a few dollars ... that wrecks lives,” Filner said Thursday in a meeting with reporters to talk about committee plans.

Dates for the hearings have not been set, but he mentioned August — when Congress generally takes a break — as a possibility in order to draw extra attention to the testimony.

Filner accused the military of “purposeful misdiagnosis” and of misleading service members into believing that accepting a pre-service personality disorder as the root of their problems would still leave them with government help.

“There were lies, real lies,” Filner said.

Filner said he has raised the issue with the Army, which said it had reviewed instances in which Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans were determined to have personality disorders rather that combat-related mental health issues. Army officials said they did not find any instances of misdiagnosis.

“I guess they just went back and asked the doctors who made the diagnoses if they made any mistakes, and they all said they hadn’t,” Filner said.

The Senate Armed Services Committee has tried to address the issue in a bill to improve the government’s policies for wounded combat veterans. Under the Senate bill, S 1606, a person who has spent 30 or more days on active duty is presumed to be in sound physical and mental condition for the purposes of establishing eligibility for disability retired pay. The only exception would be if there is “compelling evidence” or medical proof the disability existed before military service began.

Filner said he had not seen the Senate proposal but agreed with the concept that the government should not look for excuses to deny benefits to military members and veterans.

“We need to change the adversarial process,” Filner said, adding that his long-term goal would be to attempt a dramatic change in the veterans’ health care system so that simply being a veteran would be sufficient to receive treatment, without having to first prove that an injury, illness or disease is service-connected."

__._,_.___

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Gee, the military cheating vets out of compensation by saying they have Personality disorders instead of PTSD or some other mental disorder? It happened 37 years ago to me and it is still going on today. How many thousands of vets were screwed out of benefits during that time? I was lucky since I got it turned around, but the VA is still trying to say my problems are due to a PD even after paying me at the 100% rate for mental/emotional disorder. It has only taken Congress 40 years to catch on to this fact. I guess Vietnam vets were not important enough for anyone to care if we got our lives ruined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is dejavu Vietnam all over again-

they got away with this then and many vets didnt appeal-

these days there is too much info on the net to help vets fight this stuff for them to get away with it much-- maybe----

hope those SOs know more about PTSD then they used to-

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What ever happened to a presumption of health when entering the military? The regs are in the veterans' favor; they're just not being applied correctly. Perhaps with a government push they will clear it up.....PD is a very rare issue and not very well understood. There is NO way that many people have PD from the military...NO WAY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Presumption of soundness" is still there...it's just that most vets probably aren't informed enough about it or, they just don't have the long-haul perseverance to continue their claim, or, they accept an initial denial decision and just give up. And other vets, for whatever reasons, just can't argue these points of their claim effectively...this kind of vet needs a very good VSO to do it for him/her.

-- John D.

What ever happened to a presumption of health when entering the military? The regs are in the veterans' favor; they're just not being applied correctly. Perhaps with a government push they will clear it up.....PD is a very rare issue and not very well understood. There is NO way that many people have PD from the military...NO WAY.
Edited by cloudcroft

70% TDIU/P&T

Army - RVN - 1969-70 (10th Cav/4th ID, II Corps RVN)

USCG - Galveston, TX - 1976-78 (USCGC Valiant, WMEC 621)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use