Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Diagnosis

Rate this question


ammodad

Question

hello once aagain my friends its me , i am writing this to ask a question that has been eating away at my wife and i . when does the word diagnosis stop meaning what its meant to ? is it when its in a vets favor or just when they feel like changing the meaning . identifying the nature or cause of some phenomenon . is just one of the deffs listed ..

if i go to a c@p exam and the doctors notes under diagnosis on my records state lung disease , status post asbestos exposure .

i was told by some people that that could mean anything but after going to the va respiratory therapist she tells me i shouldnt even be there that that diagnosis should have settled my claim . so i am asking some of you who may know if you dr diagnosis you with a brain tumer and says status is post the exposure of the 2x4 you took to the head what does that mean is there a double meaning hidden there or does it mean your tumer came from a wack to the skull ... some people would argue with you and say well the tumer could have already been there the 2x4 just made it act up or that aint what we really meant by post exposure from my understanding post in medical terms means after the fact like post mortem which means after death , example we took his arms post mortem or we did the autopsy post mortem ....

if i am missundertsanding any of this please set me straight? if iam right let me know that also i am tired of guessing at what this means .. lost in translation

WESLEY LIVINGSTON JR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I also agree with Berta's post on this.

My concern is the Nexus connection. The C&P doc apparently put post asbestos exposure on the diagnosis ---- BUT DID NOT relate it to military service, did not refer to evidence in SMR's or

any letter penned by an active duty supervisor, from what I read, listed in ammodad's post.

The rater might not connect the dots, and I think if the C&P doc would have backed up the part of the diagnosis (post asbestod exposure) from evidence I listed above, then there would be MUCH less problemo.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
my then supervisor sent in a hand written statement o the affect that during the time of my active duty that every boiler room we worked in was covered in asbestos and that myself along with others worked in it on a daily basis . it was even documented in my military paper work and highlighted in my exit papers if that isn't nexus enough for them what is ? not to mention he fact hat i came in perfect health and or what ever that is to them

Ships built before 1975 did have Asbestos insulation on most of the steam piping systems. As for exposure, Boiler Techs and Machinest Mates did get exposed. ( See Navy Pies List). The most difficult part in the exposure is proving it. The VA and Navy will say that the steam pipes were covered with insulation and paint thus sealing the asbestos inside. One issue was when a ship took a hit or the piping burst or the insulation became damaged and allowed the fibers to become airborne. If you ever have documented insulation work or lagging experience and actually removed asbestos your chances of Service connection are increased especially if it is stamped on your medical record like mine is,it is not cut and dry as they have been denying my asbestos claim for years.

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Ammodad, first, ya got a great name here! Secondly, I agree that 'post" has different meanings based upon the subject being discussed. I have read and reread the replies here and seeing the diagnosis statement, lung disease, status post asbestos exposure seems concrete in itself. Do I understand that you have lung disease because of 'past" exposure to asbestos? I am sorry that you have to deal with this, do you have a civilian doctor that treats you? If so, the Dr. can that confirm and interepet the VA diagnosis as well. (also known as IMO).

If your respiratory therapist wants to give you a written statement, thats good too,just not enough to L-I-N-K your military service rendered to your health condition today.

So if I get your question, you wanted this 'statement" interpeted. I am not medical any more than the next veteran here. So we guess on your behalf and hope to have helped.

Where are you at in your claim process, did you just complete your C&P or was that a while back? Whats your next step? or, how are you going to prove, with paperwork, that you were exposed while in the military? You can reply here or if you use search for a claims checklist.

Again, good advice from Carlie and Berta - you are on your way.

Best of luck and keep asking questions.cg

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use