Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Waiting And Nervous

Rate this question


bluenote

Question

Since the last time I looked for help here w/no success--I searched the Internet and finally came up with someone willing to help,I found out that my claim that I filed a few years ago for Guillain Barre Syndrome and was given Medical only by the VA-- should have been Rated and triggered a VA Reconsideration to determine if my discharge was under Other Than Dishonorable conditions. For some reason they didn't do this........... Thanks Dan

Edited by CaravanDan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I apologize to anyone who read my earlier reply here as I have deleted it , after going over many past posts here on this matter at hadit as well as doing a complete review of some established VA case law (38 U.S.C.A. §§ 101(2), 5107, 5303 (West 2002 &

Supp. 2009); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.1, 3.12 (2009).

and I find now I have no comment, idea, or reply that could help this veteran.

The idea I posted earlier will not work.

Hopefully someone else will reply.

I see no evidence here that Dan has ever applied to the BCMR (Board of Corrections for Military Records)(for discharges over 17 years old) or to the DRB for correction of his discharge (for applicants with less then 15 years after discharge)which would produce a possible correction of discharge result that would be binding on the VA. In this letter he mentioned it indicates the VA has already made a character of discharge determination.

I hoe they sent him appeal rights when he got that COD letter.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I wonder if the President can pardon a felon why not a Veteran with bad paper?

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I wonder if the President can pardon a felon why not a Veteran with bad paper?

Use to be one could have their dishonorable upgraded to a General if they kept their nose clean and stayed out of trouble for a certain number of years.But if the Vet,has been in jail or has gotten a arrest record since discharge, they are out of luck.But that was 40 years ago and alot has changed since then.The President or Congress can make anything happen if they CHOOSE to!! Congress just adds the request to a BILL that will pass and the President just decrees it to happen. Most of the time it happens after we the Vet have been gone for 50 years and it was requested by our RICH/Politically connected family members.(it is better PR if we are dead) Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

It may be helpful to post the underlying charges related to your Chapter 10 (discharge in lieu of court-martial). The document you scanned will have the alleged charges in the three or four pages prior to the one scanned. If it was for AWOL, the charge sheet will allege over 180 days as a sentence aggravator. If charged as desertion, I believe there is a statutory bar to benefits. If the AWOL was over 180 days there is a separate analysis for compelling reasons why you were AWOL. FYI, Fort Dix is not normally an active-duty assignment so pretty rare to have adminstrative discharges for active-duty soldiers occurring under that command.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On ‎7‎/‎16‎/‎2012 at 11:25 AM, Berta said:

I apologize to anyone who read my earlier reply here as I have deleted it , after going over many past posts here on this matter at hadit as well as doing a complete review of some established VA case law (38 U.S.C.A. §§ 101(2), 5107, 5303 (West 2002 &

Supp. 2009); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.1, 3.12 (2009).

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thank you all for your Help!!!

Edited by CaravanDan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use