Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dod Pulls Pd

Rate this question


Berta

Question

http://www.vawatchdog.org/07/nf07/nfDEC07/nf122207-1.htm

Their estimates seem impossible -wonder if they will re-post the article.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta

It is just the military still trying to justify discharging sick vets under the PD diagnosis. I know how this works and it is a rotten thing to do to a vet who is having emotional problems. I would not trust the DOD as far as I could throw them. Now that this Iraq thing seems to be slowing down they are going to want to get rid of all those PTSD victims and do it cheaply. In the waning days of Vietnam they did not even try to treat the drug addicted vets but kicked them out under PD. They send them to countries where drugs are so abundant like the Golden Triangle. The young troops get addicted through ignorance and then get kicked out with bad paper. It happened so often in Vietnam. Afghanistan is going to be the next big fiasco with opium and heroin being grown to excess in that country. The dope will find its way to the American bases. It will flow in cheaply and in quanity and the military will try and cover it up. If you admit to drug abuse you get a PD diagnosis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I were any of the troops that have been courts-martialed, I would scream PD and blame it on the military for letting me in then sending me into a situation that they new mentally unstabled people were not to be placed in. Maybe their defense attorneys will pick up on this quickly. jmho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man this suck! all those young men, like my self like other will walk the earth feeling gloom and doom not knowing why they just can't fix it or it go away with time. The government should feel shame. Set these soldiers out like that, the worse thing in the world is someone in that state of mind with a weapon thats train to kill and no direction, benefits is just part of the problem. I swear it looks like the military is the luckiest in the world in a population as large as ours and pick so many with personally disorders. Tell you the truth I think I liked it better when PTSD wasn't a house hold name....RC

GENERAL GEORGE S. PATTON, JR.

"Do more than is required of you."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.vawatchdog.org/07/nf07/nfDEC07/nf122207-1.htm

Their estimates seem impossible -wonder if they will re-post the article.

I know that many soldiers were discharged during Desert Storm for "personality disorder" as an expeditious mechanism to get rid of soldiers who were involved in misconduct and/or insubordination.

Not everyone (or even the majority)who receives a discharge for a personality disorder is suffering from PTSD. Just my humble opinion...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not saying they all or the majority have PTSD. However, I do not feel they have a personality disorder either. I see civilians almost daily that do have personality disorders and about 90 percent of them are really messed up and you can spot that they have problems from a mile away. Now, if these young guys and gals all had PD then the doc's at the reception must have been really dumb. Even if you were allowed to just sit by and watch the pre-entrance medical exams you would be able to identify them. Now with that said what the hell does this say for our military. Do not get me wrong, I love my Army and will defend her to the end. However, it just ain't right if the military is letting these guys and gals enlist with such a disease. Good God, do you know how much money is spent on them just for the training received to get them to their first duty station? not to mention training received at their units, then to get them ready to deploy etc....... Now a majority of the guys and gals they are talking about are reserve and national guards. However, the same holds true for them. Their entire career is is spent training year round with this and that. If you were a decision maker would you allow one to sign on with a PD?

Now some people were just not cut out to be in the military. They do not suffer from a personality disorder - maybe an adjustment order or something like that if there is such a thing. They are not bad kids, just that the strict displine of the military makes them rebell etc... however, once again this is and would be spotted very early on most likely in basic as basic attempts to mentally strip you and rebuild you. So if they fall into this category does this mean that the service is saying yep they ain't gonna make it but lets use them for a deployment or two and then kick them to the curb. Now if the military is using this as a hurry up and get rid of them discharge it is more wrong that two boys making whoppie in the back of a 55 Chevy (I did not say that did I?) as it casts a wrong picture of guys and gals suffering from PTSD.

Bottom line is that something is seriously wrong here - something that needs a closer look. And as I said in my below post if I were a whoppi da doo defense attorny I would be watching this close and throw it back at them at the trial. jmho

Edited by Ricky
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use