Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Received Letter Today:

Rate this question


Josephine

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Received letter today:

1992 - 1996 - 10%

1997 - 2004 - 50%

2005 to present 70%

Husband was not added

They gave me 10% in 1992 because I had been married for twenty years,

got along with my spouse, and children and had some friends. But they

also put in that I quit working in a public place in 1983 because I

favored to work at home.

A treatment record from Dr. Payne dated August 31,

1983, noted you worked a high stress job at Enxxx Mxxxxx. However,

there is no indication that you were having trouble handling that

stress. Several personal events occured over the years, causing acute

increases in your anxiety.

I never once said that I wanted to work at home, I would like to see

that in writing.

No mention of how much retro.

Will wait for check, cash it, and then hire a lawyer or write the NOD

myself.

Thanks Betty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

And she is STILL married!...just longer now...

Free

YES- enjoy the cash Josephine and then NOD this!!!!And Attach the TDIU form to the NOD-and you can get a lawyer under the June 20,2007 NOD regs-

and enjoy this Victory- it isnt want you want yet but I am sure it will be-

I wonder what happened to the 100% they said you would get-it is beyond me- but then again-you certainly can fight this.

Thats good -they say how long you have been married but forget to add in comp for your husband-

Does it say exactly why they did not give you TDIU or 100%?

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Betty, fill this out and send it in if you have not already done so.

http://www.vba.va.gov/pubs/forms/VBA-21-686c-ARE.pdf

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you are 10% disabled when you can stay married for 20 years, but 70% disabled when you can stay married for 44 years.

Their logic makes no sense. LOL

Free

Free,

Only about 44 years now. I will take my money and keep my mouth shut for about one month and then continue on.

Always,

Betty

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Free,

My arm is shocking me to death. Going to try Acupuncture this morning. Write me up a good NOD on that one.

I am thankful I have a year to get all of this mess together.

Thanks

Betty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure where I got this info - but found it in my files. IT says the VA is will require VA form 21-8940 before they PAY TDIU benefits, but the VA is obligated to consider and adjudicate the claim, regardless of whether the form is filed.

So if they are ASKING you to file the form - they may already have determined you are eligible to TDIU - but can't PAY until the form is submitted.

I would think that once the form is submitted they SHOULD pay you pretty easily back to the date your SC disability was granted a percentage greater than 60%. And they should pay all the way BACK to that date, as there was ample evidence in your file that you couldn't work, but they did not send you the form before now.

TDIU CAN be granted when the SC disability is rated at LESS than 60%, but it is harder to get - I don't think the RO can even grant them - they have to be specially decided higher up.

"5.4.9 How to Apply for TDIU

VA Form 21-8940, Application for Increased Compensation Based on Unemployability, is the prescribed form for claiming individual unemployability (TDIU).53 The VA will require that a veteran complete and submit a VA Form 21-8940 before it will formally pay a claim for TDIU benefits.54 However, a veteran is not required to file this application form before the VA is obligated to consider and adjudicate a TDIU claim. When a veteran files an original claim for evaluation of a disability or a claim for an increase in the evaluation of a disability that has already been rated by the VA, the claimant is generally presumed to be seeking the highest benefit allowable.55 If either claim includes facts that indicate that the veteran is unemployable, the VA is obligated to consider and adjudicate a TDIU claim.56 For example, a veteran files a claim for a rating increase for an anxiety disorder, included in the evidence in the veteran’s claims file is a statement from a psychiatrist that the veteran’s mental disability precludes him from being able to work. Because of this evidence, the VA is obligated to consider and adjudicate the veteran’s entitlement to TDIU.

Advocates should not wait to file claims for TDIU until the VA sends them the application form. The advocate should simply send the VA a letter stating that his or her client wishes to be considered for TDIU benefits and asking the VA to send all appropriate forms so that the client’s claim can be perfected.

**Advocacy Tip** Some veterans who have inferred claims for TDIU may be entitled to

an earlier effective date for their TDIU benefits.57 In Servello v. Derwinski,58 the court held that the existence of an inferred claim for TDIU might have entitled the veteran to an earlier effective date because under 38 U.S.C.S. § 5110(:rolleyes:(2), the effective date of an award of increased compensation shall be the earliest date as of which it is ascertainable that an increase in disability occurred if the application is received within one year from such date.

The court reasoned that because under 38 C.F.R. § 3.155(a), the VA was required to, but

did not, forward to the veteran a TDIU application form, the one-year filing period for such application did not begin to run.59 Thus, as a matter of law, the inferred claim submitted prior to the date of a formal TDIU application must be accepted as the date of claim for effective date purposes."

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use