Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

They Reduced Me Anyways!

Rate this question


souldeliverer

Question

After my hard work in compiling evidence, the VA reduced my PTSD from 100% to 70%. If that wasn't enough, they also proposed to reduce my migraines from 30% to 10%!!! What is really going on at my RO? What should I do from here on out? Could this be age discrimination? Have I unwittingly made an enemy within the RO?

I am faxing and mailing my TDIU form tomorrow, and submitting a hearing request for the migraine reduction. Also, they are leaving my back comp at 10%, which I believe should be at least 30% for all the dang narcotics they have me on.

Can I submit an NOD for the PTSD reduction while simultaneously filing for TDIU???

Please look up my other posts for background info, or I can look them up if need be. I really need help with this one. I am getting jacked.

Please see: Had My Hearing For Ptsd Proposal To Reduce

Thank you all.

Edited by souldeliverer

Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.

-Patrick Henry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

How sucky!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I am thinking they have to meet a higher standard of proof to reduce your rating than they do to not give it to you in the first place.

I would think you could file an NOD while your TDIU is pending. They seem to like to have vets with all different things going on at all different stages - hoping they will lose track of the appeal dates and have to start over.

Did you already have an "inferred" claim for TDIU going on? (i.e. there was already evidence in the file that you weren't working?

You MIGHT want to indicate that the FORM is PERFECTING your TDIU claim - and that much of the evidence is already of record.

I don't even know if they can reduce the benefits while you are appealing - so I am no help there. But someone WILL come along who WILL be able to help!

DON'T GIVE UP!!

Free

After my hard work in compiling evidence, the VA reduced my PTSD from 100% to 70%. If that wasn't enough, they also proposed to reduce my migraines from 30% to 10%!!! What is really going on at my RO? What should I do from here on out? Could this be age discrimination? Have I unwittingly made an enemy within the RO?

I am faxing and mailing my TDIU form tomorrow, and submitting a hearing request for the migraine reduction. Also, they are leaving my back comp at 10%, which I believe should be at least 30% for all the dang narcotics they have me on.

Can I submit an NOD for the PTSD reduction while simultaneously filing for TDIU???

Please look up my other posts for background info, or I can look them up if need be. I really need help with this one. I am getting jacked.

Thank you all.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll ask a couple of questions: and then gives some advise. I hope someone else with more knowledge will respond as well.

(1) Did they notify you of the proposed reduction of your PTSD, giving you 60 days to submit additional evidence in support of your 100% SC?

(2) What was their reason and basis for the reduction of your 100% to 70%?

In order to reduce your award, the burden of proof for the reduction is on the government. They must back their reason and basis with evidence, not just on the opinion of a C&P exam, since symptoms can increase and decrease in cycles, so it is imparitive that the Adjudicator show that this reduction in symptoms is not temporary in nature.

Besides appealing the PTSD, appeal the back problem as well, try to document that the severity of your back problem with pain is more than 10%. showing that the medications and there strength would not be given except for a person who met the higher rating.

If the VA reduces your PTSD which was at 100% to 70% They must automaticaly determine if TDIU is warrented. For them not to is tantamount to error. However, I would not leave it up to them, I would submit a TDIU claim with your appeal. If they hold to the reduction, then your TDIU claim will be already in motion.

What ever you do, follow through with your appeals from the VARO to the BVA, and to the Court is necessary.

RR <_<

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there was an inferred TDIU tagged on there somehow. My papers say I was denied TDIU because I didn't turn in the form. I didn't send it in because I thought there would be NO WAY they could possibly reduce me, given the evidence provided. This is why I think there is something nasty going on here with the VA. I am guessing they are getting ready to change some laws that will grandfather in those who are at 100%, and those who are TDIU will get the shaft somehow. I am getting paranoid...I would be crazy not to.

How sucky!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I am thinking they have to meet a higher standard of proof to reduce your rating than they do to not give it to you in the first place.

I would think you could file an NOD while your TDIU is pending. They seem to like to have vets with all different things going on at all different stages - hoping they will lose track of the appeal dates and have to start over.

Did you already have an "inferred" claim for TDIU going on? (i.e. there was already evidence in the file that you weren't working?

You MIGHT want to indicate that the FORM is PERFECTING your TDIU claim - and that much of the evidence is already of record.

I don't even know if they can reduce the benefits while you are appealing - so I am no help there. But someone WILL come along who WILL be able to help!

DON'T GIVE UP!!

Free

Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.

-Patrick Henry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for your response.

1.) I was notified and given 60 days. I went to a hearing on May1st and presented a VERY strong case.

2.) You can read my rebuttal by looking up "Had My Hearing For Ptsd Proposal To Reduce"

In the reasons given for the reduction, the main ones were the C&P examiner stated he didn't find me unemployable, which I argued was clearly an error. Also, my social worker put in a note after a telephone conversation with me last week that I had gone fishing and had a good time. How the hell this got slipped into the decision I revieved today is beyond me. It is almost as if they were waiting for something to use against me before they made their decision.

I'll ask a couple of questions: and then gives some advise. I hope someone else with more knowledge will respond as well.

(1) Did they notify you of the proposed reduction of your PTSD, giving you 60 days to submit additional evidence in support of your 100% SC?

(2) What was their reason and basis for the reduction of your 100% to 70%?

In order to reduce your award, the burden of proof for the reduction is on the government. They must back their reason and basis with evidence, not just on the opinion of a C&P exam, since symptoms can increase and decrease in cycles, so it is imparitive that the Adjudicator show that this reduction in symptoms is not temporary in nature.

Besides appealing the PTSD, appeal the back problem as well, try to document that the severity of your back problem with pain is more than 10%. showing that the medications and there strength would not be given except for a person who met the higher rating.

If the VA reduces your PTSD which was at 100% to 70% They must automaticaly determine if TDIU is warrented. For them not to is tantamount to error. However, I would not leave it up to them, I would submit a TDIU claim with your appeal. If they hold to the reduction, then your TDIU claim will be already in motion.

What ever you do, follow through with your appeals from the VARO to the BVA, and to the Court is necessary.

RR <_<

Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.

-Patrick Henry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read the rebuttal. I agree with everyone - very powerfully written.

So is the C&P examiner willing to give you a job?

Are you not allowed to have a nice time? Or not allowed to go fishing?

Tell them, of course I had a nice time fishing. I enjoy maiming all God's little creatures, but they arrest me when I do that to cats!

Free

Thank you for your response.

1.) I was notified and given 60 days. I went to a hearing on May1st and presented a VERY strong case.

2.) You can read my rebuttal by looking up "Had My Hearing For Ptsd Proposal To Reduce"

In the reasons given for the reduction, the main ones were the C&P examiner stated he didn't find me unemployable, which I argued was clearly an error. Also, my social worker put in a note after a telephone conversation with me last week that I had gone fishing and had a good time. How the hell this got slipped into the decision I revieved today is beyond me. It is almost as if they were waiting for something to use against me before they made their decision.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh...by the way... I want to thank you for your service to our country.

The VA WILL thank you also - but it takes time. But when you die and they get to close your file, they send your widow a nice little certificate telling her they appreciated your service to our country.

Just figured you might want to hear it while you are still alive.

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use