Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Diagnosis Change Or Not

Rate this question


Rockhound

Question

Veteran has a current sleep apnea diagnosis supported by a sleep study. Veteran submits a claim for sleep apnea and was scheduled for a C&P examination;

The results of the examination are as follows The VA examiner states, at this time my prefered opinion is that Veterans represents as having Nocturnal Hypoxia and based on the history given, it would be difficult for this examiner to fully support a diagnosis of sleep apnea.

The VA Adjudicator then denies claim stating that a diagnosis change was made and that the Nocturnal Hypoxia was the correct alternative diagnosis.

thus a claim for sleep apnea is declined, since the correct diagnosis was for Nocturnal Hypoxia and veteran's medical hystory is mute on this issue.

Is this a change in a diagnosis and/or was it properly changed?

Yea it's a twist on my claim, but some people just don't get it.

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Rock,

It sounds to me like you are saying that you were treated in the military for a psych condition that was determined to be a personality disorder by military shrinks and you are trying to link it to a current psych condition. Is this what is happening?.

NO! I'm saying that the military treated me for a mental disorder and the VA changed to a PD.

If yes, there are several people on the bosrd who were sucessful in getting the diagnosis made by military shrinks changed to an anxiety disorded and or PTSD and who eventually won their claims. There are several people who have come and gone and lost their claim.

I would be willing to help as I did several other veterans if the evidence from the military is available. It required that the veterans re-enter therapy at a VA and have the VA shrinks review the military records and write a report that you were misdiagnosed in the military.

I'm saying they diagnosis in the service was correct and that the VA claim that it was erroneous was incorrect.

One veteran was sucessful without re-entering therapy at a VA and got an IMO to review the reports and write a report of misdiagnosis. I have not seen any case where C&P exams alone resulted in a change of diagnosis based on misdiagnosis by military shrinks. Believe it or not there are VA shrinks who are of the opinion that the personality disorder diagnoses were misused by military shrinks and they will fight for you tooth and nail. If you are interested in making this effort and you want my assistance I will need to know some specifics before I decide to get involved.

Forget that the in-service diagnosis was misdiagnosed as a PD It was the C&P examiner that made the opinion of a PD, but he also did not say the original diagnosis was wrong and that his current diagnosis was a correction for it.

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What prevents them from providing you with a Nexus statement ???

carlie

I can only surmise that it is an in house directive. or that any statement that could be construed as to possibly being used in a VA Claim, then they are advised not to give such a statement.

I've asked for an a determination as to whether or not if my problems I am having now are related to my inservice psychotic episode and most recently, I am trying to determine if my current problems with attention, memory, fatigue, sleep disturbances, depression, anxiety and a couple of others things are related to the Closed TBI I had in service. I am currently waiting on results from a battery of neuropsychological tests that may be of some indication in that respect. Also they may also be able to conferm a statement I did get put in my medical records, and that is at this time my psychiatrist could not desern from my MMPI and her own observations that I exibited any of the known PD of note. (just a summery not her exact words)

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding Medical opinions VA must honor all requests for the provision of medical statements,

See attached PDF:

Sorry, here again we will probably agree to disagree. VA does not have to honor all requests for provision of medical statements, nor do they have to provide a nexus statement. They must help you fill out medical forms and they can put a discriptive statement in your medical records, but their is nothing that says they must state that your current diagnosis is related to your in-service diagnosis or SC one. They can say that you have a cureent diagnosis and because of it you are unable to work, or walk and need an electric chair or cart.

I imagine if they want to, they can, but if the policy of the hospital is not to give nexus statements, it's going to be hard to get them to do it. If they don't have your complete medical file on which your claim is based on and also is a part of your C-File, nothing says that if you provide them with a copy, they have to read it and then make a nexus statement.

If I read the VHA directive, giving nexus statements is the preview of the C&P examination dept.

RR B)

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Rockhound

You need to do what Josephine has done in regards a medical report. All the rest of it is dancing around on rules and regs that are not going to get you anywhere. You need medical evidence in the form of a review of your records. Half a loaf is better than none, so you may get service connection, but the CUE thing is not the way to go if you need money now. You want to get SC'ed and rated at least as TDIU in your life time. I know you are broke but you are just going to be waiting for years with these CUE claims. You will be older and broker by the time you get denied. Pursue the CUE after you get SC'ed for schizophrenia, anxiety, depression or some combination. The VA will probably do all your claims at the same time so you have time to get it together for straight SC. I am pursuing a CUE but I already have TDIU. If I win that would be great and if I lose then too bad, but I still eat. If the VA can demonstrate that any of your rating was due to difference in judgement you lose. That is why almost all CUE claims fail. They made it like that for a reason which is to deny 99% of those who apply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John made a good point Rockhound-

CUE claims are VERY hard to win-

The VA again denied my CUE claims the other day-

They based this on their statement that my husband had never filed a Section 1151 claim in his lifetime-

He certainly did and it is in the C file-Filed MArch 24, 1994 and confirmed as in the rating board by a Mrs. XXXXX at the RO the AM of his death.I remember her name well and marked the file with her name in 1994.

Hours after he called and spoke to her regarding both of his claims-she was the same 800# rep when I called to report his death.She was extremely upset and remembered talking to him the AM.

I sure might have the Green card from 1994- we saved everything in files-oddly enough- I dont think it would even matter for the CUE if he filed this claim or not but he did.

The problem I have is that VA awarded for multiple malpracticed disabilities but that was at VACO in DC-

The RO failed to rate any of these 1151 disabilities but did pay me Sec 1151 DIC.Even my rep questioned that in 1998 but never advised me to NOD the decision and I should have NOdded it right away-

but still my point here is this-

Fighting a CUE should not be as important as fighting a current claim.

I felt the VA committed a legal error in a past decision you got because- as the BVA case I posted showed- your inservice hospitalization should have generated a rating for residuals of the episode in service.It seemed impossible for me to understand how a vet could have a psychiatric episode in service that he was hospitalized for yet receive no rating for any residuals on it after service.

That seemed to be the point of the BVA case I posted a link to here-

not a CUE but the veteran as I recall did get a SC rating for residuals of something like what you went through.

In the VA denial I just got- not a single piece of the legal evidence I presented was considered.

I have to re-read it carefully to make sure it is not a verbatim denial like the one I already received-

I can raise hell with the RO if it is-

but am not really concerned at this point-

Since the BVA reads claims a heck of a lot better then the RO I will file the I-9 and see what happens with this claim at the BVA.

No sense in me getting upset with it as my main AO claim is what my interest is in-

CUES should be short and only involve legal errors- as a matter of fact not only is there a wealth of info here at hadit on CUES, the VBM is worth the money as to their advise on CUE claims.

You had stated:

"NO! I'm saying that the military treated me for a mental disorder and the VA changed to a PD."

And I agree that this is what seems to have happened.And I felt this was a CUE.

But I have to agree with John- that our current claims are what need our energy on-and your TBI claim makes sense to me and could potentially bring more than the CUE would.

The fact that more and more veterans these days MUST rely on costly IMOs angers me-yet it is often the only way to succeed on our claims.

A C & P doctor can often say anything they want to-and then down the road an IMO can totally knock down their opinion.

It should not be that way.But it is.

I heard from a vet this AM who has been fighting the VA for years and years.

He just had a hearing.

The VA doesnt care what he says as to his condition.

He is not a doctor.

His case might have a chance with an IMO but he has not ever attempted to get an IMO.

The VA knows full well that these IMOs are extremely costly-and that most disabled vets cannot possibly afford to get them.

and then they take the chance that the VARO will ignore them.

Unfortunately as you can see at the BVA web site-

IMOs turn many many claims around.

One claim had four IMOs and the RO had ignored all of them.

The vet was awarded at the BVA.

I would certainly continue the CUE claim if I were you but focus more on your present TBI claim.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel another important aspect for the claim to be granted is:

Claimant must show medical evidence of a current disability - and I have no

idea how to show residuals of MH disability as current disability,

the residuals are XXX & XXX.

I feel as far as the paperwork on the change of DC, the certification

of it, is just a huge red-tape entanglement. I see CUE claims as made on

disability decisions, not on the process of the claim.

I would find some different verbage to use when arguing how VA processed

part of my claim.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use