Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Is This Rateable?

Rate this question


octdevildog

Question

Soon after recieving my 1st anthrax shot I began to have sevre sweating problems. I have been diagnoised with hyperhidrosis, and constantly ruin shirts, my undersarms sweat so much that it saturates my shirts and i dare not wear a shirt of light color or without sometimes 2 undershirts. i know that they do have a clothing allowance available for people with skin conditions that ruin clothing, i also suffer from this in my groin region and underwear does not last long either. (swamp butt 24/7 it seems) very uncomfortable. And there are times when i wake up in night sweats, not just sweaty, but soaked to the bone. The 1st time i thought i wet the bed. I use so much baby powder to try and stay try, but to no avail. Is this something that can be rated and am i wrong for trying to? None of these symptoms were ever present before those shots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you can prove it is related to the Anthrax Vaccine then you have a shot.

See this VA Information.

GENERAL COUNSEL PRECEDENT OPINION ASSESSMENT

VAOPGCPREC 4-2002

What did this opinion hold?

If evidence establishes that an individual suffers from a disabling condition as a result of administration of an anthrax vaccination during inactive duty training, the individual may be considered disabled by an “injury” incurred during such training as the term is used in 38 U.S.C. § 101 (24), which defines “active military, naval, or air service” to include any period of inactive duty training during which the individual was disabled or died from an injury incurred or aggravated in line of duty. Consequently, such an individual may be found to have incurred disability in active military, naval, or air service for purposes of disability compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1110 or 1131.

How does this affect VBA?

This opinion affects VBA procedures - consideration should be given to updating M21-1. The provisions of this precedent opinion can be applied to any vaccination against disease.

What is a brief summary of the background and analysis?

In this opinion, the General Counsel held that an anthrax inoculation given to a veteran during inactive duty training may be considered an “injury” for purposes of determining if a disability should be service connected. This General Counsel opinion did not describe the type of evidence, however, that should be used to establish service connection for a disability that is claimed to be the result of the vaccine. As explained in a notice published by VA in the Federal Register on July 6, 2001, studies reviewed by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) have not reported significant long-term adverse effects of the vaccine. Federal Register, Vol. 66, page 35702, July 6, 2001. As a result, no presumption has been established at this point for a disability that is caused by an anthrax vaccination.

Of course, a claimant may attempt to establish by direct proof that a non presumptive condition was actually caused by an anthrax vaccination. If we deny a claim for service connection for a disability claimed to be caused by an anthrax vaccination, we should explain to the claimant as part of our duty to notify that competent scientific or medical evidence which establishes that the vaccination actually caused the disability is required

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oct,

Welcome to Hadit.

FYI - everyone here is a volunteer so if your question doesn't get a response in

12 minutes just wait a bit.

Above and beyond anything else in getting this claim granted you will need

a doctor to Diagnosis the Condition and provide a Medical Nexus to it

(linking it to your militery service). We as veterans connot connect it to

active duty, this can only be done by a Medical Professional.

Key words are more or as likely as not related to XXXX in Military Service.

carlie

Edited by carlie
more info

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I also have hyperhidrosis. I currently use a prescription deodorant. I am planning to get botox injections under my arms, on my feet and in my hands. The VA may do that for you, I don't know. I have no idea whether it can be rated or not, but I figured at least you can ask about the botox, or deodorant.

We should be angry, but kind; demanding, but polite; and firm but soft-spoken.

SouthernBelle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You need a specialist for that one I think. He needs to write up a really good report to explain the disorder and how you got it from the shot. What do your SMR's say about your condition and when it started etc? You have to show that the condition started after the shots and that you complained about it and were possibly treated for it. If it is five years down the road before you documented it then it will probably be harder. This is something I think you will have to prove since it not presumptive for Gulf War or Iraq War. This will be like trying to prove brain cancer from Agent Orange. It might be caused by AO in a specific case but you have to prove it. That ain't easy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use