Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Hep C

Rate this question


gp747

Question

DUE TO HIS HISTORY AND PRESENT CONDITION OF DEPRESSION HE IS NOT A CANDIDATE FOR TREATMENT. ALSO A HEPATITIS C RNA IS COLLECTED BUT HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED AT THIS TIME. :F ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NEEDED YOU MAY CONTACT THE US AT - ———

when i was discussing treatment options for my hep.c the doc's agreed i was

too mentally unstable to take treatment. my hep c is left unattended and i

run the risk of eventually having a liver transplant or dieing of HEP.C

would this be considered a claim of its own or would it be considered for

some type of secondary type claim.

i found this looking through my recently acquired records and noticed on

denial from a while back they kind of edited what was said. they said on denial

"trying to make it trivial", that was not candidate for treatment and left it at that.

Edited by skunk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

DUE TO HIS HISTORY AND PRESENT CONDITION OF DEPRESSION HE IS NOT A CANDIDATE FOR TREATMENT. ALSO A HEPATITIS C RNA IS COLLECTED BUT HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED AT THIS TIME. :F ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NEEDED YOU MAY CONTACT THE US AT - ———

when i was discussing treatment options for my hep.c the doc's agreed i was

too mentally unstable to take treatment. my hep c is left unattended and i

run the risk of eventually having a liver transplant or dieing of HEP.C

would this be considered a claim of its own or would it be considered for

some type of secondary type claim.

i found this looking through my recently acquired records and noticed on

denial from a while back they kind of edited what was said. they said on denial

"trying to make it trivial", that was not candidate for treatment and left it at that.

just trying to figure out how to make this a secondary claim or whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

skunk,

What does the medical evidence say the nexus (connection) of the

Hep C is - why do you have it ??

Are you service connected for it.

Did you have tatoos prior to military ?

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

skunk,

What does the medical evidence say the nexus (connection) of the

Hep C is - why do you have it ??

Are you service connected for it.

Did you have tatoos prior to military ?

carlie

i am not service connected for it, i tried and was denied because of tattoo

but since i have been sc for bi-polar , which is cause of them denying treatment

i was wondering , i was wondering if some how it would be considered secondary

for worsening condition as i am not able to take treatment because of side effects

suicidal and other side effects

I COULD HAVE GOTTEN THE TREATMENT ,IF IT WAS NOT FOR MY BI-POLAR SITUATION I WAS ELIGIBLE BUT THEY CONSIDERED IT TOO

RISKY WITH MY MENTAL CONDITION FOR WHICH I AM NOW SC FOR

Edited by skunk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Skunk

That is like the VA saying because you are mentally unstable they are not going to treat a cancer if you had it. If I had hep c that would make my depression much worse. You can appeal medical decisions that deny care. You go to the medical director. Are they going to wait until your liver fails? The only good vet is a dead vet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Skunk

That is like the VA saying because you are mentally unstable they are not going to treat a cancer if you had it. If I had hep c that would make my depression much worse. You can appeal medical decisions that deny care. You go to the medical director. Are they going to wait until your liver fails? The only good vet is a dead vet.

the reason they did not want to treat it was because of the side effects , which are

suicidal , and all kinds of stuff depression, all the things i am already suffering from and

if i took the treatment it would compound my mental illness, which i agree with. they

were willing to give me treatment ,but a person with my type of mental illness would

probably have to be inpatient to be observed. my wife was scared of it ,and from what i have read about it it could get serious. what i have been trying to say shouldnt this be a

type of secondary claim to my 30% bi-polar as my condition will worsen without treatment.

Edited by skunk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use