Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Got C-file

Rate this question


gp747

Question

  • Answers 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Skunk...

I'm not going to bore you with details about my case, but kindly take the time to read this, just in case there are similarities.

After reading yours, I believe that we do have similarities, but I'll leave that for you...

In 1976, I was honorably discharged with a S/C in regard to a Left hip condition with a slipped Knowles pin penetrating the joint space.

I was diagnosed by a VA doctor with atrophy, Osteoarthritis, and a "Slipped Prosthesis".

A decision rendered ONLY for a 10% disability rating. When you check the codes, it shows a definite UNDER RATING!

Over the coarse of many years, I complained of not being able to cross my left leg over my right, in many different ways, but again, it was overlooked or outright ignored.

ROM is followed to the letter, but why am I having a difficult time putting on socks and shoes?

Atrophy supports my claim to the deterioration of muscle, and a pin penetrating the joint just further supports that I cannot turn the hip in a position like everyone else.

Yet, throughout the years, the DVA does not make mention of these conditions, nor am I awarded for it.

In 1980, I was diagnosed with Severe Osteoarthritis, and this time was awarded 20%.

Again...there's no mention or compensation for Atrophy or a "Slipped Prosthesis".

This was clearly ignored by doctors and adjudicators.

In 1989, I was diagnosed with a Severely deformed hip head, and finally, the DVA got off it's ass, and installed a THR.

For years, I suffered with severe osteoarthritis, a slipped pin in the joint space, and an inability to twist my leg to reach under my foot.

To date, I still cannot twist my leg and cross it over my right.

I filed a claim in 2002, and during the time it took to review, and resolve the issues, it mysteriously disappeared.

Just recently, I submitted a 17 page letter, and THIS time, I addressed everything having to do with this claim. I also voiced my disgust with the treatment, the controversial statements made in my entire file, LIES and inaccuracies told about ROM even when I could not put on socks and shoes like others can, and my right to Due Process (5th Amendment) pertaining to a "Motion to Reconsider" my 1151 claim, and my reuqest being met, or else I file a $25,000,000.00 suit!

By next month, the BVA is going to render a decision. I hope (for their sake) that it is favorable. If it isn't, I am going for the grand enchilada!!!

I also foresee this going to the US Supreme Court.

The moral of the story is...

If it takes you a week to search every single solitary piece of paper...DO IT!

You will be surprised at all you find. Find controversial statements, and make a showing that it was WRONG, and look at every issue that you presented and see the accompanying BVA decision made to see if it was addressed. If not, (as Rentalguy stated), it is still open!

Remind these jackasses of this, and constantly hound them about it!!!

Sooner or later, it will pay off for you!

Good Luck, and I look forward to seeing you post on the Success Forum on hadit! :P

thankyou skunk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

keep on going through my c-file and where i filed for tinnitus remember c and p examiner was adament to get me to admit construction noises could cause deafness,

i said i suppose it could if you were put to the extreme,however i never held a job long enough to warrent that kind of speculation.

now as i go through my c-file doctors keep on mentioning concussion,which they could not find records where i was hit in the head with a chunk of metal from a lawnmower at ft bragg. docs keep on saying concussion but c and p examiner would not let me get a word in edge wise to contradict what he said . bunch of jerks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I found a medical report in my C-File from 1973 that may win me a CUE that would be big bucks. You never know what you might find in there including some other vet's NOD that the VA claims was lost 20 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use