Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Got The Decision Today. Good News, But.

Rate this question


OldDave

Question

I applied in July for SC for DMII as a result of AO exposure with CAD and HBP as secondary. The award letter gives me 20% for DMII, 60% for CAD and 10% for each limb for PN. VA math = 80% total. The HBP was denied. The 60% for CAD is because the VA Echocardiogram Tech at the C&P gave me an Ejection Fraction of 40%. No stress test necessary. I got a copy of my C&P exam report. Blood work also showed a Creatinine level of 1.6. This indicates possible kidney problems. The award letter states the VA will be sending me for more tests to determine if the kidney disease is SC by way of being secondary to DMII.

Back in April of 2007 my cardiologist did an Echo and Nuke Stress test and called it EF = 72% and METS = 6. Needless to say the EF drop from 72 to 40 and Creatinine level worried me. I had an appointment with my pvt doctor last Monday and told him of my concerns. He ordered an Echo for Tuesday and a 24 hr protein test for next Monday. I don't have the offical results for the echo yet, but the tech told me it would run about 60%. I'm hopeing the protein test shows no problems and no reason for the VA to have to make another decision.

What would be the best way to notify the VA of the error? I plan on filing a NOD to argue that the HBP IS secondary to DMII. Would including it in the NOD be the best way? Once they accept the posibility that the EF is greater than 50% the will want to do a stress test. Maybe I should notify them immediately so that they can schedule a stress along with the kidney tests. I think the stress would reveal METS between 5 and 7, in line with what my cardiologist got. This would yield a rating of 30%. This is what I think it should be. But, what if the VA blows the stress test as well and gives me highter METS and I end up with a rating of 10%. I want to do the right thing, but I don't want to shot myself in the foot.

Any advice would be greatly appriciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I really do not see why you would want to notify the VA tht they made an error. After all the VA leaves it up to us to prove our claim not disprove it.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Well, like my old Grandpappy used to say, he'd say "BOY (I don't think he ever really did know my REAL name!)!"

Anyway, he'd say "BOY, leave them sleeping dogs alone!"

"before ya git bit!"

So, in keeping with my Grandpappy's wisdom, I'd advise you to "leave them sleeping VA dogs ALONE!".

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I applied in July for SC for DMII as a result of AO exposure with CAD and HBP as secondary. The award letter gives me 20% for DMII, 60% for CAD and 10% for each limb for PN. VA math = 80% total. The HBP was denied. The 60% for CAD is because the VA Echocardiogram Tech at the C&P gave me an Ejection Fraction of 40%. No stress test necessary. I got a copy of my C&P exam report. Blood work also showed a Creatinine level of 1.6. This indicates possible kidney problems. The award letter states the VA will be sending me for more tests to determine if the kidney disease is SC by way of being secondary to DMII.

Back in April of 2007 my cardiologist did an Echo and Nuke Stress test and called it EF = 72% and METS = 6. Needless to say the EF drop from 72 to 40 and Creatinine level worried me. I had an appointment with my pvt doctor last Monday and told him of my concerns. He ordered an Echo for Tuesday and a 24 hr protein test for next Monday. I don't have the offical results for the echo yet, but the tech told me it would run about 60%. I'm hopeing the protein test shows no problems and no reason for the VA to have to make another decision.

What would be the best way to notify the VA of the error? I plan on filing a NOD to argue that the HBP IS secondary to DMII. Would including it in the NOD be the best way? Once they accept the posibility that the EF is greater than 50% the will want to do a stress test. Maybe I should notify them immediately so that they can schedule a stress along with the kidney tests. I think the stress would reveal METS between 5 and 7, in line with what my cardiologist got. This would yield a rating of 30%. This is what I think it should be. But, what if the VA blows the stress test as well and gives me highter METS and I end up with a rating of 10%. I want to do the right thing, but I don't want to shot myself in the foot.

Any advice would be greatly appriciated.

My advice, do as these clowns do...

"Sweep it under the Carpet"!

Wait a few years and file a new claim if you want to establish any additional disabilities.

Don't disclose anything that is in your favor, as inaccurate. What you are doing is the honorable thing, but you will find the the DVA is anything BUT! Trust Us...we've been doing this for a while.

In due time, you will agree. :blink:

Just my opinion...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA should have given you a stress test along with the echo. They didn't so it is their fault and their error. Let them live with it since they half-assed your C&P. Big difference between EF of 40 and EF of 70. The error is usually to your disadvantage. This time you win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The VA should have given you a stress test along with the echo. They didn't so it is their fault and their error. Let them live with it since they half-assed your C&P. Big difference between EF of 40 and EF of 70. The error is usually to your disadvantage. This time you win.

Thanks to all of you for your advice and wisdom. I think you are right. I'll just let things play out and see where it goes. The only reason I was going to NOD for the HPB (It is only 10%) is in the event I develope kidney disease it would take that argument away from them. The tests they want to run may SC that issue anyway and I won't need to do the NOD. I'll cross the various bridges as I get to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Wellllll, OldDave, you could file a CUE. However, the VA seldom makes mistakes. ( ??? ) Just ask them. From what you presented here, you don't know for sure anyway. Tests are sometimes just snapshots in time anyway. Are you working? Are you capable of gainful employment? A long time ago, I once notified the VA that I felt that they made a mistake, and wanted a reduced % rating on a service connected disability,... And just like that, they reduced me. Right or wrong, they will be glad to reduce your rating, if you ask. I understand and respect your concern to do the right thing. If you look around, you can find a doctor that will say you are OK. I understand where you're coming from. That's how I stand also, in the real world...

Welcome to OZ. Congratulations on the good news.

post-4811-1230341093_thumb.jpg

Edited by Commander Bob 92-93

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use