Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

What To Do When The Regional Office Violates Regulations?

Rate this question


broncovet

Question

  • Moderator

What can we Vets do when the Regional Office Fails to follow Regulations?

Example: The Cleveland Regional Office is supposed to consider all claims and evidence before rendering a decision. Moody vs Principii says it this way:

"the VA has a duty to “fully and sympathetically develop a veteran’s claim to its optimum,” 251 F.3d at 1384 (quoting Hodge v. West, 155 F.3d 1356, 1362 (Fed. Cir. 1998)), and that this requires the VA to “determine all potential claims raised by the evidence, applying all relevant laws and regulations.”

So, what do I do now that the Cleveland Regional Office "overlooked" my claim for more than 5 years, and refuses to acknowledge it?

I filed a NOD in 2004, and the Regional Office ignored my NOD and "interpreted it as a claim for benefits" instead.

What can we Vets do to force the Regional Office to obey its regulations? All my "Statements in support of claim" as well as 3 NOD's from 2004-2008 have simply been ignored.

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

i wish i knew the answer to that too .regarding the cleveland office i have no

use for them what so ever as my claim somehow went through there. they

are as bad as my ro when it comes to denying claims as far as my experience

goes with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Inspector General, Congress or complain to Sec Peake directly is all I have

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

That is a case where I would haunt my congressman's office until I heard something. No way a claim should take that long. Something is wrong and I bet they lost your claim, or it went in the shredder. Do you have proof of when you filed it and what you filed with it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Bronc,,,,, I would do what John and Pete have suggested. First do you have thee copies and the certified receipts of sending to your VARO any and all of your claims and NODS??? You certainly must do everything by registered and signature receipt on all documents they get from you. This will be the only way you can have your day in court and prove your case that you did file and have NODs too. It all boils down to you have to prove this . Not the VA, even though by law they must ...."assist" you. ) Also who is helping you as far a VSO? They should be holding the VA to respond. It would be wise to contact your Senator , Congressman and make sure your paperwork is well documented. If you prevail and win your claim/award , then retro entitlement could possibly be due back to EED. Earliest Effective Date. I would not sit on this or give up ...just press your dated evidence and move ahead making them respond to your letters and complaints but having someone help you such as VSO/Congressman/Senator offices will also try and keep some sanity to an already crazy situation. Please don't feel that the VA has singled you out because all of us here at Hadit have been or are still putting up with the same old stuff you are talking about. God Bless,C.C. NEVER GIVE UP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

I have copies of the NOD which was stamped received by the Cleveland Regional Office in a timely manner. Where I got the copy, is that I requested a complete copy of my C-file, and it was sent to me by the regional office, so there is no dispute as to whether or not they received it.

I got upset and filed a Writ of Mandamus 4 years later, largely due to inaction on the NOD. In their response to the Writ, the Cleveland Regional Office claimed that my NOD was "interpreted as a claim for benefits" and therefore not valid. However, this is actually false because there was never any benefits awarded or denied on that date. However, my appeal has been effectively terminated as they steadfastly refuse to take any action on in, in spite of my protests.

It looks like the Regional Office can interpret regulations in any manner they see fit, and I can not do anything about it.

If they can just say that the Veterans NOD was interpreted as something else, they can (and have) simply ignored the Veterans NOD. It is like the wolf guarding the chicken house, and giving any count they want on the chickens.

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Please post the exact wording of your NOD that was submitted to/received by the RO, if possible. I don't want to slam a RO without knowing what was sent to them. :rolleyes:

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use