Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dro Review

Rate this question


bern381

Question

Two years ago, I appealed the VA's decision against my claim of depression secondary to service connected disability (chronic shoulder pain). I elected the DRO review, believing that it would be faster. Recently, I have acquired some additional evidence that would support my claim. However, I am hesitant to send it because I fear that it would deny my claims further. The evidence consists of progress notes and a research article entitled " Depression is caused by chronic pain". Should I send this info? Thanks, Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Bern

You want a DRO Hearing. I just wonder after two years how much longer asking for a hearing will take. 2 years for a DRO means you could have gone to the BVA by now. That is what the DRO Review or Hearing is supposed to avoid. There is something wrong with the way they are doing your claim in my opinion. Check the shredder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think I should bring up the shredder when I am submitting evidence :) ? Who should I question about this claim. I have been burning up the 1-800 number and these people are getting mad when I call everyday. You can tell how mad they get when they realize how much I call. Their response is the usual "Your file is with the DRO". How can I ascertain that it is there and not in the shredder? Thanks, Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Bern...

Cleveland VARO is one of the 3 worst VARO's, (in number of documents shredded), according to the VAOIG report. When you go to Cleveland ask for a copy of your Cfile, and compare what THEY have to what you know you submitted. If there are missing documents, then submit a "Special Claims Handling" request per Dr. Peaks fast letter 08-41. OR, if you feel past decisions did NOT reflect all the evidence, ask for Special Claims handling, anyway.

The Cleveland VARO is DOUBLE UNDER THE GUN. First, the Attorney General rates the Cleveland VARO in the "bottom five" in disability compensation. That is, Ohio Veterans get about $4000 per year per Vet LESS than a Veteran in Maine or New Mexico. And NOW, the Cleveland VARO is ALSO one of the three worst for shredded documents. (Gee..I doubt if that is a coincidence, either. Once, when I called VARO Cleveland, I complained to the person asking why VARO Cleveland was one of the lowest compensating VARO's in the nation. She responded that Cleveland was one of the most accurate, suggesting that other VARO's are wrongfully giving government money away. However, with the shredder incident, now we know why Cleveland is so "accurate"..they simply destroy any evidence inconsistent with their own agenda.)

Now the "good" news. After the AG investigation for shredded documents, the Cleveland manager was "promoted", so you may get a fairer "shake" now. Altho now "the shredder master", (former Cleveland VARO manager) will be "deciding" claims from the Central Office, so now everybody's claim will be trying to weave its way past the shredder master. Here is a link:

http://www.vawatchdog.org/08/nf08/nfdec08/nf120408-1.htm

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OOPS!!! I accidently hit the shift key and posted the message. Anyhow. when I request a DRO hearing do I need to put it in writing or do I need to make the request verbally while I am at the VARO?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OOPS!!! I accidently hit the shift key and posted the message. Anyhow. when I request a DRO hearing do I need to put it in writing or do I need to make the request verbally while I am at the VARO?

Everything has to be requested in writing and date stamped.

GENERAL GEORGE S. PATTON, JR.

"Do more than is required of you."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use