Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Counting On A Favorable Decision

Rate this question


free_spirit_etc

Question

I am finally counting on a favorable decision in my son and my claims for Survivor Benefits after a two year battle with Social Security.

The Hearing Office people have been SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO nice - which is a refreshing change from the way we have been treated for the past couple of years.

We had my son's hearing last week.

I got to view his file before the hearing - and notice a comment is on the query screen that says I complain about all actions SS takes, try to play the offices and toll free number against each other and try to refute policy.

???

I didn't try to refute their policies - I tried to get them to FOLLOW their policies!

Anyway - that explains why everyone has been so unhelpful and sometimes downright mean to me when I try to get help.

It sure has been a long battle -- and lots of errors on their part -- (like telling me I couldn't submit proof of support when we applied - but then using my husband's SSD payments soley to calculate his share of support. Wellllllllll - when you leave out his military retirement pay - which was higher than my son and my income combined - yes... you can make it look like he didn't provide near as much support as he did.

But the judge was nice and seemed to be very fair - and wanted to know what the actual facts were.

Wow! How refreshing - the first person in two years that cared about the facts or the truth!!!!

Anyway - he wouldn't tell us how he was ruling - but he said he COULD issue a decision on my claim too - IF it would be favorable (otherwise they would have to give me time to prepare for my own hearing). AND they wanted my information to work on my claim too!!

Woo Hoo!

I am starting to trust in their fairness again.

But I am still appalled at how someone tried to deny us benefits all along.

It went beyond just denying us and making us wait for a hearing - to actually trying to block us from getting a hearing.

THAT - to me - is inexcusable!

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder
I am finally counting on a favorable decision in my son and my claims for Survivor Benefits after a two year battle with Social Security.

The Hearing Office people have been SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO nice - which is a refreshing change from the way we have been treated for the past couple of years.

I'm glad that you had a good hearing, and that the judge seemed to be fair. I am not that familiar with Social Security, however, I have had my fair share of bureaucrats over the past four decades. Your posting was refreshing to read, free sprit etc. You have my most positive thoughts for a favorable outcome.

Edited by Commander Bob 92-93

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope is a good thing. Trust is a better thing. But it is hard to trust those who jerk you around (and unwise to do so)- but Hope - you CAN have hope.

I was totally impressed by everyone at the hearing office. They even let me come over and view the file. And I got to make copies of anything I wanted. They just handed me the file, showed me the copy machine and told me to feel free to make any copies I wanted to. I had filed written requests to see the file for two years and every request was ignored. The hearing office just said - Yes. Here it is.

Wow!

I also found that the judge didn't play all the mind games I was used to. He asked straight questions and wanted straight answers. But he never cut me off - said I could tell him anything I wanted to say, asked questions to help clarify (but I usually felt he was doing that in my favor, not to set me up) - and even at the end he asked if I had anything I wanted to add - and gave us the opportunity to say anything we hadn't been asked about.

They also have something called a pre-hearing conference - where they can resolve some issues before the hearing. Usually your attorney will handle this. I didn't have an attorney - so I wrote to the judge and asked to have a prehearing conference on the issue of my son's legal adoption - to see if we had to call any witnesses to help establish that point. The judge wrote me a really nice letter and said he had already established that point - told me the two issues he would focus on in the hearing - gave me some information about serving as both a representative (to my son) and as a witness, and let me know he was willing to work with us to make sure that the record was adequately developed before he made a decision.

That dispelled some of my fear that they would need ONE thing I didn't have - and decide against my son.

But he assured me that if he found he needed more evidence on any issue, he would tell me what he needed, and how to obtain it, at the end of the hearing. He even said if he found additional testimony was needed, he could schedule another time to hear it.

This wasn't just cut and paste procedures. It was a real letter that really helped easing my fears.

He wasn't there to TRY to deny us. He was there to get all the facts and determine if we were entitled or not in a FAIR way. And he would make sure that our rights were upheld.

His letter was written in clear English so I didn't have to tangle my mind around the words to figure out what he meant.

Actually all Social Security notices are SUPPOSED to be that way.

But get this: This is the stuff the OTHER workers used to write in their decisions:

“documents from proper third party authorities demonstrating on a cost basis or on a funds flow basis, that you, in your household, were receiving at least one half support from the worker in the period after he contracted matrimony with your mother and before he died"

Is that writing that a human being would consider clear and undestandable?

Yes. The hearing was a whole different experience. The judge didn't just listen to pick that one thing out and take out of context to deny us. He listened to hear what we really said.

Keep on Hoping!

Free

SOUNDS LIKE YOU HAD A GOOD HEARING, LIKE BOB SAID YOUR POSTING GAVE ME SOME HOPE FOR MY HEARING COMING UP. HOPE YOU HAVE A FAVORABLE DECISION FREE.
Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Pete! Today is my husband's birthday! I was thinking of getting a Dairy Queen ice cream cake because he liked them so much. But it is ZERO here..BRRRRRR. So I'll celebrate with Hot Chocolate instead.

Free

Still celebrating my wonderful husband!!!!Missing him too - but so happy he was in my life.

Great News Free
Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Free,

So happy for you and your son.

I bet that hot chocolate was good.

I believe it is freezing temps just about everywhere.

Freezing here in Virginia

Again, Congratulations.

Always,

Betty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use