Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

My C&p Exam Notes Are In (just As Expected Not Promising)

Rate this question


TANKERJOE0

Question

HI,I HAD A COPY OF MY C&P EXAMS PRINTED OUT FOR ME TODAY.

SOME MAY REMBER THE DAY I GOT BACK FROM THE EXAMS AND WAS IRATE,DISGUSTED AND DISSAPOINTED.

WELL JUST AS EXPECTED THE DRS NOTES THAT THEY ARE SENDING TO THE VARO ARE CLEARLY UNTRUE AND UNFOUNDED??

I NEED A SUGGESTION.OR MAYBE A EXPERIENCED HADIT MEMBER WHO WOULD BE WILLING TO ANALYZE MY C&P NOTES AND TELL ME WHAT THEY THINK???

I DONT THINK ITS ADVISABLE TO POST ALL THE NOTES ON THE FORUMS

AS IT WILL TAKE ALOT OF SPACE UP?

IF ANYONE IS WILLING TO HAVE ME FWD YOU THE NOTES VIA EMAIL AND GO OVER THEM WITH ME ID BE FOREVER GREATFUL!!!

THANKS AGAIN FOR ALL THE GREAT ADVICE AND SUPPORT THIS HADIT FAMILY PROVIDES TO ME.

I TRULY FEEL I AM AT WAR WITH THE VA AND EVERYONE ON HERE IS ON THE SAME SIDE AND CAN HELP ME.

OTHER WISE ID BE FIGHTING A MUCH BIGGER ENEMY BY MYSELF!!!

TRYING TO CLEAR THROUGH ALL OF THE OBSTACLES THE VA HAS SET UP TO MAKE IT GUT WRENCHING TO GO THROUGH THIS PROCESS. SO MANY GIVE UP.

I WILL NOT GIVE UP.I AM FURIOUS.

I GAVE UP 17 YRS AGO ON THE VA WHEN I FIRST ARRIVED HOME FROM THE WAR.AFTER THE WAY THEY MADE ME FEEL SO I CONTINUED MY MEDICAL TREATMENTS WITH A PRACTICE OUTSIDE THE VA.

I REFUSE TO GIVE UP THIS TIME.

THE VA HAS NOT FOUND A WAY TO MAKE MY PHYSICAL AND EMOTIONAL PROBLEMS GO AWAY OR EVEN MAKE THEM MANAGABLE.

SO IM GOING TO TRY WITH THE HELP FROM HADIT,MY WIFE AND MYSELF TO FIGHT THIS BATTLE TO THE END.

THANKS FOR ANY ADVICE.

SEMPER FI!

TANKERJOE0

SEMPER FIDELIS !!!!! (ALWAYS FAITHFUL)

***THE FEW THE PROUD THE MARINES***

NOT AS LEAN BUT STILL AS MEAN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Tankerjoe, who were you with? I was with Dco 3rd Amtracs (outta 29 Palms), carrying Marines from A 1/7 and attatchd to 3rd Tanks for the war. Task Force Ripper. Lemme know, I might have some links to some documents that will at least document Rippers and 3rd Tanks experiences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The only way to overcome a bad C&P is to find a Doctor who will write an IMO and even refutes the bad C&P. You can complain about the C&P but its unlikely that you can get another one without a Hearing and the Hearing Officer agreeing and ordering a new one.

Good Luck

Sometimes your progress notes can overcome a bad C&P but the best way is with medical evidence from your Service and after you got out.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I have read through these C&P exams, and here are my conclusions and recommendations:

Issue 1, Hearing Loss:

I. According to puretone tests and speech recognition scores, your hearing was within normal limits:

A. When you entered service

B. When you left service

C. Currently

II. This issue will be denied because there is no evidence of direct or secondary service connection

III. Given the chain of evidence, it would not be useful to file a appeal on this issue. It is unwinnable.

Issue 2, Tinnitus:

I. The audiologist stated that it is less likely than not that your tinnitus was caused by military service.

A. He qualified this statement by quoting the NOISE MANUAL (fifth ed.), which states "only seldom does noise cause a permanent tinnitus without also causing hearing loss."

B. Your puretone audiograms and speech recognition scores do not show you to have hearing loss.

I. This issue will be denied because there is no evidence of direct or secondary service connection.

III. A denial could possibly be averted with a Independent Medical Opinion from another audiologist that states the tinnitus is at least as likely as not caused by military noise exposure. This audiologist would have to refute the information quoted from the NOISE MANUAL in the C&P.

Issue 3, PTSD:

I. There are comments in the C&P report that are hurtful, but not harmful.

A. Childood issues

1. Raised by step father

2. Special education classes for being disruptive

3. Suspensions for truancy and fighting

4. Consuming alcohol at the age of 15

B. Frequent drinking

C. No mental health treatment in military

D. Attitude toward examiner: "Manipulative"

E. Possible drug seeking (from medical records)

F. Rule Out (r/o) exaggeration of symptoms (from medical records)

II. There are strict guidelines in the DSM-IV manual for diagnosing PTSD. You must meet or exceed the minimums in four separate criteria to receive this diagnosis.

A. You have a traumatic event.

B. You persistently re-experience the event in one or more ways.

C. You persistently avoid traumatic stimuli in two ways. The diagnostic criteria states that you must avoid this stimuli in three or more ways.

D. You have two symptoms of increased arousal. This satisfies this set of criteria.

III. The C&P examiner was not able to give you a AXIS I diagnosis of PTSD because you did not meet the complete criteria as listed in the DSM-IV. You missed it by one avoidance symptom. You were given a diagnosis of Depression, Not Otherwise Specified instead. The examiner did state that your depression was at least as likely as not related to your combat experience in Desert Storm.

IV. This issue will be denied because you do not have a diagnosis of PTSD.

V. You can avert this denial by searching your medical records for a diagnosis of PTSD from either a licensed clinical psychologist, or a board certified psychiatrist. Multiple diagnoses in your records would be even better.

VI. Even if you have the evidence I listed in V., you may still be denied based on those doctors not having access to your C-file and SMR's. I would suggest requesting a copy of your C-file from the VARO. This will help in two ways.

A. It will slow your claim down, and help you to gather and submit new evidence prior to the claim reaching the rating board. This will help you to avoid a lengthy appeals process.

B. You will be able to get a Independent Medical Opinion from a psychiatrist, and the doctor can state that he reviewed your complete C-file and SMR's, which would put his opinion on par with the C&P examiner's.

VII. If you are able to get a IMO that states your entire C-file and SMR's were reviewed, and provides a diagnosis of PTSD, you would get a 30% rating at best, based on this C&P. If you are able to get a IMO, push for a new C&P exam.

Issue 4, Skin Condition

I. You first reported this problem in 2008, 16 years after leaving the military.

II. The symptoms you presented with do not rise to a ratable level.

III. This issue will be denied because there is no evidence of direct or secondary service connection.

IV. A appeal of this issue would be fruitless, due to the lack of continuity.

V. You could attempt to get a Independent Medical Opinion for this condition, but I think you would have a hard time getting a doctor to tie the current condition with your military service. If you were able to find a doctor to make the nexus, this would most likely only be rated at 0%.

Overall, I do not think that you got the shaft by any of these doctors. These are not "bad" C&P's. They did thorough exams and listed the evidence as you presented it. We have to remember that these docs are not there to be our friends, nor listen to our long list of complaints. They are there to gather the information that the VARO has requested and to follow the guidelines on the C&P exam sheets.

If there is lies in the exams, please tell us what they are so we can get to work on turning that part around.

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

A rating for service connected depression is just as strong as for PTSD. All the junk about your childhood and teenage years is a quest for a personality disorder diagnosis. I would get a private medical opinion to verify the service connected mental conditions. You need to show the private doctor your SMR's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tankerjoe,had you been seeking help for this before asking for comp?

I started getting help last Feb. and was advised by my social worker that late March or early April to put in for comp. By then I had already been diagnosed as having PTSD and the C&P was simply to confirm via interview, pictures, etc (the hardest part) and the 2nd C&P to go through the officail questions.

Did you bring/ present any evidence to the 1st examiner? I didn't read the C&P's but will in a minute. The writeup I got from the "stressor" examiner (the 1st one) was the one that mattered as the Doc doing the 2nd said he had reviewed it and didn't want to get into any of that, only to ask his list of questions as I had done the hard part already.

When a VA doc writes that you have PTSD and came in voluntarilly to get treatment and a social worker says that you have been coming to them for the same, there is no denying that you have it and since you have a C.A.R. the stressor is not in question. Like I said, I have some documents if you were with Ripper, including a timeline that mentions a tank in one of the lanes hitting a mine and disabling it. I also have some documents from C Co, 3rd Tanks about how we in 1/7-3rd tanks were taking fire from 2nd Tanks (2nd MarDiv) because they didn't know we had M60's instead of M1's.

Lemme know if I can help you out.

Jason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use