Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Chronic Pain Syndrome And Depression

Rate this question


foleyj

Question

Since this is my first post I will give a brief background. As you can see from the profile I have been rated at 60% for my SCD's, here is the breakdown;

20%-SCD for lower back injury, annular tear and herniation L4-L5

20%-SCD for weakness, pain and numbness or right leg

20%-SCD right shoulder, torn capsule

20%-SCD left shoulder, torn capsule

I also have right and left hip bursitis secondary to the back injury that I submitted a claim for but was denied because of lack of evidence. I am also being treated for depression that started after I began receiving my disability benefits. I recently obtained documentation from my Ortho stating that the hip pain is related to my back injury. So that is something that I am going to resubmit to the VA as new evidence since it was denied previously. I also went to my psychiatrist and he filled out the nexus letter stating that the depression was possibly related to the chronic pain syndrome related to my injuries. My question is how do I proceed with the my claim as far as the depression? Should I claim depression and chronic pain syndrome, or should I claim as a separate disability? This is the first time that I have obtained documentation that diagnosis chronic pain syndrome. Also, can the psychiatrist diagnose chronic pain syndrome? Any guidance would be appreciated.

Jason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Thanks mags1023,

I am not being treated by the VA for depression. The depression started a few years after I started receiving benefits for my SCD's. I am not a Gulf War Veteran I enlisted just a few must after the war started to wind down. If you see from my response to LarryJ would I submit

as new evidence for my existing SCD's of, or as a new claim secondary to my SCD's? Also would I need to submit copies of my medical records from the psychiatrists that have diagnosed me and prescribed medications? I have the nexus letter that the Dr filled out and he checked off that the depression is possibly related to the chronic pain. He also noted that I suffer from chronic pain due to my injuries. I have searched the site for sample letters but I have not found any, could you point me in the right direction if you know of any samples that I can refer to? Basically what I am looking for is what exactly should I put in the claim as far as symptoms, meds, lack of interest in things that I used to enjoy, etc... Any information that you can provide would be great. Thanks.

I would submit as a new claim and as secondary to your SC disabilities. Sounds like your Nexus letter should cover what the VA needs to get started, but they will probably send you for a C&P exam anyway. You may want to get your psychiatrist to give you a GAF score if he hasn't already done so.While the GAF is not the only thing the VA uses, it does weigh heavily in the decision making process. Your letter just needs to say what you have already put down in these posts. "You are depressed because you aren't physically able to do the things you used to enjoy due to the service connected conditions that you suffer from." You may want to expound on the activities you used to enjoy doing and how your conditions preclude you from doing them now. I would include any pertinent evidence you have now, copies of course and include them as enclosures to your letter. I always submit the form and in remarks type "See attached statement". Mail it certified with return receipt. Good luck!

s/ Mags

We kept our promise and served honorably. Now it is time for the VA to keep their's!

I am not an attorney or VSO and offer my opinions free of charge. Any advice I provide in my posts is from experiences I have had with the VA or I have the knowledge that others have encoutered. I accept no liability for this advice should you chose to follow it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Chronic pain disorder is considered an emotional disorder and will not be rated separately from depression. The kinds of things you might want to use to describe your pain disorder is sleep disturbance, inability to enjoy life, preoccupation with pain, panic disorder. inability to maintain a social life etc. It should be more than not being able to play tennis or do sports.

If you have chronic pain you probably have depression as well. They go hand in hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish that doc had said probably and not possibly- better yet he should have said at least as likely as not-

or more than likely.

Did he make any statement as to how this might affect your employability when you are a civilian?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish that doc had said probably and not possibly- better yet he should have said at least as likely as not-

or more than likely.

Did he make any statement as to how this might affect your employability when you are a civilian?

I see an internal medicine physician for primary care. A few years back, I obtained a IMO concerning my SC knees and spine. I explained the importance of his statement "more likely than not" or "at least as likely as not", etc,. After some discussion, he rewrote his IMO to include "more likely than not". The good "Doc" asked me if his statement/IMO would help?? I told him, Yes!! And, it was "more likely than not" that I would pay my bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the help. I got the form from this site and it was described as a nexus form. On the form it has 3 possible choices for the doctor to check the first choice states Related to, the second Possibly related and the third is more likely as not to be related. The Dr. checked the second one which I am assuming is better than the last one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

"Possibly related" is speculation. That won't get service connection for you. That is not the kind of language you want to beat the VA. More likely than not or at least as likely as not is better by far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use