Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Update On

Rate this question


Berta

Question

I received another letter from Congressman Filner.

The VA's response from the AMC to my charges that they destroyed my evidence was

1.a copy of their February decision (which was great because -men and women I spent hours yesterday looking for it! I had a problem with my printer at the same time and have additional evidence to try to get to VA tomorrow-as well as copies of med recs to IMO doctor-and

I try to keep meticulous labeled files for all of my VA crapola- and advise to do that here all the time-but you know how it goes-

it is easy to mis -file stuff.

Then again I was so perturbed by the printer problem that I forgot what I was also looking for (the February VA Decision)however I continued to search relentlessly for what I forgot I was looking for -- ----why waste time. :lol:

Then the miracle occurred-in the midst of a fast moving squall with hailstones I went to my mailbox down at the road and got what I was looking for via Congressional Intervention! copy of the same decision. Ha Ha.

2. the Good part- attached to the decision was copy of email from me to H VAC and copy of response to Sub Comm liason, and to the VA liason person-

interesting-I have not been formally contacted on this at all by the VA.

"Please invite her to submit for the record (record being the H VAC) and forward her claim to VA as a lost/destroyed file inquiry."

The bad part is I have to make ANOTHER copy of this extensive evidence -working on my formal VA FAst Letter request as it is-a STACK of stuff they destroyed.

The good part- the H VAC will get it for the record and maybe give this some impetus.

At least I dont think the H VAC will lose either the request or all of the evidence.

This opened another bag of worms. I have been in contact with Congressman Filner by mail and spoke to him personally on other VA issues- that were not my claim situation.

The recent actual C & P exam results I got- where the C & P guy -a PA -didnt even come close to my knowledge of cardiology- is prime facie evidence of how piss poor these exams are-

exams that control the futures of disabled vets and their families.

I still have the VA exams I knocked down in the 1990s and apparently the BVA (by totally disregarding the initial VA opinion for my claim) saw how both Dr. BAsh and I knocked that one down to the curb.

You all DESERVE BETTER than having a C & P done by a PA or nurse who do not have MD next to their name and cannot possibly have the experience needed to opine on most claims.

I will respond and make this point as strongly as I can to Congressman FIlner.

Having anyone opining on a claim -who is also paid by VA or via a VA contract-is a total conflict of intrerest and this has got to stop.

The fact that veterans and widows DO succeed in combatting lousy C & P exams proves the point.If these VA medical 'examiner' people were legit in their opinions we could NEVER overcome their opinions.

The reality is that we often do.and sometimes even without an IMO.

The VA should refund our IMO money if we succeed.

If we ourselves are forced to obtain a real doctor- at an expense-to us to succeed in getting someone proficient enough to adequately medically opine-

either VA has to start providing real docs to us or pay for us to get them.

My medical evidence still remains unread by the VA, as their decision reveals under Evidence section.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

"believe any one could look at my 40 years of hospital treatments inpatient and outpatient and come to the same conclusion,i am way below the percentage i should be getting. "

That's why I had no choice but to go to a specialist like Dr Bash.

He was the only one that I could get to take a couple weeks doing just that.

I not only needed it for spinal SC, but for a final diagnoses of what I was sick from. To my serprise, He not only diagnosed MS, but traced it back to in service symptoms in my SMR's.

The DVA has been walking around his diagnoses since 2003, but have treating my for it since 1994.

I need to apologize to you Berta. I robbed your thread & ran off with it.

I hope & pray you'll get willing eyes laid on your issues soon. I know you've been fighting this a long time & have recieve the same treatment I have.

i apologize too berta good luck

skunkmeister

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Berta, I could not agree more with your thoughts on the Mariano V Princippi. If they VA has not rebutted your claim on the medical evidence. (Nor have they on mine) Then the "Benefit of a Doubt rule" 38 CFR, 3.102,4.3(2005) under Gilbert V Derwinski, 1 Vet App 49,53,(1990) can also be used if not both. That "a veteran need only demonstrate that there is an approximate balence of positive and negative evidence in order to PREVAIL." Ok so the problem is as with me that the RO can usually pull something like....... "this evidence is not open for discussion" or ..."the medical opinions are not probative". So then it has to go thru the appeal process and before the BVA which in most cases will say ........... something like .....' The board finds fault with the RO in that the Veteran did infact show competent medical opinion and has proved within reasonable doubt that his disease did in fact happen to be service connected." Or that the RO is not allowed to seek Medical opinions that counter the Veterans Medical Nexus under the guidelines set forth by Mariano V Princippi. OK heres the problem that may take 2 -3 yrs. And the Board pulls the old favorite trick of REMANDING it back to the RO for them to make a decision. OK .......here is another 1-2 yrs even if the Board says it must be EXPEDITED..... What a total waste of time , resources, TAX payer dollars. Because in the majority of the cases where the Evidence is clear and more than 50/50 the Vet almost always prevails in the end at the appeals process. It would be interesting to sit down with the House and Senate VA committees and show them this ridiculous game the VA plays. If Congress could see the little VA game and realize that it is a way to cut cost ........it might get changed. MAKE THE VA to follow case precedent and these 2 laws mentioned above at the Regional Office. I would also like to bring up that VA counsel should have to be forced to accept past precedents like any other court of law. Veterans DO NOT have due process and are not treated as an American citizen......I do not understand why some Veterans groups do not bring this up. It is absolutely criminal on the VA. Yes Berta , I know that you will prevail in you case and eventually so will I but this circus atmosphere that happens because the system is so used to it that everyone ignores the meaning of FAIR or REASONABLE. This has to be changed and needs to be addressed in front of Congress. I hope Allan and Skunk and You , Berta, continue to hang in there as the VA's only hope is either death or frustration and quit. God Bless, and remember ,,,,,,NEVER GIVE UP. C.C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta,

It has been almost a year now since my grant and I still can't walk straight for dodging their pot holes and mud puddles.

Take Care,

Betty

:D B) LOLLLLLLOLOL!!!! That's funny...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use