Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Berta - Lawyer Finally Takes My Tort Claim

Rate this question


Teac

Question

A year ago this month the va screwed up my left eye cataract surgery. I have looked of lawyer for a year. Today a well know Austin texas law firm accepted my case for represenation. :unsure: I was told that a claim of 300,000 was not unusal for the damage the va did, and that it likely will settle outside of court for at least 200,000. The law firm gets 20% of the settlement or 25% if it goes to court.

I was really surprised by the call from the lawyers office, I expected another turn down, but was assured that I clearly have a winning claim.... wish me the best of luck because since I am already 100% a new rating would not provide me any additonal compensation...... so this is the only way I can get compensation for this problem.......

Edited by jbasser
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I am glad that you got a good Lawyer and sad for what happened to you. I am sure its more about what the VA did to you than anything else. Seems like a very fair fee that you have agreed to.

I think in Texas that we are limited to 500,000 thanks to our last President.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

25% is very low for this type of claim. I think in Florida the malpractice lawyers usually get 40% plus expenses beyond the award. I used a nursing home and we won 575,000 bucks and the lawyer got almost half including expenses. When I say "we" I mean the estate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teac,

Sounds like your filing suit under the FTCA, if so, I believe my law firm was limited to

20 % of the my award - because the money comes from the tax payers.

On Federal Tort Claims, I do remember the percentage the lawyers are entitled to

is the same percentage in every state, as it is Federal.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teac,

Sounds like your filing suit under the FTCA, if so, I believe my law firm was limited to

20 % of the my award - because the money comes from the tax payers.

On Federal Tort Claims, I do remember the percentage the lawyers are entitled to

is the same percentage in every state, as it is Federal.

jmho,

carlie

Did you win your claim?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teac,

Through court ordered mediation,I settled at

about 25% of the lowest figure you posted

and the doctor no longer being licensed.

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"wish me the best of luck because since I am already 100% a new rating would not provide me any additonal compensation...... so this is the only way I can get compensation for this problem......."

Right! and this is good news-

FTCA is a complex issue (then again my FTCA case was easier to prove that my other claims-maybe because lawyers at VA can read)

Teac- I realised in 2003 that I could not sue VA twice for same death so I filed an AO claim- it was not filed as Sec 1151 either-because I already had 1151 award-but I had uncovered the exact etiology of the malpractice they paid FTCA settlement to me on-

I re-opened with additional malpractice and as you know I got a BVA decision 2 weeks ago that awards all pending claims I had (6 I think-even the CUE claims)

I am bringing his up to you because you are in same position as I am- for a FTCA case as a distinct separate award from any VA comp-

If you state has a cap (I checked this before I negotiated with the General COunsel)you know how high he lawyer can try to get them to go on a OOC settlement.

If you dont like the offers the lawyer might well recommend federal court -

I am glad you pursued this- over the years I have had many questions about FTCA from vets or widows who did seem to have basis for FTCA claims- yet who failed to follow through-

many -like me-were told by lawyers we didnt have a case-

so I did my FTCA myself and succeeded-makes you wonder about the legal community sometimes

I tried to get pro se attorney fees added to my settlement (since I had done all the legal work myself)and at this point the VA attorney was exasperated!

He said I had given them a very tough fight-and I held quite firm on what I would accept as a settlement.

This is what a good malpractice lawyer will do for you-

it will save you los of time preparing paperwork and then dealing with the VA lawyers one to one.

(who are magnificent lawyers-in my opinion- and they are tough)

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use