Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

A Question Which I Hate

Rate this question


purple

Question

I just got an e-mail from a lady who helped me get an appt at the Dayton Vet Center. This lady works at another vet center in another state.

She wanted to know when my appt was and was I an OIF/OEF vet. What? Why does that matter what "type" of vet I am??

I find I get asked this question more and more and I hate it because I see how it has a negative impact on appts.

I told her that and I also told her that a vet is a vet is a vet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

What the VA is doing by catering to the OIF/OEF vets is creating a very specific set of statistics to present to the public and the lawmakers. Since this group of vets are getting quick appts, quicker turnaround on claims...quick everything; the VA can turn in those stats and say "Look how good we are doing at taking care of our vets!"

It won't matter that they are only talking about 3% of the total veteran population--oh no--they will leave that part out; and no one will be the wiser.....except those of us who know the truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I really think that there is one giant misconception on this thread. That the VA is catering to OIF/OAF Veterans. The VA has always been more attentive to Veterans who are recently discharged. We can see on this very Board OIF Veterans who have been waiting a long time and being chumped by VA and the merry go round with hurdles.

What is mainly going on is the VA turning Veterans against each other.

Except for the VA propaganda film I saw the other day I have never heard of a Veteran getting full benefits without a real fight.

Social Security in less than 4 months

100% in 1945 Days or 5 years and 4 months

Hasn't changed all that much either in my opinion except Vets can hire their own lawyer for appeals.

I recognize all Veterans but if there is to be a priority it should be for Service Connected Veterans.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Bring back the draft and make those with a family income of 250,000 or more top priority to serve. All our problems would be over. If sons and daughters of ruling elite were the first to serve in combat units I think the VA would get an immediate face lift. As long as poor boys and girls do the heavy lifting these "Fallen Heros" will just continue to rot in their graves as the rest of the nation goes to the Mall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I recognize all Veterans but if there is to be a priority it should be for Service Connected Veterans.

Pete this is a fine idea but look how many of us spend "years" fighting the system to get service connected? Despite the fact that the majority of veterans are SC the VARO spends months if not years putting us on the "hamster wheel" fighting to get that determination of being SC,,,,,until then we are only claimants then you have the people that want to pit "combat vets vs all other vets" veterans that are medically or mentally harmed in service are all disabled veterans why is a guy that gets shot by an Iraqi or Afghan more important than another veteran that was shot by friendly fire they are both shot

why is a veteran that almost killed by fellow soldiers while they were robbing them on a military base anywhere in the world less deserving of speedy service on a claim than a veteran who falls off a truck in Afghanistan, Kuwait or Iraq?

The claims should be handled ona first in first out basis any other special treatment is just that "special treatment" but as long as we have reasons to allow special processing veterans older than 70 are supposed to go to the Tiger team for expeditious handling, homeless vets are supposed to get expeditious, most of us have seen expeditious handling - all that means is the claim gets denied faster and the appeals are handled the same as everyone else's Slooooooooooooooooooooow boat to China route the best thing that has happened to veterans and widows is the fact we cna now hire lawyers to handle our appeals we have actually become full fledged Americans with rights to attornies, despite everything the service organizations could do to stop them, at least the lawyer returns my e mails and my phone calls that was a lot more than any of the Service organizations ever did, and I have used a lot of them in the past 7 years American Legion, DVA, PVA they are all real good at asking for life time memberships except the PVA due to my back and heart I qualified for automatic membership and they charge nothing for it, it's the only Service group I am a member of and get their magazines and I do support them, but with that stated their SO is no more intelligent than the other 2, he was useless also and told me that I could not win secondary SC for CAD and hypertension to PTSD, BVA judge proved them all wrong

If I had listened to the SOs over the years I would have been a grateful little boy with the initial award of 50% for PTSD and would have quit wasting their time and the VAROs time I am glad I found Hadit and am really happy I refused to be the nice little boy they had wanted me to be, my family would have been cheated out of their full benefits they are entitled to, and CHAMPVA health care, DIC benefits in the future etc, the Service Organizations really need to assess who they are actually working for veterans or the VA system.

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pete-

It's not a misconception, they are catering to the OIF/OEF vets. There are programs out there which you have to be a OIF/OEF vet in order to attend. Ex...there was a seminar one day at the Dayton VAMC about money management...ok, kewl...I wanted to attend. However, it was only for OIF/OEF vets!! There are many things advertised with the notation that its only for OIF/OEF vets...and to me, that is complete BS.

The next time I see a seminar I want to attend...I'm going. And I'll let them know that a vet is a vet is a vet.

There were plenty of men at the Ohio Women's Veterans Conference...I was told they were welcomed to attend....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use