Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Veterans And The Universal Healthcare Debate

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

VETERANS AND THE UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE DEBATE

Posted on July 19, 2009 by gordonduff http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.phpvar addthis_pub = \'peapolzmedia\';

FEW VETERAN FAMILIES ARE COVERED BY ANY INSURANCE

HEALTH CARE RATIONED IN AMERICA BY MONEY

By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER

As a 100% Disabled Veteran, I qualify for full VA health care, including dental and optical. It hasn't been a perfect relationship. I got glasses a decade ago. They were broken and didn't fit when I got them in the mail. The VA has sent me to private dentists as they have not had qualified people available. It has cost me thousands. Specialist referrals are never made or have had year long waits and most problems or illnesses have been misdiagnosed.

The point? The VA is batting about the same as our wonderful civilian health care system but it is getting better, endlesssly better than it was. The VA is crippled from a few directions that, we hope, will not hamper a national system:

  • The Bush administration saw DVA health care as an entitlement to cut rather than a right earned by those that served their country.
  • A totally unaccountable bureaucracy, tied to conservative VSOs, is in place insulating the DVA system from serious improvement. This group stresses an organization that places patient interests last, contrary to mandated legal ethics. (In Bed With the Enemy)
  • In some, perhaps many, areas, doctors and nurses face retaliation for supporting patient rights.


    Veterans come in 3 health care categories with many subcategories.


  1. Retirees with Tricare
  2. 100% Permanent and Total Disabled Veterans whose families have CHAMPVA
  3. All other categories with no family coverage or dental and optical.

Category 3 is huge. It assumes that these vets are employed or retired with full health care covering their families. The VA assumes that the Veterans insurance carrier will cover co-pays and fees also.

The problem with this is that the number of people in the US with health insurance is plunging rapidly. Not only that, but those with coverage are watching that increasingly restricted with severe limitations on treatments and drugs.

Additionally, it has built a system tied to scamming money. The classic case is the endless number of new drugs being pushed onto the market that are either useless, if you are lucky, or totally dangerous. Unnecessary drugs are used because doctors are inundated with "drug pimps" and falsified scientific data. Can an entire country have "erectile dysfuntion?" If Congress is any indication, I would think we may have some fakers out there.

I have experience with the health care systems in Europe and find them superior to those in the US. Many say the French system is the best. Seeing a doctor in Britain didn't take more than 5 minutes, receiving treatment was frighteningly easy and they barely asked my name. When I took out a credit card to pay, they seemed insulted. They said, "Health care is a right, not a product."

It is my belief that we can get the DVA system on track, reform the medical ethics problem and deal with the disability pension problem that is both inundated with claims and totally mismanged.

We can do this the moment the VSOs step aside and a few key members of Congress get their own mental health issues taken care of. Current attitudes about veterans health care, in Congress and even Executive level show clear signs of delusion.

Perhaps those involved have previously existing personality disorders. I wonder if their insurance covers that?

In the interim, the vast majority of veterans have families either without insurance or at risk of losing coverage. Imagine a veteran running down to the local DVA medical center to receive treatment that he can't afford for his own children.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/modules.php?n...le&sid=8002

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

True Pete---I learned that while stationed overseas for 8 years. The amount of taxes that European citizens pay....WOW!....we should consider ourselves very, very lucky!! Sure, their incomes are higher....but they are taxed out the butt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Do you hate medicare as well? Do you give back your SSD checks? Oh, God, it's socialism....eeeeekkkkk!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
we have to stay very far away ...............................................

The rest of this post removed due to partisan politics.

carlie

Now damnit, Carlie...that was not partisan as I am not a member of either party. It is true words, as it comes from the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office. I have no problems with being edited when it is due, but it wasn't in this post.

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Do you hate medicare as well? Do you give back your SSD checks? Oh, God, it's socialism....eeeeekkkkk!

John, remove your political views from the picture for a moment and look at the facts of the situation. Social Security is not socialism. We are all forced to pay into that system, and we each hope to get that money back, plus interest when the time comes. VA disability compensation is not socialism, either. We each earned that, the same way that a civilian employ earns long-term disability compensation through a employer should they become unable to work. Medicare is government forced benevolence, which is socialism, but I don't think very many have a problem with that.

The problem that folks have with Medicare is that it began as a way to provide medical treatment to poor women and their children, and it has morphed into something that encompasses all poor folks. Moreover, each state is forced to pay 43% of the overall bill for Medicare, but they were not given a say in the matter. It was forced upon them by the federal government. Add to this, the fact that Medicare does not pay doctors what their time is worth, and massive, continual budget cuts to the system and you get the current result of rationing of health care within that system. Now, with the current administrations plans on health care, they are proposing to cut the Medicare budget another $400 billion over the next ten years, which would result in a even lower quality and availability of care to those that rely on that system. In addition to that, the sates are going to be required to pay the same 43% of the burden of the new universal coverage system that the government is proposing in 3 to 5 years. But, again, they have no say in this whatsoever. It is being legislated to them by the federal government.

All of this is compounded by the fact that only 2% of medical school graduates go into the field of primary care. Ninety eight percent of the graduates go into a medical specialty. To be sure, some of them do so to get wealthy, but the majority do this in order to have the ability to repay their the debt that they incurred while gaining their education. The small amount that is paid by government programs to reimburse primary care docs is second in reasoning only behind outrageous tort claims and the impact these claims have on malpractice insurance.

If you read my last blog, I relate the CBO's numbers to the number of jobs that will be lost as a result of the new health care legislation. I, along with a growing majority of politicians, democrat and republican, believe this is something that we cannot afford to do to the country at this time. We are already bankrupt, and these spending efforts cannot be continued. Never, in the history of economics and finance, has any person or entity been able to spend their way out of debt. And while it is true that you have to spend money to make money, a democratic form of government has no authority, or capability to create wealth, but merely move it from person to another.

To the mods: this is not a political rant, so please don't take it as such and edit it. I have laid out facts as presented from a non-political entity. I am not saying that nothing should be done about the skyrocketing costs of health care and drugs. Of course it does, but we cannot further backrupt the country in the process.

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Founder

letting this stand, as posted.

please don't allow this thread to degenerate into a partisan bickering session.

John, remove your political views from the picture for a moment and look at the facts of the situation. Social Security is not socialism. We are all forced to pay into that system, and we each hope to get that money back, plus interest when the time comes. VA disability compensation is not socialism, either. We each earned that, the same way that a civilian employ earns long-term disability compensation through a employer should they become unable to work. Medicare is government forced benevolence, which is socialism, but I don't think very many have a problem with that.

The problem that folks have with Medicare is that it began as a way to provide medical treatment to poor women and their children, and it has morphed into something that encompasses all poor folks. Moreover, each state is forced to pay 43% of the overall bill for Medicare, but they were not given a say in the matter. It was forced upon them by the federal government. Add to this, the fact that Medicare does not pay doctors what their time is worth, and massive, continual budget cuts to the system and you get the current result of rationing of health care within that system. Now, with the current administrations plans on health care, they are proposing to cut the Medicare budget another $400 billion over the next ten years, which would result in a even lower quality and availability of care to those that rely on that system. In addition to that, the sates are going to be required to pay the same 43% of the burden of the new universal coverage system that the government is proposing in 3 to 5 years. But, again, they have no say in this whatsoever. It is being legislated to them by the federal government.

All of this is compounded by the fact that only 2% of medical school graduates go into the field of primary care. Ninety eight percent of the graduates go into a medical specialty. To be sure, some of them do so to get wealthy, but the majority do this in order to have the ability to repay their the debt that they incurred while gaining their education. The small amount that is paid by government programs to reimburse primary care docs is second in reasoning only behind outrageous tort claims and the impact these claims have on malpractice insurance.

If you read my last blog, I relate the CBO's numbers to the number of jobs that will be lost as a result of the new health care legislation. I, along with a growing majority of politicians, democrat and republican, believe this is something that we cannot afford to do to the country at this time. We are already bankrupt, and these spending efforts cannot be continued. Never, in the history of economics and finance, has any person or entity been able to spend their way out of debt. And while it is true that you have to spend money to make money, a democratic form of government has no authority, or capability to create wealth, but merely move it from person to another.

To the mods: this is not a political rant, so please don't take it as such and edit it. I have laid out facts as presented from a non-political entity. I am not saying that nothing should be done about the skyrocketing costs of health care and drugs. Of course it does, but we cannot further backrupt the country in the process.

Tbird
 

Founder HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran LLC - Founded Jan 20, 1997

 

HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran | Community Forum | RallyPointFaceBook | LinkedInAbout Me

 

Time Dedicated to HadIt.com Veterans and my brothers and sisters: 65,700 - 109,500 Hours Over Thirty Years

 

diary-a-mad-sailor-signature-banner.png

I am writing my memoirs and would love it if you could help a shipmate out and look at it.

I've had a few challenges, perhaps the same as you. I relate them here to demonstrate that we can learn, overcome, and find purpose in life.

The stories can be harrowing to read; they were challenging to live. Remember that each story taught me something I would need once I found my purpose, and my purpose was and is HadIt.com Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

In my opinion it serves all of us to be better informed about Medical Coverage and as long as this thread does not get personal or attack politicians or parties it would be useful for our Members. After all Knowledge is Power. To me the sad thing is Veterans are usually on the short end of the stick and in this case unless you have Medical Coverage or Medicare you will not be a part in the great debate.

I also believe that the new Health Insurance Reform will force many Veterans being treated outside the VA into or back into the VA System.

So if a Member Posts in this thread and does not attack a Hadit Member or our duly elected politicians I will not touch it. By the way the only edits I do are to fix a problem not change content. I do unapprove posts that violate rules and inform the poster.

This does not mean that you cannot criticize politicians for plans or schemes that they have you just have to do it with information that can be checked and verified. Cites to partisan webs are not included.

If you have a question please feel free to email me.

I personally feel that both parties have failed Americans regarding Health Care.I have Medicare and have used it and think it is a great program. I wish I could have ChampVA and Medicare like my wife and I would be a happy camper.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use