Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

How Does The Va Look At Auto Accidents?

Rate this question


nyc-vet

Question

I have a few issues I need advice on. I am currently getting 40% for low back and 20% for neck plus other issues totaling 90%. Im trying to get secondary issues sciatica and headaches connected to the low back and neck. I submitted the claim 2 months ago but really didn't have any evidence except word of mouth and a few doctor visits to the VA ER for both headaches and sciatica.

2 months ago i was going to bank simply on those ER visit as enough evidence for secondary claims. But low and behold I get rear ended the other day and immediately the pain shot to my back, neck, down my left and i got a terrible headache that still lingers after a month.

I am now doing therapy, accupunture, chiropractor, etc.. 3 times a week for the past month. MRI shows bulging disk and herniated disk in neck and back. I don't rather to cry because I'm in more pain or to laugh because this might be my key to getting a nexus and increase for my neck.

With all that said, how will the VA view this accident? Do they view accidents after service as not service connected Or is it viewed as a worsened conditions?

I am also trying to get chronic fatigue secondary to back. I have no evidence but word of mouth. How do I prove this. I am drained everyday by constant body pains for the top of my head to the soles of my feet (literally).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

has the VA ever done a MRI on your back and neck? If not that would be a part of what you send in to the RO. I think you are on the right track keep doing research and check out the topic above this one it may help you Rose v. West.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

has the VA ever done a MRI on your back and neck? If not that would be a part of what you send in to the RO. I think you are on the right track keep doing research and check out the topic above this one it may help you Rose v. West.

ok thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I think the VA doesn't care WHY your already service connected conditions have worsened. If you are SC for traumatic knee injury when you were 20, and now you're all old and decrepit and arthritic anyway and you put in for an increase, the VA doesn't say "Well, yeah, you meet the criteria for the higher evaluation, but it's because you're old and decrepit."

If you are already service connected for the conditions, yeah, things happen and your condition is worsened. If you weren't ALREADY service connected then you wouldn't be having these worth problems probably, right? If it's gotten worse, we're not supposed to care WHY it's gotten worse.

I can't find an M21-1MR or CFR that comes right out and says that though.

Now, if you were talking about an ORIGINAL claim for service connection, yeah, in that case the rater is going to want a medical opinion from a doctor clarifying whether the claimed condition is a continuation of the symptoms in service, or if it was due to an intercurrent cause like a car accident, or stepping in a gopher hole while golfing.

Does that help at all?

*/ The comments and opinions expressed above are solely those of the commenter in their personal capacity and do not in any way represent the Department of Veterans Affairs. */

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are already service connected it will be looked upon as a worsening condition if you are already rated for it, that is before the accident. This is what happen to me but you must show a continuity of treatment before the accident. If you are trying to SC because you have medical records that show your injuries were originally injured in service you will have an up hill battle. make sure they have your medical records if its the ladder of the two. Yogg

GENERAL GEORGE S. PATTON, JR.

"Do more than is required of you."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

x

x

x

x

You filed a VA Claim for headaches and sciatica prior to this recent auto accident (an "intercurrent cause"); and you have medical evidence of headaches and sciatica prior to this accident, then you should be able to explain the sudden, acute aggravation. Prior to this most recent accident, would you claim the headaches and sciatica were acute, static or chronic? IMO, Your medical evidence will have to be bulletproof. ~~~Wings

Proximate Results, Secondary Conditions: A disability, which is proximately due to, or the result of a service-connected disease or injury will be service connected. The secondary condition will be considered a part of the original condition. There are certain conditions that may not be separately evaluated. In those cases, service connection is established by showing both the primary condition and the secondary condition together with appropriate evaluations. Under the provisions of 38 CFR 3.310(a), disabilities, which are proximately due to, or the result of a service connected condition will be service connected. An increase in non-service connected disability caused by aggravation from a service connected disability will also be service connected. (Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439 (1995); 38 CFR 3.310(b)).

Note: Search COAVC for "intercurrent causes"

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the VA doesn't care WHY your already service connected conditions have worsened. If you are SC for traumatic knee injury when you were 20, and now you're all old and decrepit and arthritic anyway and you put in for an increase, the VA doesn't say "Well, yeah, you meet the criteria for the higher evaluation, but it's because you're old and decrepit."

If you are already service connected for the conditions, yeah, things happen and your condition is worsened. If you weren't ALREADY service connected then you wouldn't be having these worth problems probably, right? If it's gotten worse, we're not supposed to care WHY it's gotten worse.

I can't find an M21-1MR or CFR that comes right out and says that though.

Now, if you were talking about an ORIGINAL claim for service connection, yeah, in that case the rater is going to want a medical opinion from a doctor clarifying whether the claimed condition is a continuation of the symptoms in service, or if it was due to an intercurrent cause like a car accident, or stepping in a gopher hole while golfing.

Does that help at all?

Thanks for the reply, I'm going to approach it as it has gotten worse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use