Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Enough Evidence?

Rate this question


thisangel

Question

In jun 2006 i was sexually assaulted, by nov 2006 I was medically discharged from the Air Force for major depression among other things. In 2007 I filed my disability claim. I received 20% for chronic back pain and ankle problems. My claim for PTSD was denied because I didn't submit any evidence(too traumatic). Needless to say it has really physically taking a toll on me. If I submit the following evidence do you think my personal statement about the event can be less in depth? I really really don't want to write it at all.

Rape treatment center notes, OSI (air force investigator) notes, and current PTSD diagnosis.

While on active duty I was treated for major depression because of the assault I guess it hadn't progressed to PTSD until a little later or I did an okay job of hiding it.

Also, I have been going to school since Nov 08. I informed the school of this medical condition with supporting documentation and they have been working with me. But a few weeks ago I received a letter from my school stating they are aware of my medical condition but I am missing too much school and not progressing. They told me i had to take a leave of absence or they would kick me out. Is this something I should also submit with my claim?

I also had another incident in jan-feb 05. A guy was stalking me and threating mine/and my daughters' lives. I had my reporting date to my new assignment moved from jun to Mar and my daughter stayed with her dad for a mo until until we left. The local PD did nothing but the base Judge Advocate banned him from the base for 5yrs. Is this something I could include in my claim?

I've been trying to walk around like everything is okay and I just can't do it anymore. I'm tired, my body is tired. I need help

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

30. Evaluating Evidence in Claims Based on Personal Trauma

From M21-1MR

http://www.warms.vba.va.gov/M21_1MR.html

Scroll down to:

SubptIV - General Rating Process

Chapter 4 - Rating Specific Disabilities, Updated 12/13/05

Click on:

Section H - Mental Disorders, Updated 8/3/09

30. Evaluating Evidence in Claims Based on Personal Trauma

Introduction This topic contains information about evaluating evidence in claims based on personal trauma, including

· evidence of personal trauma

· alternative evidence of in-service personal trauma

· evaluating the available evidence

· development requirements for secondary evidence

· interpretation of secondary evidence, and

· obtaining evidence.

Change Date August 3, 2009

a. Evidence of Personal Trauma Personal trauma is an event of human design that threatens or inflicts harm, such as

· rape

· physical assault and domestic battering

· robbery and mugging

· stalking, and

· harassment.

b. Alternative Evidence of In-Service Personal Trauma If the military record contains no documentation that personal trauma, including in-service sexual assault, occurred, alternative evidence might still establish an in-service stressful incident.

Sources of such evidence include

· a rape crisis center or center for domestic abuse

· a counseling facility or health clinic

· family members or roommates

· a faculty member

· civilian police reports

· medical reports from civilian physicians or caregivers who treated the veteran immediately or sometime later

· a chaplain or clergy

· fellow service persons, and

· personal diaries or journals.

30. Evaluating Evidence in Claims Based on Personal Trauma, Continued

c. Evaluating the Available Evidence Rating Veterans Service Representatives (RVSRs) must carefully evaluate all of the available evidence.

If the military records contain no documentation that personal trauma occurred, consider secondary evidence, such as

· lay statements

- indicating increased use or abuse of leave without an apparent reason, such as family obligations or family illness, or

- describing episodes of depression, panic attacks, or anxiety, but no identifiable reasons for the episodes, and

· evidence of behavioral changes that occurred around the time of the incident, including

- visits to a medical or counseling clinic or dispensary without a specific diagnosis or specific ailment

- use of pregnancy tests or tests for sexually-transmitted diseases around the time of the incident

- sudden requests that the veteran’s military occupational series or duty assignment be changed without other justification

- changes in performance and performance evaluations

- increased or decreased use of prescription medications

- increased use of over-the-counter medications

- evidence of substance abuse, such as alcohol or drugs

- increased disregard for military or civilian authority

- obsessive behavior such as overeating or undereating

- increased interest in tests for HIV or sexually transmitted diseases

- unexplained economic or social behavior changes

- treatment for physical injuries around the time of the claimed trauma, but not reported as a result of the trauma, and/or

- the breakup of a primary relationship.

Notes:

· Secondary evidence may need interpretation by a clinician in personal trauma claims, especially if the claim involves behavior changes.

· Evidence that documents behavior changes may require interpretation in relation to the medical diagnosis by a neuropsychiatric physician.

Important: When preparing letters of notification or rating decisions in personal trauma cases, use a tone that conveys sensitivity and compassion, regardless of whether the claim is granted or denied.

30. Evaluating Evidence in Claims Based on Personal Trauma, Continued

d. Development Requirements for Secondary Evidence Do not deny a PTSD claim that is based on in-service personal trauma without first advising the claimant that evidence from sources other than service treatment records (STRs), such as evidence of behavioral changes, may constitute credible supporting evidence of the stressor.

Allow the veteran the opportunity to furnish this type of evidence or indicate its potential sources.

e. Interpretation of Secondary Evidence In personal trauma claims, interpretation of secondary evidence by a clinician may be required, especially if the claim involves behavioral changes.

Evidence that supports such behavioral changes may require

· interpretation in relationship to the medical diagnosis, or

· an opinion by an appropriate medical or mental health professional as to whether it indicates that personal trauma occurred.

Reference: For more information on VA’s responsibility to obtain secondary evidence needed to corroborate a personal trauma claim, see Patton v. West, 12 Vet. App. 272 (1999).

f. Obtaining Evidence For more information on obtaining service records, medical treatment records, and evidence of personal trauma, see M21-1MR, Part IV, Subpart ii, 1.D.

31. Handling Examinations in Claims for Service Connection for PTSD

Introduction This topic contains information about handling examinations in claims for service connection for PTSD, including

· when to proceed with an examination

· requesting initial PTSD examinations, and

· handling inadequate examination reports.

Change Date August 3, 2009

a. When to Proceed With an Examination In PTSD claims alleging personal trauma, if development fails to identify credible supporting evidence that the claimed stressor actually occurred, or fails to show in-service behavioral changes, deny the claim. Otherwise, request an examination if it is necessary to decide the claim.

In PTSD claims alleging a stressor other than personal trauma, if development fails to identify credible supporting evidence that the claimed stressor actually occurred, then deny the claim. Request an immediate examination if

· evidence or records confirm the stressor occurred

· evidence (to include lay statements) indicates the veteran currently suffers from symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of PTSD, and

· medical evidence adequate for rating purposes is not already of record.

Notes:

· Do not request an examination until

- all development actions are complete, and

- all medical evidence requested has been received (or the specified time limit for submitting the evidence has expired).

· Forward the claims folder to the examining facility and request its review as part of the examination process anytime the issue is service connection for PTSD.

References: For more information on

· requesting examinations, see M21-1MR, Part III, Subpart iv, 3.A

· PTSD examinations, see the “Best Practice Manual” in the Rating Job Aids website, and

· requesting medical evidence, see M21-1MR, Part I, 1.C.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use